• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人群临终关怀及其实施的促进因素和障碍:范围综述。

Care Toward the End of Life in Older Populations and Its Implementation Facilitators and Barriers: A Scoping Review.

机构信息

School of Public Health and Primary Care, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.

School of Public Health and Primary Care, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.

出版信息

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Dec 1;18(12):1000-1009.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.04.010. Epub 2017 Jun 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2017.04.010
PMID:28623155
Abstract

PURPOSE

To inform health system improvements for care of elderly populations approaching the end of life (EOL) by identifying important elements of care and implementation barriers and facilitators.

DESIGN

A scoping review was carried out to identify key themes in EOL care. Articles were identified from MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, organizational websites, and internet searches. Eligible publications included reviews, reports, and policy documents published between 2005 and 2016. Initially, eligible documents included reviews or reports concerning effective or important models or components of EOL care in older populations, and evidence was thematically synthesized. Later, other documents were identified to contextualize implementation issues.

RESULTS

Thematic synthesis using 35 reports identified key features in EOL care: (1) enabling policies and environments; (2) care pathways and models; (3) assessment and prognostication; (4) advance care planning and advance directives; (5) palliative and hospice care; (6) integrated and multidisciplinary care; (7) effective communication; (8) staff training and experience; (9) emotional and spiritual support; (10) personalized care; and (11) resources. Barriers in implementing EOL care include fragmented services, poor communication, difficult prognostication, difficulty in accepting prognosis, and the curative focus in medical care.

CONCLUSIONS

Quality EOL care for older populations requires many core components but the local context and implementation issues may ultimately determine if these elements can be incorporated into the system to improve care. Changes at the macro-level (system/national), meso-level (organizational), and micro-level (individual) will be required to successfully implement service changes to provide holistic and person-centered EOL care for elderly populations.

摘要

目的

通过确定临终关怀的重要护理要素、实施障碍和促进因素,为改善老年人临终关怀医疗体系提供信息。

设计

开展了范围综述,以确定临终关怀的关键主题。从 MEDLINE、Cochrane 图书馆、组织网站和互联网搜索中确定了符合条件的文章。符合条件的出版物包括 2005 年至 2016 年期间发表的综述、报告和政策文件。最初,符合条件的文件包括关于老年人群体中临终关怀有效或重要模式或组成部分的综述或报告,对证据进行了主题综合分析。后来,又确定了其他文件以了解实施问题的背景。

结果

使用 35 份报告进行的主题综合分析确定了临终关怀的关键特征:(1)有利的政策和环境;(2)护理途径和模式;(3)评估和预测;(4)预先护理计划和预先指示;(5)姑息治疗和临终关怀;(6)综合和多学科护理;(7)有效沟通;(8)员工培训和经验;(9)情感和精神支持;(10)个性化护理;(11)资源。实施临终关怀的障碍包括服务分散、沟通不良、预测困难、难以接受预测结果以及医疗保健中的治疗重点。

结论

为老年人群提供高质量的临终关怀需要许多核心要素,但当地情况和实施问题最终可能决定是否可以将这些要素纳入系统,以改善护理。需要在宏观层面(系统/国家)、中观层面(组织)和微观层面(个人)进行变革,以成功实施服务变革,为老年人群提供整体和以患者为中心的临终关怀。

