Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, Chicago, IL, USA.
Center of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomic Research, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018 Feb 1;57(2):273-282. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex049.
TNF-α inhibitors (TNFIs) have a black box warning for increased risk of serious infection that was based on evidence from studies of adults. Evidence of the association is lacking for children. We aimed to examine the risk of infection posed by TNFIs compared with DMARDs in children with JIA.
We conducted a cohort study using the 2009-13 Truven MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database. Children <16 years old with JIA who initiated monotherapy with TNFIs or DMARDs were identified and followed for occurrence of serious bacterial infection requiring hospitalization. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios for infection associated with TNFIs compared with DMARDs, adjusting for potential confounders with high-dimensional propensity scores and time-varying CS use.
We identified 2013 DMARD initiators and 482 TNFI initiators with a mean follow-up of 255 and 307 days, respectively. We identified 18 and 11 patients with a serious infection in the DMARD and TNFI groups, resulting in crude rates of 1.28 (95% CI 0.76-2.02) and 2.72 (95%CI 1.36-4.86) per 100 person-years, respectively. In adjusted models, TNFIs were associated with an increased risk of serious bacterial infection compared with DMARDs (adjusted hazard ratio 2.72, 95% CI: 1.08, 6.86).
Use of TNFIs poses a higher risk of serious infection compared with DMARDs in children with JIA. Our analysis confirms the US Food and Drug Administration warning about TNFI-associated infection in children with JIA.
TNF-α 抑制剂(TNFIs)存在增加严重感染风险的黑框警告,该警告基于成人研究的证据。然而,儿童感染风险的相关证据尚缺乏。我们旨在研究与接受 DMARD 治疗的儿童相比,接受 TNFIs 治疗的儿童发生感染的风险。
我们使用了 2009-2013 年 Truven MarketScan 商业索赔和就诊数据库进行了一项队列研究。我们识别出了起始接受 TNFIs 或 DMARD 单药治疗的年龄<16 岁的 JIA 患儿,并对其进行随访,以记录发生需要住院治疗的严重细菌感染的情况。采用 Cox 比例风险模型估计与 DMARD 相比,TNFIs 治疗与感染相关的风险比(HR),使用高维倾向评分和时变 CS 使用情况调整潜在混杂因素。
我们识别出了 2013 名 DMARD 起始治疗者和 482 名 TNFI 起始治疗者,平均随访时间分别为 255 天和 307 天。DMARD 和 TNFI 组分别有 18 例和 11 例患者发生严重感染,导致感染发生率分别为 1.28(95%CI 0.76-2.02)和 2.72(95%CI 1.36-4.86)/100 人年。在调整后的模型中,与 DMARD 相比,TNFIs 与严重细菌感染风险增加相关(调整 HR 2.72,95%CI:1.08,6.86)。
与 DMARD 相比,JIA 儿童使用 TNFIs 治疗与严重感染风险增加相关。我们的分析证实了美国食品和药物管理局关于 JIA 儿童中 TNFIs 相关感染的警告。