• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改良双侧亚历山大位片中动态后移的量化及其与急性肩锁关节不稳患者临床和影像学参数的相关性

Quantification of dynamic posterior translation in modified bilateral Alexander views and correlation with clinical and radiological parameters in patients with acute acromioclavicular joint instability.

作者信息

Minkus Marvin, Hann Carmen, Scheibel Markus, Kraus Natascha

机构信息

Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017 Jun;137(6):845-852. doi: 10.1007/s00402-017-2691-1. Epub 2017 Apr 17.

DOI:10.1007/s00402-017-2691-1
PMID:28417201
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Classification of AC-joint instability is based on radiologic evaluation of anteroposterior (a.p.) stress views of both shoulders, neglecting the horizontal component of instability. Recent studies have proposed an association of dynamic posterior translation (DPT) and inferior clinical results. The purpose of this study was to quantify DPT in modified Alexander views and correlate it with other radiological and clinical data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-two patients (4 f, 28 m, mean age 34.1) with acute AC-joint dislocation (16 = RW III, 16 = RW V) underwent radiological examination including bilateral a.p. stress views with measurement of the coracoclavicular distance (CCD) and bilateral modified Alexander views with different approaches to quantify DPT (overlapping area OA, overlapping length OL). In addition, the Constant Score, Subjective Shoulder Value, Taft Score (TF), and the Acromioclavicular Joint Instability Score (ACJI) were obtained.

RESULTS

In Rockwood (RW) type III injuries, a mean CCD of 15.8 (9.8-22.8) mm, OA of 50.9 (0-216.6) mm, and OL of 6.5 (-4.7-17.9) mm were found. RW V patients showed a CCD of 23.1 (13.7-32.0) mm; OA 7.0 (0-92.3) mm; and OL -4.8 (-19.6-9.8) mm. Particularly in RW III the CCD, OA and OL revealed significant correlation with the ACJI (r = -0.64/r = 0.72/r = 0.68, p < 0.05) and TF (r = -0.56/r = 0.68/r = 0.51, p < 0.05). The proposed quantification tools for DPT were found to have a moderate-to-strong correlation with the score results, especially with AC-joint specific scores. RW type V injuries had a moderate correlation with clinical parameters (OA with ACJI: r = 0.44, p > 0.05 and OL with TF: r = -0.45, p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Measuring the OL is a convenient way for quantifying DPT in modified Alexander views. It showed significant correlation with clinical scores, indicating the relevance of DPT in patients with AC-joint injury.

摘要

引言

肩锁关节不稳定的分类基于双肩前后位应力视图的放射学评估,而忽略了不稳定的水平分量。最近的研究提出动态后向平移(DPT)与较差的临床结果相关。本研究的目的是在改良亚历山大视图中量化DPT,并将其与其他放射学和临床数据相关联。

材料与方法

32例急性肩锁关节脱位患者(4例女性,28例男性,平均年龄34.1岁)(16例为Rockwood III型,16例为Rockwood V型)接受了放射学检查,包括双侧前后位应力视图以测量喙锁距离(CCD),以及双侧改良亚历山大视图,采用不同方法量化DPT(重叠面积OA、重叠长度OL)。此外,还获得了Constant评分、主观肩关节评分、Taft评分(TF)和肩锁关节不稳定评分(ACJI)。

结果

在Rockwood(RW)III型损伤中,平均CCD为15.8(9.8 - 22.8)mm,OA为50.9(0 - 216.6)mm,OL为6.5( - 4.7 - 17.9)mm。RW V型患者的CCD为23.1(13.7 - 32.0)mm;OA为7.0(0 - 92.3)mm;OL为 - 4.8( - 19.6 - 9.8)mm。特别是在RW III型中,CCD、OA和OL与ACJI(r = - 0.64/r = 0.72/r = 0.68,p < 0.05)和TF(r = - 0.56/r = 0.68/r = 0.51,p < 0.05)显示出显著相关性。发现所提出的DPT量化工具与评分结果具有中度至强相关性,尤其是与肩锁关节特异性评分。RW V型损伤与临床参数具有中度相关性(OA与ACJI:r = 0.44,p > 0.05;OL与TF:r = - 0.45,p > 0.05)。

