• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于剂量梯度的三维适形放疗计划射束权重选择算法

Dose gradient based algorithm for beam weights selection in 3D-CRT plans.

作者信息

Giżyńska Marta Krystyna, Kukołowicz Paweł F

机构信息

Department of Medical Physics, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.

Biomedical Physics Division, Institute of Experimental Physics, Faculty of Physics, University of Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2014 May 13;19(Suppl):S9-S12. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2014.03.002. eCollection 2014 May.

DOI:10.1016/j.rpor.2014.03.002
PMID:28443193
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5394718/
Abstract

AIM

In this work we test the usage of dose gradient based algorithm for the selection of beam weights in 3D-CRT plans for different cancer locations. Our algorithm is easy to implement for three fields technique with wedges defined by planner.

BACKGROUND

3D-CRT is usually realized with forward planning which is quite time consuming. Several authors published a few methods of beams weights optimization applicable to the 3D-CRT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Optimization is based on an assumption that the best plan is achieved if dose gradient at ICRU point is equal to zero. Method was tested for 120 patients, treated in our clinic in 2011-2012, with different cancer locations. For each patient, three fields conformal plan (6 MV and 15 MV X-ray) with the same geometry as proposed by experienced planners was prepared. We compared dose distributions achieved with the proposed method and those prepared by experienced planners. The homogeneity of dose distributions was compared in terms of STD and near minimum and near maximum doses in the PTV.

RESULTS

Mean difference of STD obtained by the proposed algorithm and by planners was 0.1%: 0.1% for prostate cancer, 0.3% for lung cancer, -0.1% for esophagus cancer, 0.1% for rectum cancer, -0.1% for gynecology cancer, -0.1% for stomach cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Applying the proposed algorithm leads to obtain the similar dose distribution homogeneity in the PTV as these achieved by planners and therefore can serve as a support in creating 3D-CRT plans. It is also simple to use and can significantly speed up the treatment planning process.

摘要

目的

在本研究中,我们测试了基于剂量梯度的算法在不同癌症部位的三维适形放疗(3D - CRT)计划中选择射束权重的应用。我们的算法对于由计划者定义楔形板的三野技术而言易于实现。

背景

3D - CRT通常通过正向计划来实现,这相当耗时。几位作者发表了一些适用于3D - CRT的射束权重优化方法。

材料与方法

优化基于这样一种假设,即如果国际辐射单位与测量委员会(ICRU)点处的剂量梯度等于零,则可实现最佳计划。该方法针对2011 - 2012年在我们诊所接受治疗的120例不同癌症部位的患者进行了测试。对于每位患者,准备了具有与经验丰富的计划者所提议相同几何形状的三野适形计划(6兆伏和15兆伏X射线)。我们比较了用所提议方法获得的剂量分布与经验丰富的计划者所制定的剂量分布。在PTV中,根据标准差以及接近最小和接近最大剂量来比较剂量分布的均匀性。

结果

所提议算法与计划者获得的标准差的平均差异为0.1%:前列腺癌为0.1%,肺癌为0.3%,食管癌为 - 0.1%,直肠癌为0.1%,妇科癌症为 - 0.1%,胃癌为 - 0.1%。

结论

应用所提议的算法可在PTV中获得与计划者所实现的相似的剂量分布均匀性,因此可作为创建3D - CRT计划的一种辅助手段。它使用也很简单,并且可以显著加快治疗计划过程。

