Bilancini S, Lucchi M, Curri S B
Centre d'Etude des Maladies Vasculaires, Frosinone-Italie, Milan.
Phlebologie. 1988 Jan-Mar;41(1):251-61.
Nosologically, in ulcerative-mutilating acropathies (U.M.A.), it is customary to differentiate the usual forms of the disease (Thevenard's disease) which develop primarily and the secondary forms (U.M.A. or, better, pseudo-U.M.A.), in which the syndrome is secondary to a known pathologic process and which represent a symptom and not a disease. The link between these two nosological entities is the pseudo-syringomyeli U.M.A. of the lower extremities, or Bureau-Barrier's disease. This disease is exclusively seen in alcoholics and is similar to the neurological alterations observed in alcoholic polyneuropathies. Some authors consider this form as an ulcerative-mutilating acropathy (symptomatic U.M.A.). The objective of our research is to demonstrate the similarity between the microcirculation alterations in patients with Bureau-Barriere's disease and patients with alcoholic polyneuropathy without trophic lesions. For this purpose, we have biopsied the pulp of the great toe, according to the method described by Curri-Schendorf in three patients with Bureau-Barriere's disease, 46, 50 and 65 year-old respectively, and three patients with alcoholic polyneuropathy, 34, 54 and 63 years-old respectively. All these patients presented a normal macrocirculation, without any diabetes, nor disease prone to alter the microcirculation. The results obtained, in a limited series however, permit to state that it is possible to unify alcoholic polyneuropathy and Bureau-Barriere's disease in a single clinical and nosological entity, and to say that the latter only represents an evolution of the former. Besides, we have notices that microcirculation alterations, although non-specific, are extensive and occur early, permitting to suspect a pathogenic process related to a true alcoholic histo-angeitis which, for us, represent the pathogenic basis of Bureau-Barriere's disease.
在疾病分类学上,对于溃疡性致残性肢端病(U.M.A.),通常会区分主要发病的常见疾病形式(特韦纳尔氏病)和继发形式(U.M.A.,或者更确切地说是假性U.M.A.),后者的综合征继发于已知的病理过程,仅代表一种症状而非一种疾病。这两种疾病分类实体之间的联系是下肢假性脊髓空洞症U.M.A.,即比罗-巴里埃氏病。这种疾病仅见于酗酒者,与酒精性多发性神经病中观察到的神经病变相似。一些作者将这种形式视为溃疡性致残性肢端病(症状性U.M.A.)。我们研究的目的是证明比罗-巴里埃氏病患者与无营养性损害的酒精性多发性神经病患者的微循环改变之间的相似性。为此,我们按照库里-申多夫描述的方法,分别对3例比罗-巴里埃氏病患者(年龄分别为46岁、50岁和65岁)和3例酒精性多发性神经病患者(年龄分别为34岁、54岁和63岁)的大脚趾趾腹进行了活检。所有这些患者的体循环均正常,无任何糖尿病,也没有易于改变微循环的疾病。然而,在这个有限的病例系列中获得的结果表明,有可能将酒精性多发性神经病和比罗-巴里埃氏病统一在一个单一的临床和疾病分类实体中,并可以说后者只是前者的一种演变。此外,我们注意到微循环改变虽然是非特异性的,但广泛且出现较早,这使得人们怀疑存在一种与真正的酒精性组织血管炎相关的致病过程,对我们来说,这代表了比罗-巴里埃氏病的致病基础。