Suppr超能文献

经鼻吸食粉碎的丁丙诺啡与丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮片剂在阿片类药物滥用者中的药效学和药代动力学特征。

The pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profile of intranasal crushed buprenorphine and buprenorphine/naloxone tablets in opioid abusers.

机构信息

Departments of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40502, USA.

出版信息

Addiction. 2011 Aug;106(8):1460-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03424.x. Epub 2011 May 3.

Abstract

AIMS

Sublingual buprenorphine and buprenorphine/naloxone are efficacious opioid dependence pharmacotherapies, but there are reports of their diversion and misuse by the intranasal route. The study objectives were to characterize and compare their intranasal pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles.

DESIGN

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study.

SETTING

An in-patient research unit at the University of Kentucky.

PARTICIPANTS

Healthy adults (n = 10) abusing, but not physically dependent on, intranasal opioids.

MEASUREMENTS

Six sessions (72 hours apart) tested five intranasal doses [0/0, crushed buprenorphine (2, 8 mg), crushed buprenorphine/naloxone (2/0.5, 8/2 mg)] and one intravenous dose (0.8 mg buprenorphine/0.2 mg naloxone for bioavailability assessment). Plasma samples, physiological, subject- and observer-rated measures were collected before and for up to 72 hours after drug administration.

FINDINGS

Both formulations produced time- and dose-dependent increases on subjective and physiological mu-opioid agonist effects (e.g. 'liking', miosis). Subjects reported higher subjective ratings and street values for 8 mg compared to 8/2 mg, but these differences were not statistically significant. No significant formulation differences in peak plasma buprenorphine concentration or time-course were observed. Buprenorphine bioavailability was 38-44% and T(max) was 35-40 minutes after all intranasal doses. Naloxone bioavailability was 24% and 30% following 2/0.5 and 8/2 mg, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

It is difficult to determine if observed differences in abuse potential between intranasal buprenorphine and buprenorphine/naloxone are clinically relevant at the doses tested. Greater bioavailability and faster onset of pharmacodynamic effects compared to sublingual administration suggests a motivation for intranasal misuse in non-dependent opioid abusers. However, significant naloxone absorption from intranasal buprenorphine/naloxone administration may deter the likelihood of intranasal misuse of buprenorphine/naloxone, but not buprenorphine, in opioid-dependent individuals.

摘要

目的

舌下给予丁丙诺啡和丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮均是有效的阿片类药物依赖治疗药物,但有报道称它们会被经鼻途径转移和滥用。本研究的目的是描述和比较它们经鼻的药效学和药代动力学特征。

设计

一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、交叉研究。

地点

肯塔基大学的住院研究单位。

参与者

滥用但无鼻内阿片类药物躯体依赖的健康成年人(n = 10)。

测量

6 个疗程(间隔 72 小时)测试了 5 种经鼻剂量[0/0、粉碎的丁丙诺啡(2、8 mg)、粉碎的丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮(2/0.5、8/2 mg)]和 1 种静脉内剂量(0.8 mg 丁丙诺啡/0.2 mg 纳洛酮用于生物利用度评估)。在药物给药前和给药后长达 72 小时内采集血浆样本、生理、受试者和观察者评估的测量值。

结果

两种制剂均产生了时间和剂量依赖性的主观和生理μ-阿片激动剂效应(例如“喜欢”、瞳孔缩小)的增加。与 8/2 mg 相比,8 mg 的主观评分和街头价值更高,但这些差异无统计学意义。未观察到制剂间在血浆丁丙诺啡浓度峰值或时间过程方面存在显著差异。丁丙诺啡的生物利用度为 38-44%,T(max)在所有经鼻剂量后 35-40 分钟。分别给予 2/0.5 和 8/2 mg 后,纳洛酮的生物利用度分别为 24%和 30%。

结论

在测试剂量下,很难确定经鼻给予丁丙诺啡和丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮之间观察到的滥用潜力差异是否具有临床意义。与舌下给予相比,经鼻给予具有更高的生物利用度和更快的药效学作用起效时间,这表明非依赖阿片类药物滥用者有经鼻滥用的动机。然而,经鼻给予丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮会显著吸收纳洛酮,这可能会阻止依赖阿片类药物的个体经鼻滥用丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮,但不会阻止经鼻滥用丁丙诺啡。

相似文献

6
Pharmacokinetics of the combination tablet of buprenorphine and naloxone.丁丙诺啡与纳洛酮复方片剂的药代动力学
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2003 May 21;70(2 Suppl):S39-47. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(03)00058-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Naloxone.纳洛酮的临床药代动力学和药效学。
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2024 Apr;63(4):397-422. doi: 10.1007/s40262-024-01355-6. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
3
Buprenorphine and its formulations: a comprehensive review.丁丙诺啡及其制剂:全面综述。
Health Psychol Res. 2022 Aug 20;10(3):37517. doi: 10.52965/001c.37517. eCollection 2022.
4
Treating Chronic Pain with Buprenorphine-The Practical Guide.《丁丙诺啡治疗慢性疼痛实用指南》。
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2021 Nov 18;22(12):116. doi: 10.1007/s11864-021-00910-8.
6
Reconsidering the Usefulness of Adding Naloxone to Buprenorphine.重新审视在丁丙诺啡中添加纳洛酮的效用
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 11;11:549272. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.549272. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

2
Post-marketing surveillance of methadone and buprenorphine in the United States.美国美沙酮和丁丙诺啡的上市后监测。
Pain Med. 2010 Jul;11(7):1078-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00877.x. Epub 2010 Jun 8.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验