结论

测量OL是在改良亚历山大视图中量化DPT的便捷方法。它与临床评分显示出显著相关性,表明DPT在肩锁关节损伤患者中的相关性。

相似文献

1
Quantification of dynamic posterior translation in modified bilateral Alexander views and correlation with clinical and radiological parameters in patients with acute acromioclavicular joint instability.改良双侧亚历山大位片中动态后移的量化及其与急性肩锁关节不稳患者临床和影像学参数的相关性
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017 Jun;137(6):845-852. doi: 10.1007/s00402-017-2691-1. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
2
Combined arthroscopically assisted coraco- and acromioclavicular stabilization of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations.关节镜辅助下治疗急性高分级肩锁关节脱位的锁骨-肩峰端和肩锁关节稳定术。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Jan;26(1):212-220. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4643-2. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
3
Arthroscopically assisted stabilization of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations in a coracoclavicular Double-TightRope technique: V-shaped versus parallel drill hole orientation.关节镜辅助下喙锁双袢钛缆技术治疗急性重度肩锁关节脱位:V 形与平行钻孔方向比较。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013 Oct;133(10):1431-40. doi: 10.1007/s00402-013-1804-8. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
4
The ligamentous injury pattern in acute acromioclavicular dislocations and its impact on clinical and radiographic parameters.急性肩锁关节脱位的韧带损伤模式及其对临床和影像学参数的影响。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Apr;30(4):795-805. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.10.026. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
5
Surgery improves the clinical and radiological outcome in Rockwood type IV dislocations, whereas Rockwood type III dislocations benefit from conservative treatment.手术可改善Rockwood IV型脱位的临床和影像学结果,而Rockwood III型脱位则受益于保守治疗。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Jul;29(7):2143-2151. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06193-0. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
6
Arthroscopically assisted stabilization of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations.关节镜辅助下急性高分级肩锁关节分离的稳定。
Am J Sports Med. 2011 Jul;39(7):1507-16. doi: 10.1177/0363546511399379. Epub 2011 Mar 24.
7
Dynamic instability of the acromioclavicular joint: A new classification for acute AC joint separation.肩锁关节的动态不稳定:急性肩锁关节分离的一种新分类
Obere Extrem. 2018;13(4):279-285. doi: 10.1007/s11678-018-0469-x. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
8
Sonographic Measurement of Dynamic Horizontal Instability in Acromioclavicular Joint Instability: Description of a Simple Technique and Correlation to Radiographic Parameters.超声测量肩锁关节不稳定的动态水平不稳定:一种简单技术的描述及其与影像学参数的相关性。
J Ultrasound Med. 2022 Feb;41(2):409-415. doi: 10.1002/jum.15719. Epub 2021 May 6.
9
Dynamic radiologic evaluation of horizontal instability in acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations.动态放射学评估急性肩锁关节脱位中的水平不稳定。
Am J Sports Med. 2010 Jun;38(6):1188-95. doi: 10.1177/0363546510361951. Epub 2010 Apr 1.
10
Management of Acute High-Grade Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations: Comparable Clinical and Radiological Outcomes After Bidirectional Arthroscopic-Assisted Stabilization With the Single Low-Profile Suture Button Technique Versus Double-Suture Button Technique.急性高度肩锁关节脱位的治疗:采用单低轮廓缝线纽扣技术与双缝线纽扣技术双向关节镜辅助稳定术后的临床和放射学结果比较
Arthroscopy. 2023 Nov;39(11):2283-2290. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.05.015. Epub 2023 May 23.

引用本文的文献

1
No Short-Term Effects of Acromioclavicular Joint Augmentation in Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Stabilization Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial on 70 Patients.肩锁关节增强术在急性肩锁关节稳定手术中无短期效果:一项针对70例患者的随机对照临床试验
J Clin Med. 2025 May 2;14(9):3161. doi: 10.3390/jcm14093161.
2
Efficacy of allogeneic tendon material coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction combined with Kirschner wire and titanium alloy hook plate material fixation in the treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation.同种异体肌腱材料喙锁韧带重建联合克氏针及钛合金钩钢板材料固定治疗肩锁关节脱位的疗效
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Apr 8;12:1388905. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1388905. eCollection 2024.
3
Concomitant Glenohumeral Pathologies in Patients with Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations: How Do Acute and Chronic Instabilities Differ?
肩锁关节脱位患者合并的盂肱关节病变:急性和慢性不稳定有何不同?
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 17;13(6):1723. doi: 10.3390/jcm13061723.
4
Position of scapula and clavicle in acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations: depressed scapula or elevated distal clavicle?急性肩锁关节脱位时肩胛骨与锁骨的位置:肩胛骨下移还是锁骨远端上抬?
JSES Int. 2023 Jul 13;7(6):2296-2303. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.06.011. eCollection 2023 Nov.
5
Clinical and anatomical outcomes of isolated coracoclavicular fixation after acromioclavicular joint injury: is it stable enough or is additional horizontal fixation necessary?肩锁关节损伤后单纯喙锁固定的临床及解剖学结果:其稳定性是否足够,还是需要额外的水平固定?
JSES Int. 2022 Oct 30;7(1):113-120. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.10.001. eCollection 2023 Jan.
6
The Reliability of Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation Classification Systems: A Comparison Between the Rockwood and Kraus Classifications.肩锁关节脱位分类系统的可靠性:Rockwood分类与Kraus分类的比较
Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Feb 17;11(2):23259671221149391. doi: 10.1177/23259671221149391. eCollection 2023 Feb.
7
Reliability of the ISAKOS Modification to Subclassify Rockwood Type III Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries.ISAKOS对RockwoodⅢ型肩锁关节损伤进行亚分类的可靠性。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Dec 19;10(12):23259671221133379. doi: 10.1177/23259671221133379. eCollection 2022 Dec.
8
Is coracoclavicular ossification a complication or a good prognostic factor after surgical treatment of acromioclavicular joint injury?喙锁骨化是肩锁关节损伤手术治疗后的并发症还是良好的预后因素?
JSES Int. 2022 May 19;6(5):769-774. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.04.009. eCollection 2022 Sep.
9
The Morphology of the Acromioclavicular Joint Does Not Influence the Postoperative Outcome Following Acute Stabilization-A Case Series of 81 Patients.肩锁关节的形态不影响急性稳定术后的结果——81例患者的病例系列研究
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022 Apr 15;4(3):e835-e842. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.09.007. eCollection 2022 Jun.
10
The "Chiang Mai Lean Forward" Radiographic View for Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries: A Cadaveric Study.用于肩锁关节损伤的“清迈前倾”X线视图:一项尸体研究
Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Mar 21;10(3):23259671221084284. doi: 10.1177/23259671221084284. eCollection 2022 Mar.