Measurable Supratentorial White Matter Volume Changes in Patients with Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma Treated with an Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Agent, Steroids, and Radiation.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Assessing the response to treatment in infiltrative brain tumors by using lesion volume-based response criteria is challenging. We hypothesized that in such tumors, volume measurements alone may not accurately capture changes in actual tumor burden during treatment. We longitudinally evaluated volume changes in both normal-appearing supratentorial white matter and the brain stem lesions in patients treated for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma to determine to what extent adjuvant systemic therapies may skew the accuracy of tumor response assessments based on volumetric analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The anatomic MR imaging and diffusion tensor imaging data of 26 patients with diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma were retrospectively analyzed. Treatment included conformal radiation therapy in conjunction with vandetanib and dexamethasone. Volumetric and diffusion data were analyzed with time, and differences between time points were evaluated statistically.

RESULTS

Normalized brain stem lesion volume decreased during combined treatment (slope = -0.222, < .001) and increased shortly after completion of radiation therapy (slope = 0.422, < .001). Supratentorial white matter volume steadily and significantly decreased with time (slope = -0.057, < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Longitudinal changes in brain stem lesion volume are robust; less pronounced but measurable changes occur in the supratentorial white matter. Volume changes in nonirradiated supratentorial white matter during the disease course reflect the effects of systemic medication on the water homeostasis of normal parenchyma. Our data suggest that adjuvant nontumor-targeted therapies may have a more substantial effect on lesion volume changes than previously thought; hence, an apparent volume decrease in infiltrative tumors receiving combined therapies may lead to overestimation of the actual response and tumor control.