J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Jan;118(1):125-131. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2016.12.019. Epub 2017 Apr 14.
Malnutrition is a significant problem for hospitalized patients. However, the true prevalence of reported malnutrition diagnosis in real-world clinical practice is largely unknown. Using a large collaborative multi-institutional database, the rate of malnutrition diagnosis was assessed and used to assess institutional variables associated with higher rates of malnutrition diagnosis.
The aim of this study was to define the prevalence of malnutrition diagnosis reported among inpatient hospitalizations.
The University Health System Consortium (Vizient) database was retrospectively reviewed for reported rates of malnutrition diagnosis.
PARTICIPANTS/SETTING: All adult inpatient hospitalization at 105 member institutions during fiscal years 2014 and 2015 were evaluated.
Malnutrition diagnosis based on the presence of an International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision diagnosis code.
Hospital volume and publicly available hospital rankings and patient satisfaction scores were obtained. Multiple regression analysis was performed to assess the association between these variables and reported rates of malnutrition.
A total of 5,896,792 hospitalizations were identified from 105 institutions during the 2-year period. It was found that 292,754 patients (5.0%) had a malnutrition diagnosis during their hospital stay. By institution, median rate of malnutrition diagnosis during hospitalization was 4.0%, whereas the rate of severe malnutrition diagnosis was 0.9%. There was a statistically significant increase in malnutrition diagnosis from 4.0% to 4.9% between 2014 and 2015 (P<0.01). Institutional factors associated with increased diagnosis of malnutrition were higher hospital volume, hospital ranking, and patient satisfaction scores (P<0.01).
Missing a malnutrition diagnosis appears to be a universal issue because the rate of malnutrition diagnosis was consistently low across academic medical centers. Institutional variables were associated with the prevalence of malnutrition diagnosis, which suggests that institutional culture influences malnutrition diagnosis. Quality improvement efforts aimed at improved structure and process appear to be needed to improve the identification of malnutrition.
营养不良是住院患者面临的一个重大问题。然而,在真实的临床实践中,真正的营养不良诊断报告率很大程度上仍是未知的。本研究利用大型协作式多机构数据库,评估了营养不良诊断率,并用于评估与更高的营养不良诊断率相关的机构变量。
本研究旨在确定报告的住院患者营养不良诊断的流行率。
回顾性审查了大学卫生系统联盟(Vizient)数据库中报告的营养不良诊断率。
参与者/设置:评估了在 2014 年和 2015 年财政年度 105 家成员机构的所有成年住院患者。
根据国际疾病分类第九版诊断代码存在来判断营养不良诊断。
获取了医院容量以及公开的医院排名和患者满意度评分。进行了多元回归分析,以评估这些变量与报告的营养不良率之间的关联。
在 2 年期间,从 105 家机构中确定了 5896792 例住院患者。结果发现,5896792 例住院患者中有 292754 例(5.0%)在住院期间存在营养不良诊断。按机构划分,住院期间营养不良诊断的中位数率为 4.0%,而严重营养不良诊断率为 0.9%。2014 年至 2015 年,营养不良诊断率从 4.0%显著增加到 4.9%(P<0.01)。与营养不良诊断增加相关的机构因素是更高的医院容量、医院排名和患者满意度评分(P<0.01)。
似乎普遍存在营养不良诊断漏诊的情况,因为在学术医疗中心中,营养不良诊断率一直很低。机构变量与营养不良诊断的流行率相关,这表明机构文化影响营养不良诊断。似乎需要进行质量改进努力,以改善结构和流程,从而提高营养不良的识别率。