• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

适当联合治疗对产碳青霉烯酶肠杆菌科血流感染患者死亡率的影响(INCREMENT):一项回顾性队列研究。

Effect of appropriate combination therapy on mortality of patients with bloodstream infections due to carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (INCREMENT): a retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Unidad Clínica de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.

National Taiwan University Hospital, Zhongzheng District, Taipei City, Taiwan.

出版信息

Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Jul;17(7):726-734. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30228-1. Epub 2017 Apr 22.

DOI:10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30228-1
PMID:28442293
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The best available treatment against carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) is unknown. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of appropriate therapy and of appropriate combination therapy on mortality of patients with bloodstream infections (BSIs) due to CPE.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we included patients with clinically significant monomicrobial BSIs due to CPE from the INCREMENT cohort, recruited from 26 tertiary hospitals in ten countries. Exclusion criteria were missing key data, death sooner than 24 h after the index date, therapy with an active antibiotic for at least 2 days when blood cultures were taken, and subsequent episodes in the same patient. We compared 30 day all-cause mortality between patients receiving appropriate (including an active drug against the blood isolate and started in the first 5 days after infection) or inappropriate therapy, and for patients receiving appropriate therapy, between those receiving active monotherapy (only one active drug) or combination therapy (more than one). We used a propensity score for receiving combination therapy and a validated mortality score (INCREMENT-CPE mortality score) to control for confounders in Cox regression analyses. We stratified analyses of combination therapy according to INCREMENT-CPE mortality score (0-7 [low mortality score] vs 8-15 [high mortality score]). INCREMENT is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01764490.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 1, 2004, and Dec 31, 2013, 480 patients with BSIs due to CPE were enrolled in the INCREMENT cohort, of whom we included 437 (91%) in this study. 343 (78%) patients received appropriate therapy compared with 94 (22%) who received inappropriate therapy. The most frequent organism was Klebsiella pneumoniae (375 [86%] of 437; 291 [85%] of 343 patients receiving appropriate therapy vs 84 [89%] of 94 receiving inappropriate therapy) and the most frequent carbapenemase was K pneumoniae carbapenemase (329 [75%]; 253 [74%] vs 76 [81%]). Appropriate therapy was associated with lower mortality than was inappropriate therapy (132 [38·5%] of 343 patients died vs 57 [60·6%] of 94; absolute difference 22·1% [95% CI 11·0-33·3]; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·45 [95% CI 0·33-0·62]; p<0·0001). Among those receiving appropriate therapy, 135 (39%) received combination therapy and 208 (61%) received monotherapy. Overall mortality was not different between those receiving combination therapy or monotherapy (47 [35%] of 135 vs 85 [41%] of 208; adjusted HR 1·63 [95% CI 0·67-3·91]; p=0·28). However, combination therapy was associated with lower mortality than was monotherapy in the high-mortality-score stratum (30 [48%] of 63 vs 64 [62%] of 103; adjusted HR 0·56 [0·34-0·91]; p=0·02), but not in the low-mortality-score stratum (17 [24%] of 72 vs 21 [20%] of 105; adjusted odds ratio 1·21 [0·56-2·56]; p=0·62).

INTERPRETATION

Appropriate therapy was associated with a protective effect on mortality among patients with BSIs due to CPE. Combination therapy was associated with improved survival only in patients with a high mortality score. Patients with BSIs due to CPE should receive active therapy as soon as they are diagnosed, and monotherapy should be considered for those in the low-mortality-score stratum.

FUNDING

Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases, European Development Regional Fund, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, and Innovative Medicines Initiative.

摘要

背景

针对产碳青霉烯酶肠杆菌科(CPE)的最佳治疗方法尚不清楚。本研究的目的是调查适当治疗和适当联合治疗对产碳青霉烯酶血流感染(BSI)患者死亡率的影响。

方法

在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们纳入了来自 10 个国家的 26 家三级医院的 INCREMENT 队列中患有临床显著的单一致病菌 CPE 引起的 BSI 患者。排除标准为关键数据缺失、指数日期后 24 小时内死亡、在采血时至少接受了 2 天的活性抗生素治疗以及同一患者随后发生的其他感染。我们比较了接受适当治疗(包括针对血液分离株的活性药物和在感染后 5 天内开始治疗)和不适当治疗的患者 30 天全因死亡率,以及接受适当治疗的患者接受活性单药治疗(仅一种活性药物)或联合治疗(多种)的患者死亡率。我们使用了倾向评分来接受联合治疗,并使用了经过验证的死亡率评分(INCREMENT-CPE 死亡率评分)来控制 Cox 回归分析中的混杂因素。我们根据 INCREMENT-CPE 死亡率评分(0-7 [低死亡率评分] 与 8-15 [高死亡率评分])对联合治疗的分析进行分层。INCREMENT 在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,编号为 NCT01764490。

