Suppr超能文献

基于模拟的儿科快速反应团队评估

The Simulation-Based Assessment of Pediatric Rapid Response Teams.

作者信息

Fehr James J, McBride Mary E, Boulet John R, Murray David J

机构信息

Anesthesiology & Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.

Pediatrics, Northwestern University School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.

出版信息

J Pediatr. 2017 Sep;188:258-262.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.03.030. Epub 2017 Apr 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To create scenarios of simulated decompensating pediatric patients to train pediatric rapid response teams (RRTs) and to determine whether the scenario scores provide a valid assessment of RRT performance with the hypothesis that RRTs led by intensivists-in-training would be better prepared to manage the scenarios than teams led by nurse practitioners.

STUDY DESIGN

A set of 10 simulated scenarios was designed for the training and assessment of pediatric RRTs. Pediatric RRTs, comprising a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) registered nurse and respiratory therapist, led by a PICU intensivist-in-training or a pediatric nurse practitioner, managed 7 simulated acutely decompensating patients. Two raters evaluated the scenario performances and psychometric analyses of the scenarios were performed.

RESULTS

The teams readily managed scenarios such as supraventricular tachycardia and opioid overdose but had difficulty with more complicated scenarios such as aortic coarctation or head injury. The management of any particular scenario was reasonably predictive of overall team performance. The teams led by the PICU intensivists-in-training outperformed the teams led by the pediatric nurse practitioners.

CONCLUSIONS

Simulation provides a method for RRTs to develop decision-making skills in managing decompensating pediatric patients. The multiple scenario assessment provided a moderately reliable team score. The greater scores achieved by PICU intensivist-in-training-led teams provides some evidence to support the validity of the assessment.

摘要

目的

创建模拟失代偿儿科患者的场景,以培训儿科快速反应团队(RRT),并确定场景评分是否能有效评估RRT的表现,假设由实习重症监护医生领导的RRT比由执业护士领导的团队更有能力应对这些场景。

研究设计

设计了一组10个模拟场景,用于培训和评估儿科RRT。儿科RRT由一名儿科重症监护病房(PICU)注册护士和呼吸治疗师组成,由一名PICU实习重症监护医生或一名儿科执业护士领导,负责处理7名模拟急性失代偿患者。两名评估者对场景表现进行评估,并对场景进行心理测量分析。

结果

团队能够轻松应对室上性心动过速和阿片类药物过量等场景,但在处理诸如主动脉缩窄或头部受伤等更复杂的场景时遇到困难。对任何特定场景的处理都能合理预测团队的整体表现。由PICU实习重症监护医生领导的团队表现优于由儿科执业护士领导的团队。

结论

模拟为RRT提供了一种在管理失代偿儿科患者时培养决策技能的方法。多场景评估提供了一个中等可靠的团队评分。由PICU实习重症监护医生领导的团队获得的更高分数为评估的有效性提供了一些证据支持。

相似文献

1
The Simulation-Based Assessment of Pediatric Rapid Response Teams.
J Pediatr. 2017 Sep;188:258-262.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.03.030. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
2
Simulation and the diagnostic process: a pilot study of trauma and rapid response teams.
Diagnosis (Berl). 2017 Nov 27;4(4):241-249. doi: 10.1515/dx-2017-0010.
4
Improving Resident Performance Through a Simulated Rapid Response Team: A Pilot Study.
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2015 Jul;115(7):444-50. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2015.090.
6
Rapid Response Teams: Is it Time to Reframe the Questions of Rapid Response Team Measurement?
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2016 Nov;48(6):616-623. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12252. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
8
Evaluating a new rapid response team: NP-led versus intensivist-led comparisons.
AACN Adv Crit Care. 2012 Jan-Mar;23(1):32-42. doi: 10.1097/NCI.0b013e318240e2f9.
10
A More Rapid, Rapid Response.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016 Sep;17(9):871-5. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000855.

引用本文的文献

1
Reliability of simulation-based assessment for practicing physicians: performance is context-specific.
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Apr 12;21(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02617-8.
2
An Advanced Boot Camp for Pediatric Anesthesiology Fellows.
J Educ Perioper Med. 2020 Apr 1;22(2):E641. doi: 10.46374/volxxii-issue2-njoku. eCollection 2020 Apr-Jun.

本文引用的文献

2
Rapid response teams improve outcomes: no.
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Apr;42(4):596-598. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4246-2. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
3
Rapid response systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Crit Care. 2015 Jun 12;19(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0973-y.
4
Communication at pediatric rapid response events: a survey of health care providers.
Hosp Pediatr. 2015 Jun;5(6):301-8. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2014-0120.
5
Decision making in trauma settings: simulation to improve diagnostic skills.
Simul Healthc. 2015 Jun;10(3):139-45. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000073.
6
Prevalence, characteristics, and opinions of pediatric rapid response teams in the United States.
Hosp Pediatr. 2012 Jul;2(3):133-40. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2011-0030.
7
Impact of rapid response system implementation on critical deterioration events in children.
JAMA Pediatr. 2014 Jan;168(1):25-33. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.3266.
9
A comprehensive patient safety program can significantly reduce preventable harm, associated costs, and hospital mortality.
J Pediatr. 2013 Dec;163(6):1638-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.06.031. Epub 2013 Jul 30.
10
Development of a pragmatic measure for evaluating and optimizing rapid response systems.
Pediatrics. 2012 Apr;129(4):e874-81. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-2784. Epub 2012 Mar 5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验