Farquhar Julia, Lie Desiree, Chan Angelique, Ow Mandy, Vidyarthi Arpana
Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore City, Singapore.
Acad Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;42(1):48-57. doi: 10.1007/s40596-017-0703-7. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
In order to protect medical students from burnout and its untoward psychiatric effects, it is imperative to understand their stress, burnout, coping, and resilience experiences. This study aimed to derive collective definitions from the medical student perspective, to identify common themes of students' experiences, and to distinguish pre-clinical and clinical year students' experiences relating to these four constructs.
The authors conducted focus groups of medical students in Singapore across 4 years using a semi-structured question guide. Participants shared their understanding, experiences, and the relationships between stress, burnout, coping, and resilience. Coders independently evaluated construct definitions and derived common themes through an iterative process, and compared transcripts of pre-clinical and clinical year students to determine differences in experience over time.
Nine focus groups (54 students, 28 females, mean age 24.3) were conducted. Students identified common definitions for each construct. Nine themes emerged within three domains: (1) relating constructs to personal experience, (2) interrelating stress, burnout, coping, and resilience, and (3) understanding the necessity of stress. Compared to clinical students, pre-clinical students reported theory-based rather than reality-based experiences and exam-induced stress, defined constructs using present rather than future situations, and described constructs as independent rather than interrelated.
This sample of medical students in Singapore shares a common understanding of stress, burnout, coping, and resilience, but experiences these uniquely. They perceive a positive role for stress. These findings build upon prior literature, suggesting an interrelationship between stress and its related constructs and adding the novel perspective of students from an Asian country.
为保护医学生免受职业倦怠及其不良精神影响,了解他们的压力、职业倦怠、应对方式和心理韧性体验至关重要。本研究旨在从医学生的角度得出集体定义,识别学生体验的共同主题,并区分临床前和临床阶段学生在这四个概念方面的体验。
作者在4年时间里,使用半结构化问题指南,对新加坡的医学生进行了焦点小组访谈。参与者分享了他们对压力、职业倦怠、应对方式和心理韧性的理解、体验以及它们之间的关系。编码人员通过迭代过程独立评估概念定义并得出共同主题,并比较临床前和临床阶段学生的访谈记录,以确定随时间推移体验上的差异。
共进行了9个焦点小组访谈(54名学生,28名女性,平均年龄24.3岁)。学生们为每个概念确定了共同定义。在三个领域出现了九个主题:(1)将概念与个人经历联系起来;(2)将压力、职业倦怠、应对方式和心理韧性相互联系起来;(3)理解压力的必要性。与临床阶段的学生相比,临床前阶段的学生报告的是基于理论而非现实的经历以及考试引发的压力,用当前而非未来的情况来定义概念,并且将概念描述为相互独立而非相互关联的。
新加坡的这一医学生样本对压力、职业倦怠、应对方式和心理韧性有着共同的理解,但体验方式独特。他们认为压力具有积极作用。这些发现基于先前的文献,表明压力与其相关概念之间存在相互关系,并增加了来自亚洲国家学生的新视角。