Tahraoui L, Floch A, Mondot S, Cavero I
Rhone-Poulenc Sante, Centre de Recherche de Vitry, Vitry-sur-Seine, France.
Mol Pharmacol. 1988 Aug;34(2):145-51.
In canine platelet membranes, tritiated platelet activating factor (PAF) labels in a saturable and reversible manner a single population (nH = 0.97) of binding sites. The affinity of this binding was high (Kd = 0.23 +/- 0.02 nM, n = 4, and 0.21 +/- 0.05, n = 8, determined by kinetics or saturation experiments, respectively), and the density of binding sites (Bmax) was 911 +/- 31 fmol/mg of protein (n = 8). [3H]PAF binding was entirely reversed by unlabeled PAF (10 microM). [3H]PAF exhibited stereoselective discrimination inasmuch as it was poorly displaced by enantio-PAF, the PAF enantiomer that does not occur naturally. Furthermore, the displacing potency of the (+)-enantiomer of the PAF antagonist 52770 RP against [3H]PAF was 45 times higher than that of the (-)-enantiomer. [3H]PAF binding displayed a remarkable specificity in that it was not affected by a variety of classical pharmacological agents. However, this binding was displaced by several PAF receptor antagonists such as 59227 RP, CV-6209, Ro 19-3704, 52770 RP, brotizolam, WEB 2086, SRI 63-441, L-652,731, alprazolam, triazolam, and BN 52021. The Ki of the 16 studied antagonists ranged from 7.9 nM (59227 RP, most potent) to 16.8 microM (BN 52021, least potent). The possible biological significance of our binding procedure was assessed by correlating the potencies of 16 PAF antagonists as [3H]PAF displacers in dog platelet membranes and as inhibitors of PAF-induced platelet aggregation in washed canine platelets. This analysis revealed the existence of a highly significant correlation (r = 0.82, p less than 0.001) between biochemical and functional tests. However, two compounds (Ro 19-3704 and BN 52021) were found to be located outside the confidence limits when the probability level of belonging to the regression line was set at 0.01. In conclusion, this study provides evidence that [3H]PAF binding in canine platelet membranes exhibits the required properties for a valid binding procedure. Furthermore, the labeled sites are likely to be the counterparts of platelet receptors that, when activated by PAF, induce aggregation.
在犬类血小板膜中,氚标记的血小板活化因子(PAF)以可饱和且可逆的方式标记单一群体(nH = 0.97)的结合位点。这种结合的亲和力很高(通过动力学或饱和实验测定,Kd分别为0.23±0.02 nM,n = 4;以及0.21±0.05,n = 8),结合位点密度(Bmax)为911±31 fmol/mg蛋白质(n = 8)。未标记的PAF(10 μM)可完全逆转[3H]PAF的结合。[3H]PAF表现出立体选择性区分,因为它很难被对映体PAF(天然不存在的PAF对映体)取代。此外,PAF拮抗剂52770 RP的(+)-对映体对[3H]PAF的取代效力比对映体(-)高45倍。[3H]PAF结合具有显著的特异性,因为它不受多种经典药理剂的影响。然而,这种结合可被几种PAF受体拮抗剂取代,如59227 RP、CV-6209、Ro 19-3704、52770 RP、溴替唑仑、WEB 2086、SRI 63-441、L-652,731、阿普唑仑、三唑仑和BN 52021。所研究的16种拮抗剂的Ki范围从7.9 nM(59227 RP,效力最强)到16.8 μM(BN 52021,效力最弱)。通过将16种PAF拮抗剂作为犬血小板膜中[3H]PAF取代剂的效力与作为洗涤犬血小板中PAF诱导的血小板聚集抑制剂的效力进行关联,评估了我们结合程序可能的生物学意义。该分析揭示了生化和功能测试之间存在高度显著的相关性(r = 0.82,p < 0.001)。然而,当属于回归线的概率水平设定为0.01时,发现两种化合物(Ro 19-3704和BN 52021)位于置信限之外。总之,本研究提供了证据表明犬血小板膜中的[3H]PAF结合表现出有效结合程序所需的特性。此外,标记位点可能是血小板受体的对应物,当被PAF激活时会诱导聚集。