结果

2004 年 1 月 1 日至 2013 年 12 月 31 日,480 例 CPE 引起的 BSI 患者纳入 INCREMENT 队列,其中 437 例(91%)纳入本研究。343 例患者接受了适当治疗,94 例患者接受了不适当治疗。最常见的病原体是肺炎克雷伯菌(375 例[86%],437 例中 343 例接受适当治疗与 94 例接受不适当治疗),最常见的碳青霉烯酶是肺炎克雷伯菌碳青霉烯酶(329 例[75%];253 例[74%]接受适当治疗与 84 例[89%]接受不适当治疗)。适当治疗与死亡率降低相关,不适当治疗的死亡率为 38.5%(343 例患者中 132 例死亡),不适当治疗的死亡率为 60.6%(94 例患者中 57 例死亡);绝对差异为 22.1%(95%CI 11.0-33.3);调整后的危险比(HR)为 0.45(95%CI 0.33-0.62);p<0.0001)。在接受适当治疗的患者中,135 例(39%)接受联合治疗,208 例(61%)接受单药治疗。联合治疗或单药治疗的总体死亡率无差异(135 例患者中 47 例[35%]死亡与 208 例患者中 85 例[41%]死亡;调整后的 HR 为 1.63(95%CI 0.67-3.91);p=0.28)。然而,在高死亡率评分组中,联合治疗与死亡率降低相关,而在低死亡率评分组中则无相关性(63 例患者中 30 例[48%]死亡与 103 例患者中 64 例[62%]死亡;调整后的 HR 为 0.56(0.34-0.91);p=0.02),但在低死亡率评分组中则无相关性(72 例患者中 17 例[24%]死亡与 105 例患者中 21 例[20%]死亡;调整后的比值比为 1.21(0.56-2.56);p=0.62)。

结论

针对产碳青霉烯酶肠杆菌科引起的血流感染患者,适当治疗与死亡率降低相关。联合治疗仅在死亡率高的患者中与生存率提高相关。产碳青霉烯酶血流感染患者应在确诊后尽快接受积极治疗,对于低死亡率评分组的患者应考虑单药治疗。

