• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用心脏计算机断层扫描血管造影的标准化成像评估左心耳封堵装置与相邻结构的关系。

Relation of left atrial appendage closure devices to topographic neighboring structures using standardized imaging by cardiac computed tomography angiography.

作者信息

Lindner Simon, Behnes Michael, Wenke Annika, Sartorius Benjamin, Dieker Wulf, Ansari Uzair, Akin Muharrem, Bertsch Thomas, Mashayekhi Kambis, Vogler Nils, Haubenreisser Holger, Schoenberg Stefan O, Borggrefe Martin, Akin Ibrahim

机构信息

First Department of Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim (UMM), Faculty of Medicine Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, European Center for AngioScience (ECAS), and DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Mannheim, Germany.

Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Cardiol. 2019 Feb;42(2):264-269. doi: 10.1002/clc.23136. Epub 2018 Dec 21.

DOI:10.1002/clc.23136
PMID:30548264
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6712306/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although left atrial appendage (LAA) anatomy and topographic relations are well understood, little is known about the impairment of neighboring structures (NBS) by an implanted left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) device. This prospective longitudinal observational study for the first time describes distances of implanted LAA closure (LAAC) devices to NBS using a standardized imaging protocol of cardiac computed tomography angiography (cCTA).

HYPOTHESIS

cCTA imaging is an eligible tool for post-implantation evaluation of LAAC devices and their relation to neighboring structures.

METHODS

cCTA data sets of consecutive patients 6 months after successful LAAC were acquired on a third generation dual-source CT system and reconstructed with a slice thickness of 0.5 mm. The standardized multi-planar reconstruction LAA occluder view for post-implantation evaluation (LOVE) algorithm was used to measure the distances to NBS in relation to LAA morphology and implanted LAAC devices.

RESULTS

A total of 48 patients (median age 80 years, 25% female) were included. Left upper pulmonary vein and circumflex artery were generally closest to occlusion devices (median 2.9 and 2.8 mm, respectively). AMPLATZER AMULET devices were closer to the mitral valve annulus than WATCHMAN devices (6.6 mm (inter quartile range [IQR] 4.9-8.6) vs 10.9 mm (IQR 7.4-14.0), P = 0.001). Distances to the left upper pulmonary vein were affected by LAA morphology, with cauliflower type having the closest proximity (1.7 mm [IQR 1.0-3.4], P = 0.048).

CONCLUSION

A standardized cCTA imaging protocol is an eligible tool to accurately measure distances to NBS. Left upper pulmonary vein and circumflex artery are closest to LAAC devices and could thus be most prone to impairment.

摘要

背景

尽管左心耳(LAA)的解剖结构和地形关系已为人熟知,但对于植入的左心耳封堵(LAAC)装置对邻近结构(NBS)的损害却知之甚少。这项前瞻性纵向观察研究首次使用心脏计算机断层血管造影(cCTA)的标准化成像方案描述了植入的LAA封堵(LAAC)装置与NBS之间的距离。

假设

cCTA成像对于LAAC装置植入后的评估及其与邻近结构的关系是一种合适的工具。

方法

在第三代双源CT系统上获取成功进行LAAC术后6个月的连续患者的cCTA数据集,并以0.5mm的层厚进行重建。使用标准化的多平面重建LAA封堵器植入后评估(LOVE)算法来测量与LAA形态和植入的LAAC装置相关的NBS距离。

结果

共纳入48例患者(中位年龄80岁,25%为女性)。左上肺静脉和回旋支动脉通常最靠近封堵装置(中位距离分别为2.9mm和2.8mm)。AMPLATZER AMULET装置比WATCHMAN装置更靠近二尖瓣环(6.6mm(四分位间距[IQR]4.9 - 8.6)对10.9mm(IQR 7.4 - 14.0),P = 0.001)。与左上肺静脉的距离受LAA形态影响,菜花型最接近(1.7mm[IQR 1.0 - 3.4],P = 0.048)。

结论

标准化的cCTA成像方案是准确测量与NBS距离的合适工具。左上肺静脉和回旋支动脉最靠近LAAC装置,因此最容易受到损害。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f67/6712306/c63ccf74f16c/CLC-42-264-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f67/6712306/6e28d29aed49/CLC-42-264-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f67/6712306/c63ccf74f16c/CLC-42-264-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f67/6712306/6e28d29aed49/CLC-42-264-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f67/6712306/c63ccf74f16c/CLC-42-264-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Relation of left atrial appendage closure devices to topographic neighboring structures using standardized imaging by cardiac computed tomography angiography.使用心脏计算机断层扫描血管造影的标准化成像评估左心耳封堵装置与相邻结构的关系。
Clin Cardiol. 2019 Feb;42(2):264-269. doi: 10.1002/clc.23136. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
2
Assessment of peri-device leaks after interventional left atrial appendage closure using standardized imaging by cardiac computed tomography angiography.使用心脏计算机断层血管造影术的标准化成像评估介入性左心耳封堵术后的器械周围渗漏情况。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Apr;35(4):725-731. doi: 10.1007/s10554-018-1493-z. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
3
Comparison of cardiac computed tomography angiography and transoesophageal echocardiography for device surveillance after left atrial appendage closure.经皮左心耳封堵术后器械监测中心脏 CT 血管造影与经食管超声心动图的比较。
EuroIntervention. 2019 Oct 20;15(8):663-670. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-01107.
4
--LAA Occluder View for post-implantation Evaluation (LOVE)--standardized imaging proposal evaluating implanted left atrial appendage occlusion devices by cardiac computed tomography.--植入后评估的左心耳封堵器视图(LOVE)--通过心脏计算机断层扫描评估植入的左心耳封堵装置的标准化成像方案。
BMC Med Imaging. 2016 Mar 24;16:25. doi: 10.1186/s12880-016-0127-y.
5
Incomplete neo-endothelialization of left atrial appendage closure devices is frequent after 6 months: a pilot imaging study.左心耳封堵装置 6 个月后不完全再内皮化是常见的:一项初步影像学研究。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Jul;37(7):2291-2298. doi: 10.1007/s10554-021-02192-5. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
6
Comparing Measurements of CT Angiography, TEE, and Fluoroscopy of the Left Atrial Appendage for Percutaneous Closure.经皮封堵术治疗时左心耳CT血管造影、经食管超声心动图和荧光透视检查测量结果的比较
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016 Apr;27(4):414-22. doi: 10.1111/jce.12909. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
7
Cardiac CT angiography for device surveillance after endovascular left atrial appendage closure.血管内左心耳封堵术后心脏CT血管造影用于器械监测
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Nov;16(11):1198-206. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jev067. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
8
One year outcome and analysis of peri-device leak of left atrial appendage occlusion devices.左心耳封堵装置器械周围漏的一年结果和分析。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2022 Jun;64(1):27-34. doi: 10.1007/s10840-021-01002-1. Epub 2021 May 17.
9
Feasibility of left atrial appendage device closure following chronically failed surgical ligation.经皮左心耳封堵术治疗慢性手术结扎失败的可行性。
Heart Rhythm. 2019 Jan;16(1):12-17. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.07.017. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
10
Long-Term Safety and Efficacy in Continued Access Left Atrial Appendage Closure Registries.延续性左心耳封堵器使用登记研究的长期安全性和有效性。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Dec 10;74(23):2878-2889. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.09.064.

