Suppr超能文献

血管生成抑制剂再次挑战在先前接受贝伐单抗治疗的结直肠癌中的作用:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

The role of angiogenesis inhibitors re-challenge in colorectal cancer previously treated with bevacizumab: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Xiong Y-X, Ren L, Wang Z-Q, Huang X-W, Zhou Y-J

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, South-West Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan Province, China.

出版信息

Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2017 Apr;21(7):1489-1494.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The potential usefulness of angiogenesis inhibitors (AIs) re-challenge in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) who previously treated with bevacizumab has not been established yet.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified relevant clinical studies through searching databases up to October 2016. Prospective clinical trials investigating AIs re-challenge in metastatic CRC were included for analysis. The primary endpoint was overall survival with secondary endpoint progression-free survival. Estimates of treatment effect from individual trials were combined using standard techniques.

RESULTS

A total of 2.686 patients with metastatic CRC who previously received bevacizumab were identified for analysis. The meta-analysis results demonstrated that AI re-challenge significantly improved progression-free survival (hazard ratio: 0.63, 95% confidence interval: 0.52-0.76, p < 0.001) and overall survival (hazard ratio: 0.82, 95% confidence interval: 0.76-0.89, p < 0.001) when compared to non-AI containing regimens. No publication bias was detected by Begg's and Egger's tests for PFS (p = 0.09 and p = 0.32) and OS (p = 0.85 and p = 0.50).

CONCLUSIONS

Our pooled analysis shows that AIs re-challenge offers an improved PFS and OS in the treatment of metastatic CRC patients who relapsed after a first-line bevacizumab-containing therapy. Further prospective clinical trials are still needed to confirm our findings.

摘要

目的

血管生成抑制剂(AIs)再次挑战疗法在先前接受过贝伐单抗治疗的转移性结直肠癌(CRC)治疗中的潜在效用尚未确定。

材料与方法

通过检索截至2016年10月的数据库,我们确定了相关临床研究。纳入分析的是调查AIs再次挑战疗法在转移性CRC中的前瞻性临床试验。主要终点是总生存期,次要终点是无进展生存期。使用标准技术合并各个试验的治疗效果估计值。

结果

共确定了2686例先前接受过贝伐单抗治疗的转移性CRC患者进行分析。荟萃分析结果表明,与不含AIs的治疗方案相比,AIs再次挑战疗法显著改善了无进展生存期(风险比:0.63,95%置信区间:0.52 - 0.76,p < 0.001)和总生存期(风险比:0.82,95%置信区间:0.76 - 0.89,p < 0.001)。Begg检验和Egger检验未检测到无进展生存期(p = 0.09和p = 0.32)及总生存期(p = 0.85和p = 0.50)存在发表偏倚。

结论

我们的汇总分析表明,AIs再次挑战疗法在治疗一线含贝伐单抗治疗后复发的转移性CRC患者时可改善无进展生存期和总生存期。仍需进一步的前瞻性临床试验来证实我们的发现。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验