相似文献

1
Dose gradient based algorithm for beam weights selection in 3D-CRT plans.基于剂量梯度的三维适形放疗计划射束权重选择算法
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2014 May 13;19(Suppl):S9-S12. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2014.03.002. eCollection 2014 May.
2
Implementation of a dose gradient method into optimization of dose distribution in prostate cancer 3D-CRT plans.将剂量梯度方法应用于前列腺癌三维适形放疗计划的剂量分布优化中。
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2014 May 3;19(6):385-91. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2014.04.007. eCollection 2014 Nov.
3
Inverse and forward optimization of one- and two-dimensional intensity-modulated radiation therapy-based treatment of concave-shaped planning target volumes: the case of prostate cancer.基于一维和二维调强放射治疗的凹形计划靶区治疗的逆向和正向优化:以前列腺癌为例
Radiother Oncol. 2003 Feb;66(2):185-95. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(02)00375-4.
4
Optimization of dose distribution with multi-leaf collimator using field-in-field technique for parallel opposing tangential beams of breast cancers.使用野中野技术通过多叶准直器优化乳腺癌平行对置切线野的剂量分布。
J Med Phys. 2008 Apr;33(2):60-3. doi: 10.4103/0971-6203.41194.
5
Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.调强放射治疗中射束几何形状与强度图的同步优化
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Jan 1;64(1):301-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.08.023. Epub 2005 Nov 14.
6
Benefit of using biologic parameters (EUD and NTCP) in IMRT optimization for treatment of intrahepatic tumors.在调强放射治疗(IMRT)优化中使用生物学参数(等效均匀剂量(EUD)和正常组织并发症概率(NTCP))治疗肝内肿瘤的益处。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Jun 1;62(2):571-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.02.033.
7
Importance of protocol target definition on the ability to spare normal tissue: an IMRT and 3D-CRT planning comparison for intraorbital tumors.方案靶区定义对正常组织 sparing 能力的重要性:眼眶内肿瘤的调强放疗(IMRT)与三维适形放疗(3D-CRT)计划比较
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Aug 1;62(5):1540-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.04.013.
8
The optimisation of wedge filters in radiotherapy of the prostate.
Radiother Oncol. 1995 Dec;37(3):209-20. doi: 10.1016/0167-8140(95)01650-3.
9
Radiotherapy of prostate cancer with or without intensity modulated beams: a planning comparison.有或无调强射束的前列腺癌放射治疗:计划比较
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000 Jun 1;47(3):639-48. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(00)00419-3.
10
Potential for reduced toxicity and dose escalation in the treatment of inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer: a comparison of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), 3D conformal radiation, and elective nodal irradiation.不可切除的非小细胞肺癌治疗中降低毒性和增加剂量的潜力:调强放射治疗(IMRT)、三维适形放疗和选择性淋巴结照射的比较
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 Nov 1;57(3):875-90. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(03)00743-0.

引用本文的文献

1
The next generation of medical physicists.下一代医学物理学家。
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2014 Mar 5;19(Suppl):S1-S2. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2014.04.010. eCollection 2014 May.
2
Multimodal treatment of gastric cancer in the west: Where are we going?西方胃癌的多模式治疗:我们将何去何从?
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jul 14;21(26):7954-69. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i26.7954.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of two algorithms for determining beam weights and wedge filters.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2002 Summer;3(3):190-9. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v3i3.2562.
2
Selecting beam weight and wedge filter on the basis of dose gradient analysis.
Med Phys. 2000 Aug;27(8):1746-52. doi: 10.1118/1.1286591.
3
Clinical implementation of wedge filter optimization in three-dimensional radiotherapy treatment planning.
Radiother Oncol. 1999 Dec;53(3):257-64. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(99)00142-5.
4
A three-dimensional algorithm for optimizing beam weights and wedge filters.
Med Phys. 1998 Oct;25(10):1858-65. doi: 10.1118/1.598375.
5
Genetic and geometric optimization of three-dimensional radiation therapy treatment planning.
Med Phys. 1996 Mar;23(3):293-305. doi: 10.1118/1.597660.
6
The optimisation of wedge filters in radiotherapy of the prostate.
Radiother Oncol. 1995 Dec;37(3):209-20. doi: 10.1016/0167-8140(95)01650-3.
7
A mathematical basis for selection of wedge angle and orientation.
Med Phys. 1993 Jul-Aug;20(4):1211-8. doi: 10.1118/1.596972.
8
A constrained least-squares optimization method for external beam radiation therapy treatment planning.
Med Phys. 1984 Sep-Oct;11(5):659-65. doi: 10.1118/1.595548.
9
Dosimetric precision requirements in radiation therapy.
Acta Radiol Oncol. 1984;23(5):379-91. doi: 10.3109/02841868409136037.
10
Semi-automated radiotherapy treatment planning with a mathematical model to satisfy treatment goals.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1989 Jan;16(1):271-6. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(89)90042-4.