• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

循证政策即反思性实践。我们能从循证医学中学到什么?

Evidence-based policy as reflexive practice. What can we learn from evidence-based medicine?

作者信息

Bal Roland

机构信息

Professor of Healthcare Governance, Erasmus Medical Centre - Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Health Serv Res Policy. 2017 Apr;22(2):113-119. doi: 10.1177/1355819616670680. Epub 2016 Oct 15.

DOI:10.1177/1355819616670680
PMID:28429971
Abstract

The call for evidence-based policy is often accompanied by rather uncritical references to the success of evidence-based medicine, leading to often unsuccessful translation attempts. In this paper, I reflect on the practice of evidence-based medicine in an attempt to sketch a more productive approach to translating evidence into the practice of policy making. Discussing three episodes in the history of evidence-based medicine - clinical trials, and the production and use of clinical guidelines - I conclude that the success of evidence-based medicine is based on the creation of reflexive practices in which evidence and practice can be combined productively. In the conclusion, I discuss the prospects of such a practice for evidence-based policy.

摘要

对循证政策的呼吁往往伴随着对循证医学成功的不加批判的提及,导致翻译尝试往往不成功。在本文中,我反思循证医学的实践,试图勾勒出一种更有效的方法,将证据转化为政策制定实践。通过讨论循证医学历史上的三个事件——临床试验以及临床指南的制定和使用——我得出结论,循证医学的成功基于创建反思性实践,在这种实践中,证据和实践能够有效地结合。在结论部分,我讨论了这种实践对于循证政策的前景。

相似文献

1
Evidence-based policy as reflexive practice. What can we learn from evidence-based medicine?循证政策即反思性实践。我们能从循证医学中学到什么?
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2017 Apr;22(2):113-119. doi: 10.1177/1355819616670680. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
2
A philosophical argument against evidence-based policy.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Oct;23(5):1045-1050. doi: 10.1111/jep.12578. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
3
Evidence-based recommendations for spine surgery.脊柱手术的循证医学推荐意见。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Mar 1;40(5):E309-16. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000763.
4
Evidence-based recommendations for spine surgery.脊柱手术的循证医学推荐意见。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jan 1;38(1):E30-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318275cdd8.
5
[Development of the evidence-based guidelines for psoriasis--a project of the German Dermatological Society (DDG)].[银屑病循证指南的制定——德国皮肤病学会(DDG)的一个项目]
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2005 Sep;3(9):678-89. doi: 10.1111/j.1610-0387.2005.05062.x.
6
Synthesis, grading, and presentation of evidence in guidelines: article 7 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.指南中证据的综合、分级和呈现:COPD 指南制定中整合和协调工作的第 7 条。美国胸科学会/欧洲呼吸学会工作组报告。
Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2012 Dec;9(5):256-61. doi: 10.1513/pats.201208-060ST.
7
Translating tuberculosis research into global policies: the example of an international collaboration on diagnostics.将结核病研究转化为全球政策:以诊断国际合作为例。
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2011 Oct;15(10):1283-93. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.11.0297.
8
Translating evidence into policy in China: opportunities and challenges.将证据转化为政策在中国:机遇与挑战。
Front Med. 2011 Sep;5(3):315-20. doi: 10.1007/s11684-011-0146-6. Epub 2011 Oct 2.
9
Quality and strength: the GRADE system for formulating recommendations in clinical practice guidelines.质量与强度:临床实践指南中制定推荐意见的GRADE系统
Arch Bronconeumol. 2013 Jun;49(6):261-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arbres.2012.12.001. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
10
Procedural pain in children: evidence-based best practice and guidelines.儿童程序性疼痛:循证最佳实践与指南
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2003 Nov-Dec;28(6):561-72. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2003.08.023.

引用本文的文献

1
Cohort profile: the PERSIAN Dena Cohort Study (PDCS) of non-communicable diseases in Southwest Iran.队列研究简介:伊朗西南部非传染性疾病的 PERSIAN Dena 队列研究(PDCS)。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 10;14(4):e079697. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079697.
2
Envisioning and shaping translation of knowledge into action: A comparative case-study of stakeholder engagement in the development of a European tobacco control tool.设想并推动知识转化为行动:欧洲烟草控制工具开发中利益相关者参与的比较案例研究
Health Policy. 2019 Oct;123(10):917-923. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.07.012. Epub 2019 Jul 20.
3
Exploring How Evidence is Used in Care Through an Organizational Ethnography of Two Teaching Hospitals.
通过对两家教学医院的组织人种学研究探索证据在医疗护理中的应用方式。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 28;21(3):e10769. doi: 10.2196/10769.
4
The protocol of a population-based prospective cohort study in southwest of Iran to analyze common non-communicable diseases: Shahrekord cohort study.伊朗西南部一项基于人群的前瞻性队列研究方案,旨在分析常见的非传染性疾病:设拉子队列研究。
BMC Public Health. 2018 May 25;18(1):660. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5364-2.
5
Improving health promotion through central rating of interventions: the need for Responsive Guidance.通过中央干预措施评级提高健康促进效果:响应式指导的必要性。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Nov 23;15(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0258-9.