Gast Richard K, Guraya Rupa, Jones Deana R, Anderson Kenneth E, Karcher Darrin M
USDA Agricultural Research Service, U. S. National Poultry Research Center, Athens, GA, USA.
Department of Poultry Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Front Vet Sci. 2017 Apr 10;4:47. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00047. eCollection 2017.
Human infections with Enteritidis are often attributed to the consumption of contaminated eggs, so the prevalence of this pathogen in egg-laying poultry is an important public health risk factor. Numerous and complex environmental influences on persistence and transmission are exerted by management practices and housing facilities used in commercial egg production. In recent years, the animal welfare implications of poultry housing systems have guided the development of alternatives to traditional cage-based housing, but their food safety consequences are not yet fully understood. The present study assessed the effects of different bird stocking densities on the frequency and duration of fecal shedding of . Enteritidis in groups of experimentally infected laying hens housed in colony cages enriched with perching and nesting areas. In two trials, groups of laying hens were distributed at two stocking densities (648 and 973 cm/bird) into enriched colony cages and (along with a group housed in conventional cages at 648 cm/bird) orally inoculated with doses of 1.0 × 10 cfu of . Enteritidis. At 10 weekly postinoculation intervals, samples of voided feces were collected from beneath each cage and cultured to detect . Enteritidis. Fecal shedding of . Enteritidis was detected for up to 10 weeks postinoculation by hens in all three housing treatment groups. The overall frequency of positive fecal cultures was significantly ( < 0.05) greater from conventional cages than from enriched colony cages (at the lower stocking density) for the total of all sampling dates (45.0 vs. 33.3%) and also for samples collected at 4-9 weeks postinfection. Likewise, the frequency of . Enteritidis isolation from feces from conventional cages was significantly greater than from enriched colony cages (at the higher hen stocking density) for the sum of all samples (45.0 vs. 36.7%) and at 6 weeks postinoculation. Moreover, the frequency of . Enteritidis fecal recovery from enriched colony cages at the higher hen stocking was significantly greater than from similar cages at the lower stocking density for all 10 sampling dates combined (39.4 vs. 33.3%). These results suggest that stocking density can affect . Enteritidis intestinal colonization and fecal shedding in laying hens, but some other difference between conventional and enriched colony cage systems appears to exert an additional influence.
人类感染肠炎沙门氏菌通常归因于食用受污染的鸡蛋,因此这种病原体在产蛋家禽中的流行是一个重要的公共卫生风险因素。商业蛋鸡生产中使用的管理措施和饲养设施对该病原体的持久性和传播产生了众多复杂的环境影响。近年来,家禽饲养系统对动物福利的影响推动了传统笼养方式替代方案的发展,但其对食品安全的影响尚未完全明确。本研究评估了不同饲养密度对实验感染的蛋鸡群粪便中肠炎沙门氏菌排泄频率和持续时间的影响,这些蛋鸡饲养在配有栖木和产蛋窝的群体笼舍中。在两项试验中,将蛋鸡群以两种饲养密度(每只鸡648平方厘米和973平方厘米)分配到配有栖木和产蛋窝的群体笼舍中,并(与一组以每只鸡648平方厘米饲养在传统笼舍中的蛋鸡一起)口服接种1.0×10 cfu的肠炎沙门氏菌。在接种后的10个每周间隔期,从每个笼舍下方收集排出的粪便样本并进行培养,以检测肠炎沙门氏菌。在所有三种饲养处理组中,母鸡在接种后长达10周都检测到肠炎沙门氏菌的粪便排泄。对于所有采样日期的总和(45.0%对33.3%)以及感染后4至9周收集的样本,传统笼舍中粪便培养阳性的总体频率显著高于(P<0.05)配有栖木和产蛋窝的群体笼舍(较低饲养密度)。同样,对于所有样本的总和(45.0%对36.7%)以及接种后6周,从传统笼舍粪便中分离出肠炎沙门氏菌的频率显著高于配有栖木和产蛋窝的群体笼舍(较高饲养密度)。此外,在所有10个采样日期的总和中,较高饲养密度下配有栖木和产蛋窝的群体笼舍中肠炎沙门氏菌粪便回收率显著高于类似的较低饲养密度笼舍(39.4%对33.3%)。这些结果表明,饲养密度会影响蛋鸡中肠炎沙门氏菌的肠道定植和粪便排泄,但传统笼舍系统和配有栖木和产蛋窝的群体笼舍系统之间的其他一些差异似乎也会产生额外影响。