University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Feb;70(2):221-229. doi: 10.1002/acr.23262. Epub 2017 Dec 29.
This double-blind randomized controlled trial aimed to test the efficacy of self-administered acupressure for pain and physical function improvement for older adults with knee osteoarthritis (OA).
Participants were community-dwelling adults with symptomatic knee OA (n = 150, mean age 73 years), randomized to 1 of 3 groups: verum acupressure, sham acupressure, or usual care. Participants in the verum and sham groups, but not those in the usual care group, were taught to self-apply acupressure once daily, 5 days/week for 8 weeks. Assessments were collected during center visits at baseline, and at 4 and 8 weeks. In addition, pain level was assessed weekly by phone using a numeric rating scale (NRS). Outcomes included the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale (primary), and subjective and objective physical function measures and the NRS and physical function measures (secondary). Linear mixed regression analysis was conducted to test between-group differences in mean changes from baseline for the outcomes at 8 weeks.
Compared with usual care, both verum and sham acupressure participants experienced significant improvements in WOMAC pain (mean difference -1.27 units [95% confidence interval (95% CI) -1.95, -0.58] and -1.24 units [95% CI -1.92, -0.55], respectively), NRS pain (-0.74 units [95% CI -1.24, -0.24] and -0.51 units [95% CI -1.01, -0.01], respectively), and WOMAC function (-4.83 units [95% CI -6.99, -2.67] and -4.21 units [95% CI -6.37, -2.04], respectively) at 8 weeks. There were no significant differences between the verum and sham acupressure groups on any of the outcomes.
Self-administered acupressure is superior to usual care in pain and physical function improvement for older adults with knee OA. The reason for the benefits is unclear, and the placebo effect may play a role.
本项双盲随机对照试验旨在检验自我实施穴位按压对膝骨关节炎(OA)老年患者疼痛和身体功能改善的疗效。
参与者为 150 名有症状的膝骨关节炎社区居住成年人(平均年龄 73 岁),随机分为 3 组:真穴位按压组、假穴位按压组和常规护理组。真穴位按压组和假穴位按压组的参与者,但不包括常规护理组的参与者,被教授自行每天实施穴位按压 1 次,每周 5 天,共 8 周。在基线、4 周和 8 周时,在中心就诊进行评估。此外,每周通过电话使用数字评分量表(NRS)评估疼痛水平。结局包括西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)疼痛子量表(主要结局),以及主观和客观身体功能测量以及 NRS 和身体功能测量(次要结局)。采用线性混合回归分析检验 8 周时结局的组间平均变化差异。
与常规护理相比,真穴位按压组和假穴位按压组参与者的 WOMAC 疼痛(平均差异-1.27 单位[95%置信区间(95%CI)-1.95,-0.58]和-1.24 单位[95%CI-1.92,-0.55])、NRS 疼痛(-0.74 单位[95%CI-1.24,-0.24]和-0.51 单位[95%CI-1.01,-0.01])和 WOMAC 功能(-4.83 单位[95%CI-6.99,-2.67]和-4.21 单位[95%CI-6.37,-2.04])均有显著改善,8 周时。在任何结局上,真穴位按压组和假穴位按压组之间均无显著差异。
自我实施穴位按压在膝骨关节炎老年患者的疼痛和身体功能改善方面优于常规护理。获益的原因尚不清楚,安慰剂效应可能起作用。