Lerner Michael Z, Tricoli Michael, Strome Marshall
Montefiore Medical Center, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Bronx, New York, USA.
Medrobotics Corporation, Raynham, MA, USA.
Am J Otolaryngol. 2017 Jul-Aug;38(4):447-451. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2017.04.002. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
The objective of this study was to determine if a flexible robotic system caused increased tissue reaction when accessing the oropharynx and hypopharynx compared to intubation controls in only 2 scenarios: high speed tissue impact and multiple unit insertions and retractions. The data obtained were submitted as part of the entirety of information submitted for FDA approval.
This study consisted of 5 groups of Yorkshire pigs (2 animals per group). On Day 0, all animals were intubated. For group 1 (control), a second endotracheal tube was advanced to just above the vocal cords. In abrasion groups 2 and 3, the flexible robotic system was advanced against the oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal tissues, respectively. In blunt trauma groups 4 and 5, the flexible robotic system was advanced at maximum speed (22mm/s) to collide with oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal tissues, respectively. Pre- and post-procedure endoscopic assessments of tissue reaction were performed daily for 4 days. An independent reviewer graded tissue reaction using a 0-3 point scale.
Tissue reaction scores at each observation time point for all test groups were less than or equal to control scores except for one instance of moderate scoring (2 out of 3) on Day 2 for an animal in the blunt trauma group where reaction was likely intubation-related rather than device impact related. Otherwise, all flexible robotic system-treated animal scores were less than 1 by Day 4.
In this limited study, the flexrobotic system afforded surgical access to the oropharynx and hypopharynx without an increased level of abrasion or tissue trauma when compared to intubation alone.
本研究的目的是确定在仅两种情况下,即高速组织撞击和多次单元插入与回缩时,与插管对照组相比,柔性机器人系统在进入口咽和下咽时是否会引起更多的组织反应。所获得的数据作为提交给美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的全部信息的一部分提交。
本研究包括5组约克夏猪(每组2只动物)。在第0天,所有动物均进行插管。对于第1组(对照组),将第二根气管内导管推进至声带上方。在磨损组2和3中,柔性机器人系统分别向口咽和下咽组织推进。在钝性创伤组4和5中,柔性机器人系统以最大速度(22毫米/秒)推进,分别与口咽和下咽组织碰撞。在4天内每天对组织反应进行术前和术后内镜评估。一名独立评审员使用0 - 3分制对组织反应进行评分。
除了钝性创伤组的一只动物在第2天出现一次中度评分(3分中的2分)外,所有测试组在每个观察时间点的组织反应评分均低于或等于对照组评分,该动物的反应可能与插管有关,而非与器械撞击有关。否则,到第4天,所有接受柔性机器人系统治疗的动物评分均低于1分。
在这项有限的研究中,与单纯插管相比,柔性机器人系统在进入口咽和下咽时不会增加磨损或组织创伤程度。