Division of General Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania2Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia3Center for Pediatric Clinical Effectiveness, The Children's.
Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
JAMA Pediatr. 2014 Jan;168(1):25-33. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.3266.
Rapid response systems aim to identify and rescue deteriorating hospitalized patients. Previous pediatric rapid response system implementation studies have shown variable effectiveness in preventing rare, catastrophic outcomes such as cardiac arrest and death.
To evaluate the impact of pediatric rapid response system implementation inclusive of a medical emergency team and an early warning score on critical deterioration, a proximate outcome defined as unplanned transfer to the intensive care unit with noninvasive or invasive mechanical ventilation or vasopressor infusion in the 12 hours after transfer.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Quasi-experimental study with interrupted time series analysis using piecewise regression. At an urban, tertiary care children's hospital in the United States, we evaluated 1810 unplanned transfers from the general medical and surgical wards to the pediatric and neonatal intensive care units that occurred during 370,504 non-intensive care patient-days between July 1, 2007, and May 31, 2012.
Implementation of a hospital-wide rapid response system inclusive of a medical emergency team and an early warning score in February 2010.
Rate of critical deterioration events, adjusted for season, ward, and case mix.
Rapid response system implementation was associated with a significant downward change in the preintervention trajectory of critical deterioration and a 62% net decrease relative to the preintervention trend (adjusted incidence rate ratio = 0.38; 95% CI, 0.20-0.75). We observed absolute reductions in ward cardiac arrests (from 0.03 to 0.01 per 1000 non-intensive care patient-days) and deaths during ward emergencies (from 0.01 to 0.00 per 1000 non-intensive care patient-days), but these were not statistically significant (P = .21 and P = .99, respectively). Among all unplanned transfers, critical deterioration was associated with a 4.97-fold increased risk of death (95% CI, 3.33-7.40; P < .001).
Rapid response system implementation reversed an increasing trend of critical deterioration. Cardiac arrest and death were extremely rare at baseline, and their reductions were not statistically significant despite using nearly 5 years of data. Hospitals seeking to measure rapid response system performance may consider using valid proximate outcomes like critical deterioration in addition to rare, catastrophic outcomes.
快速反应系统旨在识别和抢救病情恶化的住院患者。先前的儿科快速反应系统实施研究表明,在预防罕见的灾难性结果(如心脏骤停和死亡)方面,其效果存在差异。
评估包括医疗急救小组和早期预警评分在内的儿科快速反应系统实施对危急恶化的影响,危急恶化是指在转移后 12 小时内计划外转入重症监护病房,需要无创或有创机械通气或血管加压素输注的近因结果。
设计、地点和参与者:使用分段回归的准实验研究,时间序列分析。在美国一家城市三级保健儿童医院,我们评估了 2007 年 7 月 1 日至 2012 年 5 月 31 日期间在普通医疗和外科病房发生的 1810 例计划外转移至儿科和新生儿重症监护病房的病例,这些病例发生在 370504 例非重症监护患者日期间。
2010 年 2 月实施全院范围的快速反应系统,包括医疗急救小组和早期预警评分。
危急恶化事件的发生率,调整季节、病房和病例组合因素。
快速反应系统的实施与危急恶化的前期轨迹呈显著下降趋势,与前期趋势相比,下降了 62%(校正发病率比=0.38;95%置信区间,0.20-0.75)。我们观察到病房心脏骤停(从每 1000 例非重症监护患者日 0.03 例降至 0.01 例)和病房紧急情况下死亡(从每 1000 例非重症监护患者日 0.01 例降至 0.00 例)的绝对减少,但这些变化无统计学意义(P=0.21 和 P=0.99)。在所有计划外转移中,危急恶化与死亡风险增加 4.97 倍相关(95%置信区间,3.33-7.40;P<0.001)。
快速反应系统的实施扭转了危急恶化的上升趋势。在基线时,心脏骤停和死亡极为罕见,尽管使用了近 5 年的数据,但这些结果的统计学意义不大。医院在衡量快速反应系统的效果时,可以考虑除罕见的灾难性结果外,还使用危急恶化等有效近因结果。