Kovesi Thomas
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Front Pediatr. 2017 Apr 3;5:62. doi: 10.3389/fped.2017.00062. eCollection 2017.
Chronic, long-term respiratory morbidity (CRM) is common in patients with a history of repaired congenital esophageal atresia, typically associated with tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF). EA/TEF patients are at high risk of having aspiration, and retrospective studies have associated CRM with both recurrent aspiration and atopy. However, studies evaluating the association between CRM in this population and either aspiration or atopy have reported conflicting results. Furthermore, CRM in this population may be due to other related conditions as well, such as tracheomalacia and/or recurrent infections. Aspiration is difficult to confirm, short of lung biopsy. Moreover, even within the largest evidence base assessing the association between CRM and aspiration, which has evaluated the potential relationship between gastroesophageal reflux and asthma, findings are contradictory. Studies attempting to relate CRM to prior aspiration events may inadequately estimate the frequency and severity of previous aspiration episodes. There is convincing evidence documenting that chronic, massive aspiration in patients with repaired EA/TEF is associated with the development of bronchiectasis. While chronic aspiration is likely associated with other CRM in patients with repaired EA/TEF, this does not appear to have been confirmed by the data currently available. Prospective studies that systematically evaluate aspiration risk and allergic disease in patients with repaired EA/TEF and document subsequent CRM will be needed to clarify the causes of CRM in this population. Given the prevalence of CRM, patients with repaired EA/TEF should ideally receive regular follow-up by multidisciplinary teams with expertise in this condition, throughout both childhood and adulthood.
慢性长期呼吸道疾病(CRM)在有先天性食管闭锁修复病史的患者中很常见,通常与气管食管瘘(EA/TEF)有关。EA/TEF患者有很高的误吸风险,回顾性研究已将CRM与反复误吸和特应性联系起来。然而,评估该人群中CRM与误吸或特应性之间关联的研究报告了相互矛盾的结果。此外,该人群中的CRM也可能归因于其他相关病症,如气管软化和/或反复感染。除了肺活检外,误吸很难得到证实。此外,即使在评估CRM与误吸之间关联的最大证据库中,该证据库评估了胃食管反流与哮喘之间的潜在关系,但其结果也相互矛盾。试图将CRM与既往误吸事件联系起来的研究可能无法充分估计既往误吸发作的频率和严重程度。有令人信服的证据表明,EA/TEF修复患者的慢性大量误吸与支气管扩张的发生有关。虽然慢性误吸可能与EA/TEF修复患者的其他CRM有关,但目前可得的数据似乎并未证实这一点。需要进行前瞻性研究,系统评估EA/TEF修复患者的误吸风险和过敏性疾病,并记录随后的CRM,以阐明该人群中CRM的病因。鉴于CRM的患病率,EA/TEF修复患者理想情况下应在整个儿童期和成年期接受多学科团队的定期随访,这些团队在这方面具有专业知识。