Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Republic of Korea; Laboratory of Emergency Medical Services, Seoul National University Hospital Biomedical Research Institute, Republic of Korea.
Laboratory of Emergency Medical Services, Seoul National University Hospital Biomedical Research Institute, Republic of Korea.
Resuscitation. 2017 Jun;115:148-154. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.04.020. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
Timely post-resuscitation coronary reperfusion therapy is recommended; however, the timing of immediate coronary reperfusion for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) has not been established. We studied the effect of the time interval from arrest to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on resuscitated OHCA patients.
All witnessed OHCA patients with a presumed cardiac etiology received successful PCI at hospitals between 2013 and 2015, excluding cases with unknown information regarding the time from arrest to PCI and survival outcomes. The main exposure of interest was the time interval from arrest to ballooning or stent placement in coronary arteries, and cases were categorized into five groups of 0-90, 90-120, 120-150, and 150-180min and 3-6h. The endpoint was survival with good neurological recovery. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed, adjusting for patient-community, prehospital, and hospital factors.
A total of 765 patients (24.1% received PCI within 90min; 31.0% in 90-120min; 17.8% in 120-150min; 12.3% in 150-180min; 14.9% in 3-6h after arrest) were included. Good neurological recovery was more frequent in the early PCI groups than the delayed PCI group (63.6%, 55.3%, 47.8%, 33.0%, and 42.1%, respectively). The adjusted OR (95% CI) for good neurological recovery compared with the most early PCI group was 0.86 (0.53-1.39) in the PCI group between 90 and 120min; 0.76 (0.45-1.31) in the PCI group between 120 and 150min; 0.42 (0.22-0.79) in the PCI group between 150 and 180min; and 0.53 (0.30-0.93) in PCI group after 3h.
Among resuscitated OHCA patients with a presumed cardiac etiology and successful PCI, patients who received a delayed coronary intervention after 150min from arrest were less likely to have neurologically intact survival compared to those who received an early intervention.
推荐及时进行心肺复苏后冠状动脉再灌注治疗;然而,院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者即刻冠状动脉再灌注的时机尚未确定。我们研究了从心脏骤停到经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的时间间隔对复苏 OHCA 患者的影响。
2013 年至 2015 年间,所有在医院接受成功 PCI 的有明确心脏病因的目击 OHCA 患者均被纳入研究,排除了信息不详或存活结局不详的病例。主要暴露因素为从心脏骤停到球囊扩张或支架置入的时间间隔,病例分为 5 组:0-90min、90-120min、120-150min、150-180min 和 3-6h。终点是存活且神经功能恢复良好。进行了多变量逻辑回归分析,调整了患者-社区、院外和医院因素。
共纳入 765 例患者(24.1%在 90min 内接受 PCI;31.0%在 90-120min 内;17.8%在 120-150min 内;12.3%在 150-180min 内;14.9%在心脏骤停后 3-6h 内接受 PCI)。早期 PCI 组的神经功能良好恢复率高于延迟 PCI 组(分别为 63.6%、55.3%、47.8%、33.0%和 42.1%)。与最早的 PCI 组相比,90-120min 内 PCI 组、120-150min 内 PCI 组、150-180min 内 PCI 组和 3h 后 PCI 组的良好神经功能恢复的调整后的 OR(95%CI)分别为 0.86(0.53-1.39)、0.76(0.45-1.31)、0.42(0.22-0.79)和 0.53(0.30-0.93)。
在复苏 OHCA 患者中,对于有明确心脏病因且成功接受 PCI 的患者,与早期干预相比,心脏骤停后 150min 后接受延迟冠状动脉介入治疗的患者神经功能完整的存活可能性较小。