引用本文的文献

1
Pulmonary artery perforation after percutaneous left atrial appendage closure: two case reports and review of literature.经皮左心耳封堵术后肺动脉穿孔:两例病例报告及文献复习
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2025 Jul 22. doi: 10.1007/s10840-025-02090-z.
2
ST-Segment Elevation During Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure.经皮左心耳封堵术期间的ST段抬高
JACC Case Rep. 2024 Jan 5;29(4):102216. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2023.102216. eCollection 2024 Feb 21.
3
Late Presentation of Pulmonary Artery-Left Atrial Appendage Fistula Formation After Left Atrial Appendage Device Closure.

本文引用的文献

1
Peri-interventional embolization of left atrial appendage occlusion devices: two manoeuvers of successful retrieval.左心耳封堵装置的围手术期栓塞:成功取出的两种操作方法。
Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2018 Feb 9;2(1):yty001. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/yty001. eCollection 2018 Mar.
2
Impact of left atrial appendage morphology on thrombus formation after successful left atrial appendage occlusion: Assessment with cardiac-computed-tomography.经心脏计算机断层扫描评估左心耳形态对左心耳封堵术后血栓形成的影响。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 26;8(1):1670. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19385-z.
3
Procedural success and intra-hospital outcome related to left atrial appendage morphology in patients that receive an interventional left atrial appendage closure.
左心耳封堵术后肺动脉-左心耳瘘形成的延迟表现
JACC Case Rep. 2020 May 20;2(5):814-818. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2020.02.025. eCollection 2020 May.
4
Systematic Review of Contiguous Vessel and Valve Injury Associated with Endocardial Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Devices.与心内膜左心耳封堵装置相关的相邻血管和瓣膜损伤的系统评价
J Atr Fibrillation. 2019 Aug 31;12(2):2256. doi: 10.4022/jafib.2256. eCollection 2019 Aug-Sep.
接受介入性左心耳封堵术患者的手术成功率及院内结局与左心耳形态相关。
Clin Cardiol. 2017 Aug;40(8):566-574. doi: 10.1002/clc.22699. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
4
2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS.2016年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)与欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)合作制定的心房颤动管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2016 Oct 7;37(38):2893-2962. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw210. Epub 2016 Aug 27.
5
--LAA Occluder View for post-implantation Evaluation (LOVE)--standardized imaging proposal evaluating implanted left atrial appendage occlusion devices by cardiac computed tomography.--植入后评估的左心耳封堵器视图(LOVE)--通过心脏计算机断层扫描评估植入的左心耳封堵装置的标准化成像方案。
BMC Med Imaging. 2016 Mar 24;16:25. doi: 10.1186/s12880-016-0127-y.
6
Left atrial appendage morphology, echocardiographic characterization, procedural data and in-hospital outcome of patients receiving left atrial appendage occlusion device implantation: a prospective observational study.接受左心耳封堵装置植入患者的左心耳形态、超声心动图特征、手术数据及院内结局:一项前瞻性观察性研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016 Jan 28;16:25. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0200-z.
7
Predicting Peri-Device Leakage of Left Atrial Appendage Device Closure Using Novel Three-Dimensional Geometric CT Analysis.使用新型三维几何CT分析预测左心耳封堵装置周围渗漏
J Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2015 Dec;23(4):211-8. doi: 10.4250/jcu.2015.23.4.211. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
8
Quantitative Evaluation of the Substantially Variable Morphology and Function of the Left Atrial Appendage and Its Relation with Adjacent Structures.左心耳形态与功能显著变异的定量评估及其与相邻结构的关系
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 31;10(7):e0126818. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126818. eCollection 2015.
9
Left circumflex coronary artery occlusion due to a left atrial appendage closure device.左心耳封堵装置导致左旋支冠状动脉闭塞
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2015;11(1):69-70. doi: 10.5114/pwki.2015.49192. Epub 2015 Mar 6.
10
CT imaging for left atrial appendage closure: a review and pictorial essay.经食管超声心动图在左心耳封堵术中的应用: 综述及影像学研究。
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2015 Mar-Apr;9(2):89-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2015.01.011. Epub 2015 Jan 24.