Departments of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40502, USA.
Addiction. 2011 Aug;106(8):1460-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03424.x. Epub 2011 May 3.
Sublingual buprenorphine and buprenorphine/naloxone are efficacious opioid dependence pharmacotherapies, but there are reports of their diversion and misuse by the intranasal route. The study objectives were to characterize and compare their intranasal pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles.
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study.
An in-patient research unit at the University of Kentucky.
Healthy adults (n = 10) abusing, but not physically dependent on, intranasal opioids.
Six sessions (72 hours apart) tested five intranasal doses [0/0, crushed buprenorphine (2, 8 mg), crushed buprenorphine/naloxone (2/0.5, 8/2 mg)] and one intravenous dose (0.8 mg buprenorphine/0.2 mg naloxone for bioavailability assessment). Plasma samples, physiological, subject- and observer-rated measures were collected before and for up to 72 hours after drug administration.
Both formulations produced time- and dose-dependent increases on subjective and physiological mu-opioid agonist effects (e.g. 'liking', miosis). Subjects reported higher subjective ratings and street values for 8 mg compared to 8/2 mg, but these differences were not statistically significant. No significant formulation differences in peak plasma buprenorphine concentration or time-course were observed. Buprenorphine bioavailability was 38-44% and T(max) was 35-40 minutes after all intranasal doses. Naloxone bioavailability was 24% and 30% following 2/0.5 and 8/2 mg, respectively.
It is difficult to determine if observed differences in abuse potential between intranasal buprenorphine and buprenorphine/naloxone are clinically relevant at the doses tested. Greater bioavailability and faster onset of pharmacodynamic effects compared to sublingual administration suggests a motivation for intranasal misuse in non-dependent opioid abusers. However, significant naloxone absorption from intranasal buprenorphine/naloxone administration may deter the likelihood of intranasal misuse of buprenorphine/naloxone, but not buprenorphine, in opioid-dependent individuals.
舌下给予丁丙诺啡和丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮均是有效的阿片类药物依赖治疗药物,但有报道称它们会被经鼻途径转移和滥用。本研究的目的是描述和比较它们经鼻的药效学和药代动力学特征。
一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、交叉研究。
肯塔基大学的住院研究单位。
滥用但无鼻内阿片类药物躯体依赖的健康成年人(n = 10)。
6 个疗程(间隔 72 小时)测试了 5 种经鼻剂量[0/0、粉碎的丁丙诺啡(2、8 mg)、粉碎的丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮(2/0.5、8/2 mg)]和 1 种静脉内剂量(0.8 mg 丁丙诺啡/0.2 mg 纳洛酮用于生物利用度评估)。在药物给药前和给药后长达 72 小时内采集血浆样本、生理、受试者和观察者评估的测量值。
两种制剂均产生了时间和剂量依赖性的主观和生理μ-阿片激动剂效应(例如“喜欢”、瞳孔缩小)的增加。与 8/2 mg 相比,8 mg 的主观评分和街头价值更高,但这些差异无统计学意义。未观察到制剂间在血浆丁丙诺啡浓度峰值或时间过程方面存在显著差异。丁丙诺啡的生物利用度为 38-44%,T(max)在所有经鼻剂量后 35-40 分钟。分别给予 2/0.5 和 8/2 mg 后,纳洛酮的生物利用度分别为 24%和 30%。
在测试剂量下,很难确定经鼻给予丁丙诺啡和丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮之间观察到的滥用潜力差异是否具有临床意义。与舌下给予相比,经鼻给予具有更高的生物利用度和更快的药效学作用起效时间,这表明非依赖阿片类药物滥用者有经鼻滥用的动机。然而,经鼻给予丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮会显著吸收纳洛酮,这可能会阻止依赖阿片类药物的个体经鼻滥用丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮,但不会阻止经鼻滥用丁丙诺啡。