资金来源

西班牙传染病研究网络、欧洲发展区域基金、西班牙卡洛斯三世卫生研究所和创新药物倡议。

相似文献

1
Effect of appropriate combination therapy on mortality of patients with bloodstream infections due to carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (INCREMENT): a retrospective cohort study.适当联合治疗对产碳青霉烯酶肠杆菌科血流感染患者死亡率的影响(INCREMENT):一项回顾性队列研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Jul;17(7):726-734. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30228-1. Epub 2017 Apr 22.
2
Combination therapy with polymyxin B for carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infection.多黏菌素 B 联合治疗产碳青霉烯酶肺炎克雷伯菌血流感染。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2019 Feb;53(2):152-157. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.10.010. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
3
Predictors of mortality in patients with bloodstream infections caused by KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and impact of appropriate antimicrobial treatment.产碳青霉烯酶肺炎克雷伯菌血流感染患者的死亡预测因素及恰当抗菌治疗的影响。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011 Dec;17(12):1798-803. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03514.x. Epub 2011 May 20.
4
Time to appropriate antibiotic therapy is a predictor of outcome in patients with bloodstream infection caused by KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae.及时应用抗生素治疗是产 KPC 肺炎克雷伯菌血流感染患者预后的预测因素。
Crit Care. 2020 Jan 30;24(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-2742-9.
5
Predictors of mortality in bloodstream infections caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae: importance of combination therapy.产碳青霉烯酶肺炎克雷伯菌血流感染患者的死亡率预测因素:联合治疗的重要性。
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Oct;55(7):943-50. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis588. Epub 2012 Jul 2.
6
Treatment Outcome of Bacteremia Due to Non-Carbapenemase-producing Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Bacteremia: Role of Carbapenem Combination Therapy.产非碳青霉烯酶碳青霉烯类耐药肺炎克雷伯菌血症的治疗转归:碳青霉烯类联合治疗的作用。
Clin Ther. 2020 Mar;42(3):e33-e44. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.01.004. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
7
Bloodstream infections caused by metallo-β-lactamase/Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae among intensive care unit patients in Greece: risk factors for infection and impact of type of resistance on outcomes.希腊重症监护病房患者中产金属β-内酰胺酶/肺炎克雷伯菌碳青霉烯酶的肺炎克雷伯菌引起的血流感染:感染的危险因素和耐药类型对结局的影响。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 Dec;31(12):1250-6. doi: 10.1086/657135. Epub 2010 Oct 25.
8
Clinical and Microbiological Analysis of Risk Factors for Mortality in Patients with Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Bacteremia.碳青霉烯类耐药肠杆菌科菌血症患者死亡的临床和微生物危险因素分析。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020 Oct;56(4):106126. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106126. Epub 2020 Aug 2.
9
A Predictive Model of Mortality in Patients With Bloodstream Infections due to Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae.产碳青霉烯酶肠杆菌科血流感染患者死亡率的预测模型。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2016 Oct;91(10):1362-1371. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.06.024.
10
Efficacy of short- versus prolonged-courses of antimicrobial therapy for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections: A propensity score-matched cohort study.碳青霉烯类耐药肺炎克雷伯菌血流感染中短疗程与长疗程抗菌治疗的疗效:倾向评分匹配队列研究。
J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2024 Aug;57(4):594-600. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2024.05.010. Epub 2024 May 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Epidemiology and outcomes of Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infection in high-risk patients in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯高危患者中耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌科细菌感染的流行病学及转归
Front Microbiol. 2025 Aug 19;16:1619611. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1619611. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparison of Effectiveness between Ceftazidime/Avibactam and Other Active Therapies for Oxacillinase-48-Producing Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Bacteremia in Taiwan.台湾地区头孢他啶/阿维巴坦与其他活性疗法治疗产超广谱β-内酰胺酶48型耐碳青霉烯类肺炎克雷伯菌血流感染的疗效比较
Infect Dis Ther. 2025 Aug 8. doi: 10.1007/s40121-025-01210-6.
3
Multicentre open-label randomised controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of colistin-based combination therapy with the best available therapy for treating hospital-acquired pneumonia or bloodstream infections caused by carbapenem-resistant (COUNT-CRE): a study protocol.
多中心开放标签随机对照试验:比较基于黏菌素的联合疗法与最佳可用疗法治疗耐碳青霉烯类细菌引起的医院获得性肺炎或血流感染的疗效和安全性(COUNT-CRE):一项研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 16;15(7):e092157. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092157.
4
Impact of overlapping fungal infection on the occurrence and prognosis of carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacilli infection.重叠真菌感染对碳青霉烯类耐药革兰阴性杆菌感染发生及预后的影响
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025 May 30;15:1523233. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1523233. eCollection 2025.
5
Evaluation of Adjunctive Aminoglycoside Therapy Compared to β-Lactam Monotherapy in Critically Ill Patients with Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections.在革兰氏阴性血流感染的重症患者中,辅助性氨基糖苷类药物治疗与β-内酰胺类单药治疗的疗效比较
Antibiotics (Basel). 2025 May 13;14(5):497. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14050497.
6
Clinical and Microbiological characteristics of patients with ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing K. pneumoniae strains.产头孢他啶/阿维巴坦耐药肺炎克雷伯菌碳青霉烯酶(KPC)的肺炎克雷伯菌菌株感染患者的临床和微生物学特征
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2025 Apr 18;24(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12941-025-00797-5.
7
Early appropriate therapy with polymyxin B reduces the mortality in burn sepsis caused by carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria: a retrospective analysis.早期使用多粘菌素B进行适当治疗可降低耐碳青霉烯类革兰氏阴性菌引起的烧伤脓毒症的死亡率:一项回顾性分析。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2025 Jun;44(6):1433-1442. doi: 10.1007/s10096-025-05119-3. Epub 2025 Apr 3.
8
Impact of Antibiotic Therapy with Ceftazidime Avibactam vs. Best Available Therapy in Adult Patients with Bacteremia Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales.头孢他啶阿维巴坦与最佳可用疗法治疗耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌科细菌所致菌血症成年患者的疗效比较
Antibiotics (Basel). 2025 Feb 24;14(3):226. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14030226.
9
Investigating Gram-negative bacilli isolates' sensitivity to ceftazidime/avibactam.研究革兰氏阴性杆菌分离株对头孢他啶/阿维巴坦的敏感性。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2025 Jan;14(1):311-316. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1272_24. Epub 2025 Jan 13.
10
Retrospective analysis of 300 microbial cell-free DNA sequencing results in routine blood stream infection diagnostics.对300例微生物游离DNA测序结果进行回顾性分析,用于常规血流感染诊断。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025 Jan 30;15:1504262. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1504262. eCollection 2025.