Fastner Christian, Behnes Michael, Sartorius Benjamin, Wenke Annika, El-Battrawy Ibrahim, Ansari Uzair, Gill Ishar-Singh, Borggrefe Martin, Akin Ibrahim
First Department of Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Clin Cardiol. 2017 Aug;40(8):566-574. doi: 10.1002/clc.22699. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
The interventional left atrial appendage (LAA) closure represents an emerging alternative to oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention in certain atrial fibrillation patients. Preliminary results have suggested high procedural success rates and fewer peri-interventional complications; however, there persists an insufficient understanding of the role of many underlying confounding variables (e.g., anatomical characteristics).
It was investigated whether varying LAA morphologies influence procedural success as well as in-hospital outcome.
Sixty-seven patients ineligible for long-term oral anticoagulation were included in this single-center, prospective, observational registry spanning from the years 2014 to 2016. Interventions were performed with the Watchman occluder (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA) or the Amplatzer Amulet (St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN), at the operator's discretion. Results derived from the data describing procedural success, fluoroscopy, and peri-interventional safety events were classified according to the presenting LAA morphology (cauliflower, cactus, windsock, and chicken wing).
Rates of successful implantation were high across all groups (≥98%; P = 0.326). Surrogate parameters underlining procedural complexity like median total duration (P = 0.415), median fluoroscopy time (P = 0.459), median dose area product (P = 0.698), and the median amount of contrast agent (P = 0.076) demonstrated similar results across all groups. Likewise, the periprocedural complication rate was not significantly different and was mainly restricted to minor bleeding events.
Irrespective of the varying morphological presentation of the LAA, the procedural success rates, interventional characteristics, and safety events did not significantly differ among patients receiving an interventional LAA closure.
对于某些心房颤动患者,经介入方法封闭左心耳(LAA)是一种新兴的预防中风的替代口服抗凝治疗的方法。初步结果显示手术成功率高且围手术期并发症较少;然而,对于许多潜在混杂变量(如解剖特征)的作用仍缺乏充分了解。
研究不同的LAA形态是否会影响手术成功率以及住院结局。
本单中心、前瞻性、观察性注册研究纳入了67例不适合长期口服抗凝治疗的患者,研究时间跨度为2014年至2016年。由术者自行决定使用Watchman封堵器(波士顿科学公司,马萨诸塞州纳蒂克)或Amplatzer Amulet(圣犹达医疗公司,明尼苏达州圣保罗)进行干预。根据呈现的LAA形态(菜花状、仙人掌状、风袋状和鸡翅状)对描述手术成功率、透视情况和围手术期安全事件的数据结果进行分类。
所有组的成功植入率都很高(≥98%;P = 0.326)。强调手术复杂性的替代参数,如总时长中位数(P = 0.415)、透视时间中位数(P = 0.459)、剂量面积乘积中位数(P = 0.698)和造影剂用量中位数(P = 0.076)在所有组中显示出相似的结果。同样,围手术期并发症发生率没有显著差异,主要限于轻微出血事件。
无论LAA的形态呈现如何变化,接受介入性LAA封闭治疗的患者在手术成功率、介入特征和安全事件方面均无显著差异。