Generali Daniele, Montemurro Filippo, Bordonaro Roberto, Mafodda Antonino, Romito Sante, Michelotti Andrea, Piovano Pierluigi, Ionta Maria Teresa, Bighin Claudia, Sartori Donata, Frassoldati Antonio, Cazzaniga Marina Elena, Riccardi Ferdinando, Testore Franco, Vici Patrizia, Barone Carlo Antonio, Schirone Alessio, Piacentini Federico, Nolè Franco, Molino Annamaria, Latini Luciano, Simoncini Edda Lucia, Roila Fausto, Cognetti Francesco, Nuzzo Francesco, Foglietta Jennifer, Minisini Alessandro Marco, Goffredo Francesca, Portera Giuseppe, Ascione Gilda, Mariani Gabriella
Breast Cancer Unit and Molecular Therapy Unit, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale di Cremona, Cremona, Italy
Divisione di Oncologia Clinica Investigativa dell'Istituto di Candiolo-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy.
Oncologist. 2017 Jun;22(6):648-654. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0461. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
The BALLET study was an open-label, multicenter, expanded access study designed to allow treatment with everolimus plus exemestane in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer progressed following prior endocrine therapy. A post hoc analysis to evaluate if previous chemotherapy in the metastatic setting affects the safety profile of the combination regimen of everolimus and exemestane was conducted on the Italian subset, as it represented the major part of the patients enrolled (54%).
One thousand one hundred and fifty-one Italian patients were included in the present post hoc analysis, which focused on two sets of patients: patients who never received chemotherapy in the metastatic setting (36.1%) and patients who received at least one chemotherapy treatment in the metastatic setting (63.9%).
One thousand one hundred and sixteen patients (97.0%) prematurely discontinued the study drug, and the main reasons reported were disease progression (39.1%), local reimbursement of everolimus (31.1%), and adverse events (AEs) (16.1%). The median duration of study treatment exposure was 139.5 days for exemestane and 135.0 days for everolimus. At least one AE was experienced by 92.5% of patients. The incidence of everolimus-related AEs was higher (83.9%) when compared with those that occurred with exemestane (29.1%), and the most commonly reported everolimus-related AE was stomatitis (51.3%). However, no significant difference in terms of safety related to the combination occurred between patients without and with chemotherapy in the metastatic setting.
Real-life data of the Italian patients BALLET-related cohort were an adequate setting to state that previous chemotherapy did not affect the safety profile of the combination regimen of everolimus and exemestane.
With the advent of new targeted agents for advanced or metastatic breast cancer, multiple lines of therapy may be possible, and components of the combined regimens can overlap from one line to another. Thus, it is important to assess even the potential of cumulative and additive toxic effects among the drugs. Previous chemotherapy did not affect the safety profile of the combination regimen of everolimus and exemestane. The continuous monitoring of the safety signals of this drug combination from general clinical practice is important, in particular for stomatitis.
BALLET研究是一项开放标签、多中心、扩大准入研究,旨在允许绝经后激素受体阳性转移性乳腺癌患者在先前内分泌治疗后病情进展时接受依维莫司联合依西美坦治疗。对意大利亚组进行了一项事后分析,以评估转移性环境中既往化疗是否会影响依维莫司和依西美坦联合方案的安全性,因为意大利亚组代表了入组患者的主要部分(54%)。
本事后分析纳入了1151例意大利患者,重点关注两组患者:转移性环境中从未接受过化疗的患者(36.1%)和转移性环境中接受过至少一次化疗治疗的患者(63.9%)。
1116例患者(97.0%)提前停用研究药物,报告的主要原因是疾病进展(39.1%)、依维莫司的当地报销(31.1%)和不良事件(AE)(16.1%)。依西美坦的研究治疗暴露中位持续时间为139.5天,依维莫司为135.0天。92.5%的患者经历了至少一次AE。与依西美坦发生的AE(29.1%)相比,依维莫司相关AE的发生率更高(83.9%),最常报告的依维莫司相关AE是口腔炎(51.3%)。然而,转移性环境中未接受化疗和接受化疗的患者在联合用药安全性方面没有显著差异。
意大利患者BALLET相关队列的真实数据足以说明既往化疗不影响依维莫司和依西美坦联合方案的安全性。
随着晚期或转移性乳腺癌新靶向药物的出现,可能有多线治疗,联合方案的组成部分可能在不同线之间重叠。因此,评估药物之间累积和相加毒性作用的可能性很重要。既往化疗不影响依维莫司和依西美坦联合方案的安全性。持续监测该药物联合方案在一般临床实践中的安全信号很重要,尤其是对于口腔炎。