• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

智力裸奔:教师展现思想(与内心)的价值。

Intellectual streaking: The value of teachers exposing minds (and hearts).

作者信息

Bearman Margaret, Molloy Elizabeth

机构信息

a Centre for Research and Assessment in Digital Learning (CRADLE) , Deakin University , Geelong , Australia.

b Department of Medical Education , University of Melbourne , Melbourne , Australia.

出版信息

Med Teach. 2017 Dec;39(12):1284-1285. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1308475. Epub 2017 Apr 18.

DOI:10.1080/0142159X.2017.1308475
PMID:28415892
Abstract

As teachers we often ask learners to be vulnerable and yet present ourselves as high status, knowledgeable experts, often with pre-prepared scripts. This paper investigates the metaphoric notion of "intellectual streaking" - the nimble exposure of a teacher's thought processes, dilemmas, or failures - as a way of modeling both reflection-in-action and resilience. While there is a tension between credibility and vulnerability, both of which are necessary for trust, we argue that taking a few risks and revealing deficits in knowledge or performance can be illuminating and valuable for all parties.

摘要

作为教师,我们常常要求学习者敞开心扉,而我们自己却以高高在上、知识渊博的专家形象示人,还常常照着预先准备好的讲稿讲课。本文探讨了“思想裸奔”这一隐喻概念——即教师思维过程、困境或失败的灵活展现——以此作为一种示范行动中的反思和恢复力的方式。虽然可信度和袒露心扉之间存在着矛盾,而这两者对于信任来说都是必要的,但我们认为冒一些风险并暴露知识或表现上的不足对各方而言都可能具有启发性且很有价值。

相似文献

1
Intellectual streaking: The value of teachers exposing minds (and hearts).智力裸奔:教师展现思想(与内心)的价值。
Med Teach. 2017 Dec;39(12):1284-1285. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1308475. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
2
On the self-renewal of teachers.论教师的自我更新
J Vet Med Educ. 2011 Fall;38(3):235-41. doi: 10.3138/jvme.38.3.235.
3
Elements of instruction in allied health: do faculty and students value the same things?联合健康领域的教学要素:教师和学生看重的是同样的东西吗?
J Allied Health. 2003 Fall;32(3):167-72.
4
Trust Between Teachers and Learners.师生之间的信任。
JAMA. 2019 Jun 11;321(22):2157-2158. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.22130.
5
An interview study of how clinical teachers develop skills to attend to different level learners.一项关于临床教师如何培养关注不同水平学习者技能的访谈研究。
Med Teach. 2016 Jun;38(6):578-84. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1073238. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
6
Integrating the teaching role into one's identity: a qualitative study of beginning undergraduate medical teachers.将教学角色融入个人身份认同:一项针对本科医学初任教师的质性研究。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2017 Aug;22(3):601-622. doi: 10.1007/s10459-016-9694-5. Epub 2016 Jun 18.
7
Coping in an HIV/AIDS-dominated context: teachers promoting resilience in schools.在 HIV/AIDS 主导的背景下应对:在学校中促进韧性的教师。
Health Educ Res. 2011 Aug;26(4):596-613. doi: 10.1093/her/cyr016. Epub 2011 Mar 25.
8
What do faculty feel about teaching in this school? assessment of medical education environment by teachers.教师对在这所学校教学有何看法?教师对医学教育环境的评估。
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2017 Jan-Apr;30(1):68-74. doi: 10.4103/1357-6283.210500.
9
Primary school teacher's knowledge and attitudes toward children with epilepsy.小学教师对癫痫儿童的认知与态度。
Seizure. 2014 Apr;23(4):280-3. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2013.12.010. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
10
An empirical study on the relationship between teacher's judgments and fit statistics of the partial credit model.关于教师判断与部分计分模型拟合统计量之间关系的实证研究。
J Appl Meas. 2009;10(1):84-96.

引用本文的文献

1
What can simulation educators learn from the reluctant participant? An exploration of the factors influencing engagement amongst adult learners participating in paediatric simulation training.模拟教育工作者能从不情愿的参与者身上学到什么?对影响参与儿科模拟培训的成年学习者参与度的因素的探索。
Adv Simul (Lond). 2025 Feb 13;10(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s41077-025-00331-9.
2
A qualitative exploration of feedback experience among final-year physiotherapy students using activity theory.运用活动理论对物理治疗专业最后一年学生的反馈体验进行质性探索。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jan 20;25(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06635-8.
3
Specialists' learning from facilitating group peer telementoring: a qualitative study.
专家从促进小组同伴远程指导中学习:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):1485. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06424-9.
4
More Than Maintaining Competence: A Qualitative Study of How Physicians Conceptualize and Engage in Lifelong Learning.超越保持胜任力:一项关于医生如何概念化和参与终身学习的定性研究。
Perspect Med Educ. 2024 Jul 4;13(1):380-391. doi: 10.5334/pme.1327. eCollection 2024.
5
The Physiology of Teaching: Getting the Balance right.教学的生理学:把握好平衡。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2020 Sep 15;9:196. doi: 10.15694/mep.2020.000196.1. eCollection 2020.
6
Fostering uncertainty tolerance in anatomy education: Lessons learned from how humanities, arts and social science (HASS) educators develop learners' uncertainty tolerance.在解剖学教育中培养不确定性容忍度:从人文学科、艺术和社会科学(HASS)教育者如何培养学习者的不确定性容忍度中获得的经验教训。
Anat Sci Educ. 2023 Jan;16(1):128-147. doi: 10.1002/ase.2174. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
7
Development of the Feedback Quality Instrument: a guide for health professional educators in fostering learner-centred discussions.反馈质量工具的开发:以学习者为中心的讨论为导向的卫生专业教育工作者指南。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Jul 12;21(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02722-8.
8
Finding common ground: meta-synthesis of communication frameworks found in patient communication, supervision and simulation literature.寻找共同点:患者沟通、监督和模拟文献中沟通框架的元综合。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Feb 11;20(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1922-2.