Suppr超能文献

P544评估无症状主动脉瓣狭窄患者时收缩储备的重要性。

P544The importance of contractile reserve when assessing asymptomatic patients with aortic stenosis.

作者信息

Van Zalen J J, Badiani S, Hart L, Marshall A, Patel N, Lloyd G

机构信息

Eastbourne District General Hospital, Eastbourne, United Kingdom.

Barts Health NHS Trust, Barts Heart Centre, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Dec 1;17(suppl_2):ii95-ii102. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jew248.001.

Abstract

Asymptomatic patients may exhibit symptoms during objective exercise testing, but whether symptoms are due to the obstructively of the valve (typified by the mean gradient) or underlying ventricular function remains unknown. While the mean gradient is an easy parameter to measure no consensus about the measurement of contractile reserve exists. Longitudinal abnormalities may occur in the presence of a normal ejection fraction and the augmentation of these parameters is poorly described. To obtain an objective regarding patients exercise ability is best determined using cardiopulmonary exercise testing. We therefore examined echocardiographic predictors of exercise ability during cardiopulmonary exercise testing.24 asymptomatic patients with moderate to severe or severe aortic stenosis and preserved ejection fraction underwent stress echocardiography with simultaneous cardiopulmonary exercise testing. The primary assessment of exercise ability was the VO2peak and OUES. Echocardiography was measured at rest and during maximal exercise (defined as RER > 1)OUES and VO2peak showed a poor relationship with conventional parameters of severity including peak and mean gradients, AVA and dimensionless index, resting systolic function (by EF and TDI). During exercise systolic augmentation had a good relationship with exercise ability but the exercise mean gradient and exercise LVEF did not.Longitudinal systolic function and particularly systolic augmentation is the strongest predictor of exercise ability when compared to conventional measures of severity.VO2peakOUESS' exerciseRho=0.69 (p=0.001)R= 0.71 (p=0.001)S' restRho=0.52 (p=0.01)R= 0.44 (p=ns)Rest AV max VRho= 0.09 (p=ns)R= -0.08 (p=ns)Rest AV mean PGRho= 0.34 (p=ns)R=-0.10 (p=ns)Exercise AV max VRho=0.43 (p=0.05)R=0.23 (p=ns)Exercise AVmean PGRho= 0.51 (p=0.001)R=0.26 (p=ns)Rest AVARho=0.40 (p=ns)Rho=0.46 (p=0.04)Dimensionless indexRho=0.15 (p=ns)R=0.13 (p=ns)LVEF restRho=-0.18 (p=ns)R=-0.32 (p=ns)LVEF exerciseRho=0.18 (p=ns)R=0.17 (p=ns)S' - systolic velocity; V - velocity; AV - aortic valve; AVA- aortic valve area; LVEF - left ventricular ejection fraction.

摘要

无症状患者在客观运动测试期间可能会出现症状,但这些症状是由于瓣膜阻塞(以平均压差为代表)还是潜在的心室功能所致仍不清楚。虽然平均压差是一个易于测量的参数,但关于收缩储备的测量尚无共识。在射血分数正常的情况下可能会出现纵向异常,而这些参数的增加情况描述甚少。要客观评估患者的运动能力,最好使用心肺运动测试。因此,我们研究了心肺运动测试期间运动能力的超声心动图预测指标。24例中度至重度或重度主动脉瓣狭窄且射血分数保留的无症状患者接受了负荷超声心动图检查,并同时进行心肺运动测试。运动能力的主要评估指标是峰值摄氧量(VO2peak)和氧摄取效率斜率(OUES)。在静息状态和最大运动时(定义为呼吸交换率>1)进行超声心动图测量。OUES和VO2peak与包括峰值和平均压差、主动脉瓣面积(AVA)和无量纲指数、静息收缩功能(通过射血分数和组织多普勒成像[TDI])在内的传统严重程度参数之间关系不佳。运动期间收缩期增强与运动能力关系良好,但运动平均压差和运动左心室射血分数(LVEF)则不然。与传统的严重程度测量指标相比,纵向收缩功能尤其是收缩期增强是运动能力的最强预测指标。

VO2peak

OUES

运动

相关系数(Rho)=0.69(p=0.001)

相关系数(R)=0.71(p=0.001)

静息状态下S'

相关系数(Rho)=0.52(p=0.01)

相关系数(R)=0.44(p=无统计学意义)

静息状态下主动脉瓣最大流速(AV max V)

相关系数(Rho)=0.09(p=无统计学意义)

相关系数(R)=-0.08(p=无统计学意义)

静息状态下主动脉瓣平均压差(AV mean PG)

相关系数(Rho)=0.34(p=无统计学意义)

相关系数(R)=-0.10(p=无统计学意义)

运动状态下主动脉瓣最大流速(AV max V)

相关系数(Rho)=0.43(p=0.05)

相关系数(R)=0.23(p=无统计学意义)

运动状态下主动脉瓣平均压差(AV mean PG)

相关系数(Rho)=0.51(p=0.001)

相关系数(R)=0.26(p=无统计学意义)

静息状态下主动脉瓣面积(AVA)

相关系数(Rho)=0.40(p=无统计学意义)

相关系数(Rho)=0.46(p=0.04)

无量纲指数

相关系数(Rho)=0.15(p=无统计学意义)

相关系数(R)=0.13(p=无统计学意义)

静息状态下左心室射血分数(LVEF rest)

相关系数(Rho)=-0.18(p=无统计学意义)

相关系数(R)=-0.32(p=无统计学意义)

运动状态下左心室射血分数(LVEF exercise)

相关系数(Rho)=0.18(p=无统计学意义)

相关系数(R)=0.17(p=无统计学意义)

S' - 收缩期速度;V - 速度;AV - 主动脉瓣;AVA - 主动脉瓣面积;LVEF - 左心室射血分数

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验