Mundipharma Research Limited, Cambridge, UK.
National Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Addiction. 2017 Sep;112(9):1647-1652. doi: 10.1111/add.13849. Epub 2017 May 28.
Lack of non-injectable naloxone formulations has impeded widespread take-home provision for the prevention of heroin/opioid overdose deaths. For non-injectable formulations that are finally being investigated, rapid onset of action and sufficient bioavailability will be vital. We present analysis of data from a study of concentrated naloxone nasal spray formulations. Our aims are: to assess (1) pharmacokinetic properties and (2) suitability for overdose reversal in terms of naloxone absorption within 30 minutes post-dosing.
DESIGN AND INTERVENTIONS/COMPARATOR: Open-label, randomized, four-way cross-over Latin-square pharmacokinetic study of naloxone administration by three routes: intranasal at two doses (8 mg/0.4 ml, 16 mg/0.4 ml) versus sublingual (16 mg/ml) versus intravenous reference (1 mg/ml).
Clinical Pharmacology Unit at The Ohio State University (Columbus, OH, USA).
Twelve healthy volunteers (age 20-41; seven female).
From blood plasma naloxone concentrations, (1) standard pharmacokinetic parameters, including maximum plasma concentration (C ) and mean absolute bioavailability (F%, relative to intravenous injection), were determined; as well as (2) partial area under the curve (AUC) values, t (time to maximum plasma concentration) and t (time to 50% of maximum plasma concentration) as measures of early absorption.
(1) Bioavailability was F% = 25-28% for intranasal naloxone. Sublingual had low bioavailability (F% = 2%) and was not considered further. Mean C values for 8 mg (12.83 ng/ml) and 16 mg (18.25 ng/ml) intranasal exceeded 1 mg intravenous (9.64 ng/ml) naloxone. (2) Following intranasal administration, t was reached within 8 minutes and t within 20 minutes. Mean naloxone absorption from dosing to 30 minutes (AUC ) was greater following 8 mg (4.17 h × ng/ml) and 16 mg (5.91 h × ng/ml) intranasal than following 1 mg intravenous (1.70 h × ng/ml) administration.
Concentrated naloxone nasal spray has a promising pharmacokinetic profile, with substantial bioavailability. Its early absorption time-course suggests that concentrated nasal naloxone is suitable for emergency administration in the community, where rapid restoration of respiratory function is essential for opioid overdose reversal.
缺乏非注射用纳洛酮制剂阻碍了海洛因/阿片类药物过量致死的广泛家庭提供。对于最终正在研究的非注射制剂,快速起效和足够的生物利用度将是至关重要的。我们介绍了浓缩纳洛酮鼻喷雾剂制剂研究中数据的分析。我们的目的是:(1)评估药代动力学特性和(2)在 30 分钟内给药后纳洛酮吸收的情况下,评估在 30 分钟内给药后纳洛酮吸收的情况下的适宜性。
设计和干预措施/比较:纳洛酮通过三种途径给药的开放标签、随机、四向交叉拉丁方药代动力学研究:鼻内两种剂量(8mg/0.4ml,16mg/0.4ml)与舌下(16mg/ml)与静脉参考(1mg/ml)。
俄亥俄州立大学临床药理学单位(哥伦布,俄亥俄州,美国)。
12 名健康志愿者(年龄 20-41;7 名女性)。
从血浆纳洛酮浓度,(1)标准药代动力学参数,包括最大血浆浓度(C)和平均绝对生物利用度(F%,相对于静脉注射)确定;以及(2)部分曲线下面积(AUC)值、t(达到最大血浆浓度的时间)和 t(达到最大血浆浓度的 50%的时间),作为早期吸收的测量。
(1)鼻内纳洛酮的生物利用度为 F%=25-28%。舌下吸收生物利用度低(F%=2%),因此不再考虑。8mg(12.83ng/ml)和 16mg(18.25ng/ml)鼻内的平均 C 值超过 1mg 静脉(9.64ng/ml)纳洛酮。(2)鼻内给药后,t 达到 8 分钟,t 达到 20 分钟。从剂量到 30 分钟的平均纳洛酮吸收(AUC)在 8mg(4.17h×ng/ml)和 16mg(5.91h×ng/ml)鼻内给药后均大于 1mg 静脉(1.70h×ng/ml)给药后。
浓缩纳洛酮鼻喷雾剂具有有希望的药代动力学特征,具有很高的生物利用度。其早期吸收时间过程表明,浓缩鼻内纳洛酮适合在社区紧急给药,在社区中,恢复呼吸功能对于阿片类药物过量逆转至关重要。