Suppr超能文献

基于癌基因成瘾、合成致死和表观遗传拮抗作用,针对选定的实体瘤中的染色质缺陷。

Targeting chromatin defects in selected solid tumors based on oncogene addiction, synthetic lethality and epigenetic antagonism.

机构信息

INSERM, UMR981, Villejuif, France.

Institut Curie, Centre de Recherche, Paris, France.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 2017 Feb 1;28(2):254-269. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw552.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although the role of epigenetic abnormalities has been studied for several years in cancer genesis and development, epigenetic-targeting drugs have historically failed to demonstrate efficacy in solid malignancies. However, successful targeting of chromatin remodeling deficiencies, histone writers and histone reader alterations has been achieved very recently using biomarker-driven and mechanism-based approaches. Epigenetic targeting is now one of the most active areas in drug development and could represent novel therapeutic opportunity for up to 25% of all solid tumors.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We reviewed preclinical and clinical studies that described epigenetic oncogenic addictions, synthetic lethal relationships or epigenetic antagonisms in chromatin regulators. Experimental approaches, their clinical relevance and applicability, as well as corresponding on-going studies are described.

RESULTS

The most successful approaches that have been clinically validated so far include the targeting of the BRD4-NUT fusion transcript in NUT-midline carcinoma by BET (Bromodomain Extra-Terminal) inhibitors, and the use of EZH2 (Enhancer of Zest Homolog 2) inhibitors in SMARCB1-deficient malignant rhabdoid tumors and SMARCA4-deficient ovarian small cell carcinomas. Clinical validation is still required for other synthetic lethal relationships or epigenetic antagonisms, including those described between EZH2 inhibitors and deficiencies in components of the Polycomb or SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling complexes (including BAP1, ARID1A and PBRM1 subunits), as well as between the CREBBP and EP300 histone acetylases. Further, interplays between epigenetic modifiers and non-epigenetic cellular processes might be therapeutically exploited, and combinatorial strategies could be envisioned to overcome resistance or to sensitize cells to already approved drugs.

CONCLUSION

Epigenetic-targeting drugs have historically failed proving efficacy in solid malignancies when used broadly, but novel mechanism-based approaches in molecularly selected patient populations have facilitated recent successes in proof-of-concept studies in solid tumors. Appropriate clinical trial design and molecular patient selection will be key for the success of epigenetic modifiers in solid tumours.

摘要

背景

尽管表观遗传异常在癌症的发生和发展中已经研究了多年,但在实体恶性肿瘤中,表观遗传靶向药物的疗效一直未能得到证实。然而,最近通过基于生物标志物和机制的方法,成功地靶向了染色质重塑缺陷、组蛋白书写器和组蛋白读取器的改变。表观遗传靶向现在是药物开发中最活跃的领域之一,对于多达 25%的所有实体肿瘤都可能代表新的治疗机会。

材料和方法

我们回顾了描述染色质调节剂中表观遗传致癌成瘾、合成致死关系或表观遗传拮抗作用的临床前和临床研究。描述了实验方法、它们的临床相关性和适用性,以及正在进行的相应研究。

结果

迄今为止,在临床上得到验证的最成功的方法包括通过 BET(溴结构域额外末端)抑制剂靶向 NUT 中线癌中的 BRD4-NUT 融合转录本,以及在 SMARCB1 缺陷性恶性横纹肌样肿瘤和 SMARCA4 缺陷性卵巢小细胞癌中使用 EZH2(增强子的 Zest 同源物 2)抑制剂。其他合成致死关系或表观遗传拮抗作用仍需要临床验证,包括描述的 EZH2 抑制剂与 Polycomb 或 SWI/SNF 染色质重塑复合物(包括 BAP1、ARID1A 和 PBRM1 亚基)成分缺陷之间,以及 CREBBP 和 EP300 组蛋白乙酰转移酶之间的关系。此外,表观遗传修饰剂与非表观遗传细胞过程之间的相互作用可能具有治疗潜力,并且可以设想组合策略来克服耐药性或使细胞对已批准的药物敏感。

结论

当广泛使用时,表观遗传靶向药物在实体恶性肿瘤中一直未能证明疗效,但在分子选择的患者群体中采用新的基于机制的方法,促进了在实体肿瘤中概念验证研究的最近成功。适当的临床试验设计和分子患者选择将是实体肿瘤中表观遗传修饰剂成功的关键。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验