Koodaryan Roodabeh, Hafezeqoran Ali, Khakpour Maleki Amin
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Dentist, Private Practice, Tabriz, Iran.
J Adv Prosthodont. 2017 Apr;9(2):110-117. doi: 10.4047/jap.2017.9.2.110. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
This laboratory study assessed the effect of different dentin cleaning procedures on shear bond strength of resin cements for recementing prosthesis.
4 × 4 flat surface was prepared on the labial surface of 52 maxillary central incisors. Metal frames (4 × 4 × 1.5 mm) were cast with nickel-chromium alloy. All specimens were randomly divided into 2 groups to be cemented with either Panavia F2.0 (P) or RelyX Ultimate (U) cement. The initial shear bond strength was recorded by Universal Testing Machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Debonded specimens were randomly allocated into 2 subgroups (n = 13) according to the dentin cleaning procedures for recementation. The residual cement on bonded dentin surfaces was eliminated with either pumice slurry (p) or tungsten carbide bur (c). The restorations were rebonded with the same cement and were subjected to shear test. Data failed the normality test ( < .05), thus were analyzed with Mann Whitney U-test, Wilcoxon signed rank test, and two-way ANOVA after logarithmic transformation (α = .05).
The initial shear bond strength of group P was significantly higher than group U ( = .001). Pc and Uc groups presented higher bond strength after recementation compared to the initial bond strength. However, it was significant only in Pc group ( = .034).
The specimens recemented with Panavia F2.0 provided higher bond strength than RelyX Ultimate cement. Moreover, a tungsten carbide bur was a more efficient method in removing the residual resin cement and increased the bond strength of Panavia F2.0 cement after recementation.
本实验室研究评估了不同牙本质清洁程序对用于修复体再粘结的树脂水门汀剪切粘结强度的影响。
在52颗上颌中切牙的唇面制备4×4平面。用镍铬合金铸造金属框架(4×4×1.5mm)。所有标本随机分为2组,分别用Panavia F2.0(P)或RelyX Ultimate(U)水门汀粘结。通过万能试验机以0.5mm/min的十字头速度记录初始剪切粘结强度。根据再粘结的牙本质清洁程序,将脱粘的标本随机分为2个亚组(n = 13)。用浮石浆(p)或碳化钨车针(c)清除粘结牙本质表面的残留水门汀。修复体用相同的水门汀重新粘结并进行剪切试验。数据未通过正态性检验(<.05),因此在对数转换后用Mann Whitney U检验、Wilcoxon符号秩检验和双向方差分析进行分析(α = .05)。
P组的初始剪切粘结强度显著高于U组(=.001)。与初始粘结强度相比,Pc组和Uc组在再粘结后呈现出更高的粘结强度。然而,仅在Pc组中具有显著性(=.034)。
用Panavia F2.0粘结的标本比RelyX Ultimate水门汀具有更高的粘结强度。此外,碳化钨车针是去除残留树脂水门汀的更有效方法,并提高了Panavia F2.0水门汀再粘结后的粘结强度。