Sha Li Z, Remington Roger W, Jiang Yuhong V
Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, S504 Elliott Hall, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Jul;79(5):1311-1322. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1317-6.
It has long been known that frequently occurring targets are attended better than infrequent ones in visual search. But does this frequency-based attentional prioritization reflect momentary or durable changes in attention? Here we observed both short-term and long-term attentional biases for visual features as a function of different types of statistical associations between the targets, distractors, and features. Participants searched for a target, a line oriented horizontally or vertically among diagonal distractors, and reported its length. In one set of experiments we manipulated the target's color probability: Targets were more often in Color 1 than in Color 2. The distractors were in other colors. Participants found Color 1 targets more quickly than Color 2 targets, but this preference disappeared immediately when the target's color became random in the subsequent testing phase. In the other set of experiments, we manipulated the diagnostic values of the two colors: Color 1 was more often a target than a distractor; Color 2 was more often a distractor than a target. Participants found Color 1 targets more quickly than Color 2 targets. Importantly, and in contrast to the first set of experiments, the featural preference was sustained in the testing phase. These results suggest that short-term and long-term attentional biases are products of different statistical information. Finding a target momentarily activates its features, inducing short-term repetition priming. Long-term changes in attention, on the other hand, may rely on learning diagnostic features of the targets.
长期以来,人们一直知道,在视觉搜索中,频繁出现的目标比不频繁出现的目标更容易被关注。但是,这种基于频率的注意力优先级是反映了注意力的瞬间变化还是持久变化呢?在这里,我们观察到视觉特征的短期和长期注意力偏差,这是目标、干扰物和特征之间不同类型统计关联的函数。参与者在对角线干扰物中搜索水平或垂直方向的目标线,并报告其长度。在一组实验中,我们操纵了目标的颜色概率:目标在颜色1中出现的频率高于颜色2。干扰物是其他颜色。参与者找到颜色1的目标比颜色2的目标更快,但当目标颜色在随后的测试阶段变得随机时,这种偏好立即消失。在另一组实验中,我们操纵了两种颜色的诊断价值:颜色1更常是目标而非干扰物;颜色2更常是干扰物而非目标。参与者找到颜色1的目标比颜色2的目标更快。重要的是,与第一组实验不同,在测试阶段特征偏好得以持续。这些结果表明,短期和长期注意力偏差是不同统计信息的产物。找到一个目标会瞬间激活其特征,引发短期重复启动。另一方面,注意力的长期变化可能依赖于学习目标的诊断特征。