相似文献

1
Care Toward the End of Life in Older Populations and Its Implementation Facilitators and Barriers: A Scoping Review.老年人群临终关怀及其实施的促进因素和障碍:范围综述。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Dec 1;18(12):1000-1009.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.04.010. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
2
Integrated care for older populations and its implementation facilitators and barriers: A rapid scoping review.老年人群的综合护理及其实施的促进因素和障碍:一项快速综述。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2017 Jun 1;29(3):327-334. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx041.
3
The Compliance of End-of-Life Care Preferences Among Older Adults and Its Facilitators and Barriers: A Scoping Review.老年人临终关怀偏好的依从性及其促进因素和障碍:一项范围综述
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Nov;22(11):2273-2280.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.05.007. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
4
Advance Directive Preferences Among Terminally Ill Older Patients and Its Facilitators and Barriers in China: A Scoping Review.中国终末期老年患者的预先指示偏好及其促进因素和障碍:范围综述。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Nov;20(11):1356-1361.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.05.013. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
5
Examining the Gaps and Issues of End-of-Life Care among Older Population through the Lens of Socioecological Model-A Multi-Method Qualitative Study of Hong Kong.通过社会生态模型审视老年人口临终关怀的差距和问题:香港的一项多方法定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 14;17(14):5072. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145072.
6
A knowledge synthesis of culturally- and spiritually-sensitive end-of-life care: findings from a scoping review.对文化和精神层面敏感的临终关怀的知识综合:一项范围综述的结果
BMC Geriatr. 2016 May 18;16:107. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0282-6.
7
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
8
End-of-life care research in Hong Kong: A systematic review of peer-reviewed publications.香港临终关怀研究:同行评审出版物的系统评价
Palliat Support Care. 2015 Dec;13(6):1711-20. doi: 10.1017/S1478951515000802. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
9
Practice and Perceived Importance of Advance Care Planning and Difficulties in Providing Palliative Care in Geriatric Health Service Facilities in Japan: A Nationwide Survey.日本老年保健服务机构中预先照护计划的实践与认知重要性及提供姑息治疗的困难:一项全国性调查
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018 Mar;35(3):464-472. doi: 10.1177/1049909117723859. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
10
End-of-life care for advanced dementia patients in residential care home-a Hong Kong perspective.香港视角下的安老院舍晚期痴呆症患者临终关怀
Ann Palliat Med. 2018 Jul;7(3):359-364. doi: 10.21037/apm.2017.08.13. Epub 2017 Aug 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Evidence adaptation and tailored implementation of family bereavement support in specialised palliative care: A multi-method study.专业姑息治疗中家庭丧亲之痛支持的证据适配与定制实施:一项多方法研究
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2025 Feb 4;8:100305. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100305. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Willingness and determinants of elder care modes among elderly individuals: insights from underdeveloped regions in Western China.西部地区欠发达地区老年人养老模式的意愿及影响因素分析
J Glob Health. 2025 Jan 24;15:04031. doi: 10.7189/jogh.15.04031.
3
Mapping an evidence-based end-of-life care framework for older adults in Chinese nursing homes: protocol for a scoping review.
为中国养老院老年人绘制基于证据的临终关怀框架:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 20;14(12):e083018. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083018.
4
Consensus-building to improve implementation of NICE guidance on planning for end-of-life treatment and care: a mixed-methods study.旨在改善实施 NICE 临终治疗和护理规划指南的共识建设:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Jul 13;23(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01495-3.
5
Consideration points in the decision making in chronic respiratory diseases.慢性呼吸道疾病决策中的考量要点。
J Rural Med. 2024 Jul;19(3):158-165. doi: 10.2185/jrm.2023-044. Epub 2024 Jul 1.
6
Barriers and facilitators to implementing advance care planning in naïve contexts - where to look when plowing new terrain?在陌生环境中实施预先医疗照护计划的障碍和促进因素——在开垦新领域时应该关注哪些方面?
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Jun 23;23(1):387. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04060-4.
7
Place of Death From Cancer in US States With vs Without Palliative Care Laws.美国有姑息治疗法和无姑息治疗法的州的癌症死亡地点。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jun 1;6(6):e2317247. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.17247.
8
Death place and palliative outcome indicators in patients under palliative home care service: an observational study.在接受姑息治疗居家护理服务的患者中,死亡地点和姑息治疗结局指标:一项观察性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Apr 19;22(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01167-8.
9
Learning needs and perceived barriers and facilitators to end-of-life care: a survey of front-line nurses on acute medical wards.学习需求以及临终关怀的感知障碍和促进因素:对急性内科病房一线护士的调查。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Apr;12(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002219.
10
Stakeholders barriers and facilitators for the implementation of a personalised digital care pathway: a qualitative study.利益相关者在实施个性化数字护理路径方面的障碍和促进因素:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 23;12(11):e065778. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065778.