• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

咽气道呼吸压力对儿童II类下颌后缩的影响:吸气和呼气的计算流体动力学研究

Influence of pharyngeal airway respiration pressure on Class II mandibular retrusion in children: A computational fluid dynamics study of inspiration and expiration.

作者信息

Iwasaki T, Sato H, Suga H, Takemoto Y, Inada E, Saitoh I, Kakuno K, Kanomi R, Yamasaki Y

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima-City, Japan.

Division of Pediatric Dentistry, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata-City, Japan.

出版信息

Orthod Craniofac Res. 2017 May;20(2):95-101. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12145.

DOI:10.1111/ocr.12145
PMID:28414873
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine the influence of negative pressure of the pharyngeal airway on mandibular retraction during inspiration in children with nasal obstruction using the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method.

SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION

Sixty-two children were divided into Classes I, II (mandibular retrusion) and III (mandibular protrusion) malocclusion groups.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Cone-beam computed tomography data were used to reconstruct three-dimensional shapes of the nasal and pharyngeal airways. Airflow pressure was simulated using CFD to calculate nasal resistance and pharyngeal airway pressure during inspiration and expiration.

RESULTS

Nasal resistance of the Class II group was significantly higher than that of the other two groups, and oropharyngeal airway inspiration pressure in the Class II (-247.64 Pa) group was larger than that in the Class I (-43.51 Pa) and Class III (-31.81 Pa) groups (P<.001). The oropharyngeal airway inspiration-expiration pressure difference in the Class II (-27.38 Pa) group was larger than that in the Class I (-5.17 Pa) and Class III (0.68 Pa) groups (P=.006).

CONCLUSION

Large negative inspiratory pharyngeal airway pressure due to nasal obstruction in children with Class II malocclusion may be related to their retrognathia.

摘要

目的

采用计算流体动力学(CFD)方法研究鼻塞儿童吸气时咽气道负压对下颌后缩的影响。

设置与样本量

62名儿童被分为安氏I类、II类(下颌后缩)和III类(下颌前突)错牙合畸形组。

材料与方法

使用锥形束计算机断层扫描数据重建鼻和咽气道的三维形状。采用CFD模拟气流压力,计算吸气和呼气时的鼻阻力和咽气道压力。

结果

II类组的鼻阻力显著高于其他两组,II类组(-247.64 Pa)的口咽气道吸气压力大于I类组(-43.51 Pa)和III类组(-31.81 Pa)(P<0.001)。II类组(-27.38 Pa)的口咽气道吸气-呼气压力差大于I类组(-5.17 Pa)和III类组(0.68 Pa)(P=0.006)。

结论

II类错牙合畸形儿童因鼻塞导致的较大吸气性咽气道负压可能与其下颌后缩有关。

相似文献

1
Influence of pharyngeal airway respiration pressure on Class II mandibular retrusion in children: A computational fluid dynamics study of inspiration and expiration.咽气道呼吸压力对儿童II类下颌后缩的影响:吸气和呼气的计算流体动力学研究
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2017 May;20(2):95-101. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12145.
2
The effect of rapid maxillary expansion on pharyngeal airway pressure during inspiration evaluated using computational fluid dynamics.使用计算流体动力学评估快速上颌扩弓对吸气时咽气道压力的影响。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Aug;78(8):1258-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.05.004. Epub 2014 May 14.
3
Herbst appliance effects on pharyngeal airway ventilation evaluated using computational fluid dynamics.使用计算流体动力学评估Herbst矫治器对咽气道通气的影响。
Angle Orthod. 2017 May;87(3):397-403. doi: 10.2319/080616-603.1. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
4
Relationships among nasal resistance, adenoids, tonsils, and tongue posture and maxillofacial form in Class II and Class III children.II类和III类错颌儿童的鼻阻力、腺样体、扁桃体、舌姿势与颌面形态之间的关系。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017 May;151(5):929-940. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.10.027.
5
Computational fluid dynamics for the assessment of upper airway changes in skeletal Class III patients treated with mandibular setback surgery.用于评估接受下颌后缩手术治疗的骨性III类患者上气道变化的计算流体动力学
Angle Orthod. 2016 Nov;86(6):976-982. doi: 10.2319/122715-892.1. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
6
Three-dimensional evaluation of upper airway in patients with different anteroposterior skeletal patterns.不同前后骨骼模式患者上气道的三维评估
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2014 Feb;17(1):38-48. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12029. Epub 2013 Aug 26.
7
[Cone-beam CT study for the oropharyngeal airway volume and hyoid position of adults Class III skeletal malocclusion].[锥形束CT研究成人III类骨性错牙合患者的口咽气道容积及舌骨位置]
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2015 Jun;24(3):351-5.
8
Three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography analysis of enlargement of the pharyngeal airway by the Herbst appliance.Herbst矫治器扩大咽气道的三维锥形束计算机断层扫描分析
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Dec;146(6):776-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.08.017.
9
Upper airway obstuction in class II patients. Effects of Andresen activator on the anatomy of pharingeal airway passage. Cone beam evalution.II类患者的上气道阻塞。安德雷森矫治器对咽气道通道解剖结构的影响。锥形束评估。
Stomatologija. 2015;17(4):124-30.
10
CBCT analysis of pharyngeal airway volume and comparison of airway volume among patients with skeletal Class I, Class II, and Class III malocclusion: A retrospective study.锥形束 CT 分析咽腔容积及安氏Ⅰ类、Ⅱ类和Ⅲ类错颌畸形患者咽腔容积的比较:一项回顾性研究。
Cranio. 2021 Sep;39(5):379-390. doi: 10.1080/08869634.2019.1652993. Epub 2019 Aug 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Oral Implications of Herbst Device Modification: A Case Report.Herbst矫治器改良的口腔影响:一例报告
Children (Basel). 2025 Apr 22;12(5):531. doi: 10.3390/children12050531.
2
Risk of Narrow Upper Airway in Class II Children with Large Horizontal Maxillary Overjet Assessed By Acoustic Reflection: a Case-Control Study.通过声反射评估Ⅱ类水平上颌前突较大儿童的上气道狭窄风险:一项病例对照研究。
J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2024 Sep 30;15(3):e5. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2024.15305. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep.
3
The effect of airway motion and breathing phase during imaging on CFD simulations of respiratory airflow.
成像过程中气道运动和呼吸阶段对呼吸气流CFD模拟的影响。
Comput Biol Med. 2020 Dec;127:104099. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.104099. Epub 2020 Nov 1.
4
Evaluation of the pharyngeal airway using computational fluid dynamics in patients with acromegaly.利用计算流体动力学对肢端肥大症患者的咽部气道进行评估。
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2018 Mar 25;3(2):133-138. doi: 10.1002/lio2.151. eCollection 2018 Apr.