Suppr超能文献

解剖学学习体验问卷的心理计量学评估及其与学习成果的相关性。

A psychometric evaluation of the anatomy learning experiences questionnaire and correlations with learning outcomes.

机构信息

Division of Medicine, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.

Division of Paramedicine, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.

出版信息

Anat Sci Educ. 2017 Nov;10(6):514-527. doi: 10.1002/ase.1693. Epub 2017 Apr 17.

Abstract

The Anatomy Learning Experiences Questionnaire (ALEQ) was designed by Smith and Mathias to explore students' perceptions and experiences of learning anatomy. In this study, the psychometric properties of a slightly altered 34-item ALEQ (ALEQ-34) were evaluated, and correlations with learning outcomes investigated, by surveying first- and second-year undergraduate medical students; 181 usable responses were obtained (75% response rate). Psychometric analysis demonstrated overall good reliability (Cronbach's alpha of 0.85). Exploratory factor analysis yielded a 27-item, three-factor solution (ALEQ-27, Cronbach's alpha of 0.86), described as: (Factor 1) (Reversed) challenges in learning anatomy, (Factor 2) Applications and importance of anatomy, and (Factor 3) Learning in the dissection laboratory. Second-year students had somewhat greater challenges and less positive attitudes in learning anatomy than first-year students. Females reported slightly greater challenges and less confidence in learning anatomy than males. Total scores on summative gross anatomy examination questions correlated with ALEQ-27, Pearson's r = 0.222 and 0.271, in years 1 and 2, respectively, and with Factor 1, r = 0.479 and 0.317 (all statistically significant). Factor 1 also had similar correlations across different question types (multiple choice; short answer or essay; cadaveric; and anatomical models, bones, or radiological images). In a retrospective analysis, Factor 1 predicted poor end-of-semester anatomy examination results in year 1 with a sensitivity of 88% and positive predictive value of 33%. Further development of ALEQ-27 may enable deeper understanding of students' learning of anatomy, and its ten-item Factor 1 may be a useful screening tool to identify at-risk students. Anat Sci Educ 10: 514-527. © 2017 American Association of Anatomists.

摘要

《解剖学学习体验问卷》(ALEQ)是由 Smith 和 Mathias 设计的,旨在探索学生对解剖学学习的看法和体验。在这项研究中,通过调查一年级和二年级本科医学生,评估了略微修改后的 34 项 ALEQ(ALEQ-34)的心理测量特性,并研究了与学习成果的相关性;获得了 181 份可用的回复(75%的回复率)。心理测量分析表明,整体信度良好(Cronbach 的 α 为 0.85)。探索性因素分析得出了 27 项 3 因素解决方案(ALEQ-27,Cronbach 的 α 为 0.86),描述为:(因素 1)学习解剖学的挑战(反向),(因素 2)解剖学的应用和重要性,(因素 3)解剖实验室的学习。与一年级学生相比,二年级学生在学习解剖学时面临更大的挑战和更消极的态度。与男性相比,女性报告在学习解剖学时面临更大的挑战和缺乏信心。综合形态学考试问题的总得分与 ALEQ-27 相关,Pearson r 在第 1 年和第 2 年分别为 0.222 和 0.271,与因素 1 相关,r 分别为 0.479 和 0.317(均具有统计学意义)。因素 1 在不同类型的问题(多项选择、简答题或短文题、尸体解剖、解剖模型、骨骼或放射图像)中也具有相似的相关性。在回顾性分析中,因素 1 预测第 1 年学期末解剖学考试成绩不佳,敏感性为 88%,阳性预测值为 33%。ALEQ-27 的进一步发展可能使我们更深入地了解学生的解剖学学习情况,其 10 项因素 1 可能是识别有风险学生的有用筛查工具。Anat Sci Educ 10:514-527. © 2017 美国解剖学家协会。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验