Andrews Samantha J, Ahern Elizabeth C, Lamb Michael E
Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K.
Behav Sci Law. 2017 May;35(3):204-224. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2286. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
This study examined the uncertain responses of 56 alleged sexual abuse victims, aged 5-17 years, testifying in Scottish criminal court trials. Don't know/remember ground rules were explained to 38% of the children and each child reported uncertainty in response to 15% of the questions on average. Uncertain responding was associated with expressions of resistance and confusion, questioning context (proportionally more regarding substantive than non-substantive issues), question content (least to disclosure-focused questions), utterance type (more to directives, particularly those posed by defense lawyers; more to recall-based than recognition prompts), and age (children in mid-adolescence were less likely to respond uncertainly than those who were either older or younger). There were no associations between expressions of uncertainty and ground rule administration, or with whether or not the question focused on central rather than peripheral details about the alleged crimes. Findings highlight concerns surrounding preparatory procedures to help witnesses, especially adolescents, indicate uncertainty when testifying. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
本研究调查了56名年龄在5至17岁之间、在苏格兰刑事法庭审判中作证的性虐待指控受害者的不确定反应。38%的儿童被告知“不知道/记不清”的基本规则,每个儿童平均对15%的问题回答不确定。不确定回答与抗拒和困惑的表达、提问背景(实质性问题的比例高于非实质性问题)、问题内容(对聚焦披露的问题最少)、话语类型(对指令性问题更多,尤其是辩护律师提出的指令性问题;对基于回忆的提示比对识别提示更多)以及年龄(青春期中期的儿童比年龄较大或较小的儿童更不太可能不确定地回答)有关。不确定表达与基本规则管理之间没有关联,也与问题是否聚焦于指控罪行的核心细节而非外围细节无关。研究结果凸显了围绕帮助证人(尤其是青少年)在作证时表明不确定的准备程序的担忧。版权所有© 2017约翰·威利父子有限公司。