Threapleton Diane E, Chung Roger Y, Wong Samuel Y S, Wong Eliza, Chau Patsy, Woo Jean, Chung Vincent C H, Yeoh Eng-Kiong
The School of Public Health and Primary Care, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China SAR.
Department of Medicine & Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China SAR.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2017 Jun 1;29(3):327-334. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx041.
Inform health system improvements by summarizing components of integrated care in older populations. Identify key implementation barriers and facilitators.
A scoping review was undertaken for evidence from MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, organizational websites and internet searches. Eligible publications included reviews, reports, individual studies and policy documents published from 2005 to February 2017.
Initial eligible documents were reviews or reports concerning integrated care approaches in older/frail populations. Other documents were later sourced to identify and contextualize implementation issues.
Study findings and implementation barriers and facilitators were charted and thematically synthesized.
Thematic synthesis using 30 publications identified 8 important components for integrated care in elderly and frail populations: (i) care continuity/transitions; (ii) enabling policies/governance; (iii) shared values/goals; (iv) person-centred care; (v) multi-/inter-disciplinary services; (vi) effective communication; (vii) case management; (viii) needs assessments for care and discharge planning. Intervention outcomes and implementation issues (barriers or facilitators) tend to depend heavily on the context and programme objectives. Implementation issues in four main areas were observed: (i) Macro-level contextual factors; (ii) Miso-level system organization (funding, leadership, service structure and culture); (iii) Miso-level intervention organization (characteristics, resources and credibility) and (iv) Micro-level factors (shared values, engagement and communication).
Improving integration in care requires many components. However, local barriers and facilitators need to be considered. Changes are expected to occur slowly and are more likely to be successful where elements of integrated care are well incorporated into local settings.
通过总结老年人群综合护理的组成部分,为卫生系统的改进提供信息。确定关键的实施障碍和促进因素。
对MEDLINE、考克兰图书馆、组织网站和互联网搜索的证据进行了范围综述。符合条件的出版物包括2005年至2017年2月发表的综述、报告、个体研究和政策文件。
最初符合条件的文件是关于老年/体弱人群综合护理方法的综述或报告。后来获取了其他文件,以确定实施问题并将其置于背景中。
对研究结果以及实施障碍和促进因素进行了图表绘制和主题综合。
使用30份出版物进行的主题综合确定了老年和体弱人群综合护理的8个重要组成部分:(i)护理连续性/过渡;(ii)扶持性政策/治理;(iii)共同价值观/目标;(iv)以人为本的护理;(v)多学科/跨学科服务;(vi)有效沟通;(vii)病例管理;(viii)护理需求评估和出院计划。干预结果和实施问题(障碍或促进因素)往往在很大程度上取决于背景和项目目标。观察到四个主要领域的实施问题:(i)宏观层面的背景因素;(ii)中观层面的系统组织(资金、领导力、服务结构和文化);(iii)中观层面的干预组织(特征、资源和可信度)以及(iv)微观层面的因素(共同价值观、参与度和沟通)。
改善护理整合需要许多组成部分。然而,需要考虑当地的障碍和促进因素。预计变化将缓慢发生,并且在综合护理要素很好地融入当地环境的地方更有可能取得成功。