Spencer Sarah, Clegg Judy, Lowe Hilary, Stackhouse Joy
Department of Human Communication Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
City University London, London, UK.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2017 Sep;52(5):652-668. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12309. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
There is some evidence that vocabulary intervention is effective for children, although further research is needed to confirm the impact of intervention within contexts of social disadvantage. Very little is known about the effectiveness of interventions to increase adolescent knowledge of cross-curriculum words.
To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention programme designed to develop adolescents' knowledge of cross-curriculum words.
METHODS & PROCEDURES: Participants were 35 adolescents aged between 12 and 14 years who were at risk of educational underachievement with low scores on a range of assessments. Participants received a 10-week intervention programme in small groups, targeting 10 cross-curriculum words (e.g., 'summarize'). This was evaluated using a bespoke outcome measure (the Word Knowledge Profile). The study involved an AABA design, with a repeated baseline, delayed intervention cohort and blind assessment. Intervention included both semantic and phonological information about the target words and involved the adolescents using the words in multiple contexts.
OUTCOMES & RESULTS: Results were promising and participants' knowledge of the targeted words significantly increased following intervention. Progress was demonstrated on the Word Knowledge Profile on the item requiring participants to define the word (for the summer intervention group only). This increase in depth of knowledge was seen on taught words but not on matched non-taught words.
CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: Cross-curriculum words are not consistently understood by adolescents at risk of low educational attainment within a low socio-economic context. A 10-week intervention programme resulted in some increases to the depth of knowledge of targeted cross-curriculum words.
有证据表明词汇干预对儿童有效,不过仍需进一步研究以确认在社会弱势背景下干预的影响。对于旨在增加青少年跨学科词汇知识的干预措施的有效性,人们了解甚少。
评估一项旨在培养青少年跨学科词汇知识的干预计划的有效性。
参与者为35名年龄在12至14岁之间、在一系列评估中得分较低、有学业成绩不佳风险的青少年。参与者以小组形式接受了为期10周的干预计划,目标是10个跨学科词汇(如“总结”)。使用定制的结果测量工具(词汇知识概况)对其进行评估。该研究采用AABA设计,包括重复基线、延迟干预队列和盲法评估。干预包括关于目标词汇的语义和语音信息,并让青少年在多种语境中使用这些词汇。
结果很有希望,干预后参与者对目标词汇的知识显著增加。在词汇知识概况中要求参与者定义词汇的项目上(仅针对夏季干预组)显示出了进步。在所学词汇上观察到了知识深度的增加,但在匹配的未学词汇上没有。
在社会经济地位较低的背景下,有学业成绩低风险的青少年对跨学科词汇的理解并不一致。一项为期10周的干预计划使目标跨学科词汇的知识深度有所增加。