Suppr超能文献

使用国际质量指标评估新的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)检测方法,以供国际临床化学和检验医学联合会(IFCC)及美国国家糖化血红蛋白标准化计划(NGSP)参考网络采用。

Evaluating new HbA1c methods for adoption by the IFCC and NGSP reference networks using international quality targets.

作者信息

Lenters-Westra Erna, English Emma

机构信息

.

出版信息

Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017 Aug 28;55(9):1426-1434. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2017-0109.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

As a reference laboratory for HbA1c, it is essential to have accurate and precise HbA1c methods covering a range of measurement principles. We report an evaluation of the Abbott Enzymatic (Architect c4000), Roche Gen.3 HbA1c (Cobas c513) and Tosoh G11 using different quality targets.

METHODS

The effect of hemoglobin variants, other potential interferences and the performance in comparison to both the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) and the National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program (NGSP) reference systems was assessed using certified evaluation protocols.

RESULTS

Each of the evaluated HbA1c methods had CVs <3% in SI units and <2% in NGSP units at 46 mmol/mol (6.4%) and 72 mmol/mol (8.7%) and passed the NGSP criteria when compared with six secondary reference measurement procedures (SRMPs). Sigma was 8.6 for Abbott Enzymatic, 3.3 for Roche Cobas c513 and 6.9 for Tosoh G11. No clinically significant interference was detected for the common Hb variants for the three methods.

CONCLUSIONS

All three methods performed well and are suitable for clinical application in the analysis of HbA1c. Partly based on the result of this study, the Abbott Enzymatic method on the Architect c4000 and the Roche Gen.3 HbA1c on the Cobas c513 are now official, certified IFCC and NGSP SRMPs in the IFCC and NGSP networks. Sigma metrics quality criteria presented in a graph distinguish between good and excellent performance.

摘要

背景

作为糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)的参考实验室,拥有涵盖一系列测量原理的准确且精密的HbA1c检测方法至关重要。我们报告了使用不同质量目标对雅培酶法(Architect c4000)、罗氏第三代HbA1c(Cobas c513)和东曹G11进行的评估。

方法

使用经过认证的评估方案,评估血红蛋白变异体的影响、其他潜在干扰因素以及与国际临床化学和检验医学联合会(IFCC)和国家糖化血红蛋白标准化计划(NGSP)参考系统相比的性能。

结果

在46 mmol/mol(6.4%)和72 mmol/mol(8.7%)时,每种评估的HbA1c方法在国际单位制中的变异系数(CV)<3%,在NGSP单位制中的CV<2%,与六种二级参考测量程序(SRMP)相比时通过了NGSP标准。雅培酶法的西格玛值为8.6,罗氏Cobas c513为3.3,东曹G11为6.9。对于这三种方法,常见的血红蛋白变异体未检测到具有临床意义的干扰。

结论

所有三种方法表现良好,适用于HbA1c分析的临床应用。部分基于本研究结果,Architect c4000上的雅培酶法和Cobas c513上的罗氏第三代HbA1c现在是IFCC和NGSP网络中官方认证的IFCC和NGSP SRMP。以图表形式呈现的西格玛指标质量标准区分了良好和卓越的性能。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验