Moor House School, Oxted, UK; Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2014 Jan-Feb;49(1):30-48. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12047. Epub 2013 Sep 11.
Little evidence exists for the effectiveness of therapy for children with receptive language difficulties, particularly those whose difficulties are severe and persistent.
To establish the effectiveness of explicit speech and language therapy with visual support for secondary school-aged children with language impairments focusing on comprehension of coordinating conjunctions in a randomized control trial with an assessor blind to group status.
METHODS & PROCEDURES: Fourteen participants (aged 11;3-16;1) with severe RELI (mean standard scores: CELF4 ELS = 48, CELF4 RLS = 53 and TROG-2 = 57), but higher non-verbal (Matrices = 83) and visual perceptual skills (Test of Visual Perceptual Skills (TVPS) = 86) were randomly assigned to two groups: therapy versus waiting controls. In Phase 1, the therapy group received eight 30-min individual sessions of explicit teaching with visual support (Shape Coding) with their usual SLT. In Phase 2, the waiting controls received the same therapy. The participants' comprehension was tested pre-, post-Phase 1 and post-Phase 2 therapy on (1) a specific test of the targeted conjunctions, (2) the TROG-2 and (3) a test of passives.
OUTCOMES & RESULTS: After Phase 1, the therapy group showed significantly more progress than the waiting controls on the targeted conjunctions (d = 1.6) and overall TROG-2 standard score (d = 1.4). The two groups did not differ on the passives test. After Phase 2, the waiting controls made similar progress to those in the original therapy group, who maintained their previous progress. Neither group showed progress on passives. When the two groups were combined, significant progress was found on the specific conjunctions (d = 1.3) and TROG-2 raw (d = 1.1) and standard scores (d = 0.9). Correlations showed no measures taken (including Matrices and TVPS) correlated significantly with progress on the targeted conjunctions or the TROG-2.
CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: Four hours of Shape Coding therapy led to significant gains on comprehension of coordinating conjunctions which were maintained after 4 months. Given the significant progress at a group level and the lack of reliable predictors of progress, this approach could be offered to other children with similar difficulties to the participants. However, the intervention was delivered one-to-one by speech and language therapists, thus the effectiveness of this therapy method with other methods of delivery remains to be evaluated.
针对接受性语言障碍儿童,尤其是那些严重且持续存在语言障碍的儿童,疗效确切的治疗方法证据有限。
通过一项评估者对分组情况设盲的随机对照试验,评估针对理解并列连词而进行的显性言语和语言治疗联合视觉支持对中学年龄段语言障碍儿童的疗效。
14 名参与者(年龄 11 岁 3 至 16 岁 11,平均标准分数:CELF4 ELS=48,CELF4 RLS=53,TROG-2=57)患有严重的 RELI(可理解语言表达标准),但非言语(矩阵推理测试=83)和视觉感知技能(视觉感知技能测试=86)较高。他们被随机分配到两组:治疗组和等待对照组。在第 1 阶段,治疗组接受 8 次 30 分钟的个体显性教学(形状编码)治疗,同时接受其常规言语治疗。在第 2 阶段,等待对照组接受相同的治疗。在第 1 阶段和第 2 阶段治疗前后,参与者的理解能力分别在(1)针对特定连词的测试,(2)TROG-2 测试和(3)被动语态测试上进行测试。
在第 1 阶段之后,治疗组在目标连词(d=1.6)和总体 TROG-2 标准分(d=1.4)上的进步明显优于等待对照组。两组在被动语态测试上没有差异。在第 2 阶段后,等待对照组取得了与原始治疗组相似的进步,而原始治疗组保持了之前的进步。两组在被动语态上都没有进步。当两组结合在一起时,在特定连词(d=1.3)和 TROG-2 原始(d=1.1)和标准分数(d=0.9)上都发现了显著的进步。相关性分析表明,没有任何测量指标(包括矩阵推理测试和视觉感知技能测试)与目标连词或 TROG-2 的进步有显著相关性。
4 小时的形状编码治疗显著提高了对并列连词的理解能力,并且在 4 个月后仍能保持。鉴于在组间水平上取得了显著的进步,且缺乏可靠的进步预测因素,这种方法可以提供给具有与参与者类似困难的其他儿童。然而,这种干预是由言语和语言治疗师一对一进行的,因此这种治疗方法与其他治疗方法的有效性仍有待评估。