Muthu Valliappan, Dhooria Sahajal, Aggarwal Ashutosh N, Behera Digambar, Sehgal Inderpaul Singh, Agarwal Ritesh
All authors: Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Crit Care Med. 2017 Oct;45(10):e1087-e1090. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002479.
Whether tuberculosis-related acute respiratory distress syndrome is associated with worse outcomes when compared with acute respiratory distress syndrome secondary to other causes remains unknown. Herein, we compare the outcomes between the two groups.
Retrospective analysis of all subjects admitted with acute respiratory distress syndrome over the last 16 years.
Respiratory ICU of a tertiary care hospital in North India.
Consecutive subjects with acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Subjects were categorized as tuberculosis-related acute respiratory distress syndrome and acute respiratory distress syndrome-others and were managed with mechanical ventilation using the low tidal volume strategy as per the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrom Network protocol.
The baseline clinical and demographic characteristics, lung mechanics, and mortality were compared between the two groups. Factors predicting ICU survival were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression analysis. During the study period, 469 patients (18 tuberculosis-related acute respiratory distress syndrome and 451 acute respiratory distress syndrome-others) with acute respiratory distress syndrome were admitted. The mean (SD) age of the study population (52.9% women) was 33.6 years (14.8 yr). The baseline parameters and the lung mechanics were similar between the two groups. There were 132 deaths (28.1%) with no difference between the two groups (tuberculosis-related acute respiratory distress syndrome vs acute respiratory distress syndrome-others; 27.7% vs 28.2%; p = 0.71). There was also no significant difference in the ventilator-free days, ICU, and the hospital length of stay. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, the factors predicting survival were the admission Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score and baseline driving pressure after adjusting for PaO2:FIO2 ratio, gender, and the etiology of acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Tuberculosis is an uncommon cause of acute respiratory distress syndrome even in high tuberculosis prevalence countries. Acute respiratory distress syndrome due to tuberculosis behaves like acute respiratory distress syndrome due to other causes and does not affect the ICU survival.
与其他原因所致的急性呼吸窘迫综合征相比,结核病相关的急性呼吸窘迫综合征是否与更差的预后相关仍不清楚。在此,我们比较两组的预后情况。
对过去16年中所有因急性呼吸窘迫综合征入院的患者进行回顾性分析。
印度北部一家三级护理医院的呼吸重症监护病房。
连续的急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者。
将患者分为结核病相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征组和其他原因所致急性呼吸窘迫综合征组,并根据急性呼吸窘迫综合征网络协议采用低潮气量策略进行机械通气治疗。
比较两组的基线临床和人口统计学特征、肺力学指标及死亡率。采用多因素逻辑回归分析预测重症监护病房(ICU)生存的因素。在研究期间,共收治469例急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者(18例结核病相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者和451例其他原因所致急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者)。研究人群的平均(标准差)年龄为33.6岁(14.8岁),女性占52.9%。两组的基线参数和肺力学指标相似。共有132例死亡(28.1%),两组之间无差异(结核病相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征组与其他原因所致急性呼吸窘迫综合征组;27.7% vs 28.2%;p = 0.71)。在无呼吸机天数、ICU住院时间和住院总时长方面也无显著差异。多因素逻辑回归分析显示,在调整了动脉血氧分压与吸入氧浓度比值、性别及急性呼吸窘迫综合征病因后,预测生存的因素为入院时急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)评分和基线驱动压。
即使在结核病高流行国家,结核病也是急性呼吸窘迫综合征的罕见病因。结核病所致急性呼吸窘迫综合征的表现与其他原因所致急性呼吸窘迫综合征相似,不影响ICU生存率。