Elgendy Akram Y, Elgendy Islam Y, Mahmoud Ahmed N, Bavry Anthony A
Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville.
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville.
Clin Cardiol. 2017 Aug;40(8):534-541. doi: 10.1002/clc.22691. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
Randomized clinical trials that examined long-term clinical outcomes of routine aspiration thrombectomy prior to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction have yielded different results. We hypothesized that the routine use of manual thrombus aspiration prior to primary PCI lacks long-term clinical benefits. Electronic databases were searched for randomized trials comparing routine aspiration thrombectomy and conventional PCI. We included only trials that reported clinical outcomes beyond 6 months. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and the secondary outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events, re-infarction, cardiovascular mortality, and stent thrombosis (ST). A DerSimonian-Laird model was used to construct the summary estimates risk ratio (RR). We retrieved 18 trials with 20 641 ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients, of whom 10 331 patients underwent routine aspiration thrombectomy prior to primary PCI. At a mean follow-up of 12 months, there was no significant decrease in the risk of all-cause mortality (RR: 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.82-1.05, P = 0.22), major adverse cardiac events (RR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.87-1.03, P = 0.18), re-infarction (RR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.80-1.13, P = 0.59), cardiovascular mortality (RR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.47-1.36, P = 0.40), or ST (RR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.63-1.01, P = 0.06) with routine aspiration thrombectomy. Routine aspiration thrombectomy prior to primary PCI was not associated with a reduction in long-term mortality or clinical outcomes. Future randomized trials are warranted to further evaluate the role of aspiration thrombectomy in select patients and coronary lesions.
针对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者,在进行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)之前进行常规血栓抽吸术的长期临床疗效的随机临床试验得出了不同的结果。我们推测,在直接PCI之前常规使用手动血栓抽吸术缺乏长期临床益处。检索电子数据库以查找比较常规血栓抽吸术和传统PCI的随机试验。我们仅纳入了报告6个月以上临床疗效的试验。主要结局是全因死亡率,次要结局包括主要不良心血管事件、再梗死、心血管死亡率和支架血栓形成(ST)。采用DerSimonian-Laird模型构建汇总估计风险比(RR)。我们检索到18项试验,共纳入20641例ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者,其中10331例患者在直接PCI之前接受了常规血栓抽吸术。平均随访12个月时,常规血栓抽吸术在全因死亡率(RR:0.93,95%置信区间[CI]:0.82-1.05,P = 0.22)、主要不良心脏事件(RR:0.95,95%CI:0.87-1.03,P = 0.18)、再梗死(RR:0.95,95%CI:0.80-1.13,P = 0.59)、心血管死亡率(RR:0.80,95%CI:0.47-1.36,P = 0.40)或ST(RR:0.80,95%CI:0.63-1.01,P = 0.06)方面并无显著降低。直接PCI之前的常规血栓抽吸术与长期死亡率或临床疗效的降低无关。未来有必要进行随机试验,以进一步评估血栓抽吸术在特定患者和冠状动脉病变中的作用。