Suppr超能文献

使用Perclose Proglide完全经皮入路进行主动脉疾病的血管内治疗。

Totally Percutaneous Access Using Perclose Proglide for Endovascular Treatment of Aortic Diseases.

作者信息

Saadi Eduardo Keller, Saadi Marina, Saadi Rodrigo, Tagliari Ana Paula, Mastella Bernardo

机构信息

Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

Universidade Luterana do Brasil (ULBRA), Canoas, RS, Brazil.

出版信息

Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Jan-Feb;32(1):43-48. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2016-0065.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate our experience following the introduction of a percutaneous program for endovascular treatment of aortic diseases using Perclose Proglide® assessing efficacy, complications and identification of potential risk factors that could predict failure or major access site complications.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study during a two-year period was performed. All the patients submitted to totally percutaneous endovascular repair (PEVAR) of aortic diseases and transcatheter aortic valve implantation since we started the total percutaneous approach with the preclosure technique from November 2013 to December 2015 were included in the study. The primary endpoint was major ipsilateral access complication, defined according to PEVAR trial.

RESULTS

In a cohort of 123 patients, immediate technical success was obtained in 121 (98.37%) patients, with only two (0.82%) cases in 242 vascular access sites that required intervention immediately after the procedure. Pairwise comparisons revealed increased major access complication among patients with >50% common femoral artery (CFA) calcification vs. none (P=0.004) and > 50% CFA calcification vs. < 50% CFA calcification (P=0.002). Small artery diameter (<6.5 mm) also increased major access complication compared to bigger diameters (> 6.5 mm) (P=0.027).

CONCLUSION

The preclosure technique with two Perclose Proglide® for PEVAR is safe and effective. Complications occur more often in patients with unfavorable access site anatomy and the success rate can be improved with proper patient selection.

摘要

目的

采用Perclose Proglide®评估经皮血管腔内治疗主动脉疾病方案的疗效、并发症,并识别可能预测失败或主要穿刺部位并发症的潜在风险因素,从而评估我们的经验。

方法

进行了一项为期两年的回顾性队列研究。自2013年11月至2015年12月我们开始采用预闭合技术的完全经皮方法以来,所有接受主动脉疾病完全经皮血管腔内修复术(PEVAR)和经导管主动脉瓣植入术的患者均纳入研究。主要终点是主要同侧穿刺并发症,根据PEVAR试验定义。

结果

在123例患者队列中,121例(98.37%)患者即刻获得技术成功,在242个血管穿刺部位中只有2例(0.82%)在术后需要立即干预。两两比较显示,股总动脉(CFA)钙化>50%的患者与无钙化患者相比主要穿刺并发症增加(P = 0.004),CFA钙化>50%的患者与CFA钙化<50%的患者相比主要穿刺并发症增加(P = 0.002)。与较大动脉直径(>6.5 mm)相比,小动脉直径(<6.5 mm)也增加了主要穿刺并发症(P = 0.027)。

结论

用于PEVAR的双Perclose Proglide®预闭合技术安全有效。在穿刺部位解剖结构不利的患者中并发症更常发生,通过适当的患者选择可以提高成功率。

相似文献

1
Totally Percutaneous Access Using Perclose Proglide for Endovascular Treatment of Aortic Diseases.
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Jan-Feb;32(1):43-48. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2016-0065.
4
Total percutaneous access for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair ("Preclose" technique).
J Vasc Surg. 2007 Jun;45(6):1095-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.01.050. Epub 2007 Mar 29.
5
Safety and utility of total percutaneous endovascular aortic repair with a single Perclose ProGlide closure device.
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Mar;63(3):585-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.08.111. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
8
Single-Center Experience Following the Introduction of a Percutaneous Endovascular Aneurysm Repair First Approach.
Angiology. 2017 Feb;68(2):119-123. doi: 10.1177/0003319716646681. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
9
Predicting the learning curve and failures of total percutaneous endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Jan;57(1):72-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.07.050. Epub 2012 Nov 3.
10
Predictors and treatments of Proglide-related complications in percutaneous endovascular aortic repair.
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 22;10(4):e0123739. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123739. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety and effectiveness of single ProStyle™/ProGlide™ for aortic endovascular procedures: single-style study.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Jul 3;12:1559131. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1559131. eCollection 2025.
2
Large-Bore Transfemoral Arterial Access: Techniques and Troubleshooting.
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2024 Dec 18;41(6):560-565. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1800957. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Optimizing Femoral Access in Emergency EVAR with a Decision-Making Algorithm.
Life (Basel). 2024 Sep 4;14(9):1113. doi: 10.3390/life14091113.
4
Learning Curve of Perclose ProGlide Utilization During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Cureus. 2023 Apr 26;15(4):e38155. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38155. eCollection 2023 Apr.
6
Preclosure technique versus arterial cutdown after percutaneous cannulation for venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
JTCVS Tech. 2021 Aug 26;10:322-330. doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2021.08.030. eCollection 2021 Dec.
8
Safety and efficacy of the percutaneous thoracic endovascular repair with regional anesthesia.
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Feb;69(2):267-273. doi: 10.1007/s11748-020-01452-w. Epub 2020 Jul 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Safety and utility of total percutaneous endovascular aortic repair with a single Perclose ProGlide closure device.
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Mar;63(3):585-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.08.111. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
2
Percutaneous versus femoral cutdown access for endovascular aneurysm repair.
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Jul;62(1):16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.01.058. Epub 2015 Mar 28.
3
Percutaneous thoracic endovascular aortic repair is not contraindicated in obese patients.
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Oct;60(4):921-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.04.051. Epub 2014 May 17.
4
A single-centre experience of 200 consecutive unselected patients in percutaneous EVAR.
Radiol Med. 2014 Nov;119(11):835-41. doi: 10.1007/s11547-014-0399-7. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
6
Current update on the status of totally percutaneous aneurysm repair.
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2013 Aug;47(6):409-14. doi: 10.1177/1538574413493677.
8
10
Vascular closure device failure: we are getting better but not there yet.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Aug;5(8):845-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.06.006.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验