• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[研究中的性别平等:SAGER 指南的基本原理及推荐用法]

[Sex and Gender Equity in Research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use].

作者信息

Heidari Shirin, Babor Thomas F, Castro Paola De, Tort Sera, Curno Mirjam

机构信息

Reproductive Health Matters, EASE Gender Policy Committee, Londres, Reino Unido.

University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Department of Community Medicine and Health Care, Mainsfield, CT, Estados Unidos.

出版信息

Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2017 Jul-Sep;26(3):665-675. doi: 10.5123/S1679-49742017000300025.

DOI:10.5123/S1679-49742017000300025
PMID:28443945
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sex and gender differences are often overlooked in research design, study implementation and scientific reporting, as well as in general science communication. This oversight limits the generalizability of research findings and their applicability to clinical practice, in particular for women but also for men. This article describes the rationale for an international set of guidelines to encourage a more systematic approach to the reporting of sex and gender in research across disciplines.

METHODS

A panel of 13 experts representing nine countries developed the guidelines through a series of teleconferences, conference presentations and a 2-day workshop. An internet survey of 716 journal editors, scientists and other members of the international publishing community was conducted as well as a literature search on sex and gender policies in scientific publishing.

RESULTS

The Sex and Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) guidelines are a comprehensive procedure for reporting of sex and gender information in study design, data analyses, results and interpretation of findings.

CONCLUSIONS

The SAGER guidelines are designed primarily to guide authors in preparing their manuscripts, but they are also useful for editors, as gatekeepers of science, to integrate assessment of sex and gender into all manuscripts as an integral part of the editorial process.

摘要

背景

在研究设计、研究实施、科学报告以及一般科学传播中,性别差异常常被忽视。这种忽视限制了研究结果的普遍性及其在临床实践中的适用性,尤其是对女性而言,对男性也是如此。本文阐述了制定一套国际准则的基本原理,以鼓励采用更系统的方法在跨学科研究中报告性别信息。

方法

一个由来自九个国家的13名专家组成的小组通过一系列电话会议、会议发言和为期两天的研讨会制定了这些准则。对716名期刊编辑、科学家和国际出版界的其他成员进行了一项网络调查,并对科学出版中的性别政策进行了文献检索。

结果

《研究中的性别平等(SAGER)准则》是一套在研究设计、数据分析、结果及研究结果解读中报告性别信息的综合程序。

结论

SAGER准则主要旨在指导作者撰写稿件,但对于作为科学把关人的编辑而言也很有用,可将性别评估作为编辑过程的一个组成部分纳入所有稿件中。

相似文献

1
[Sex and Gender Equity in Research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use].[研究中的性别平等:SAGER 指南的基本原理及推荐用法]
Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2017 Jul-Sep;26(3):665-675. doi: 10.5123/S1679-49742017000300025.
2
[Sex and gender equity in research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use].[研究中的性别平等:SAGER 指南的基本原理及推荐用法]
Gac Sanit. 2019 Mar-Apr;33(2):203-210. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.04.003. Epub 2018 May 3.
3
Sex and Gender Equity in Research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use.研究中的性别平等:SAGER 指南的基本原理及推荐用法。
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2016 May 3;1:2. doi: 10.1186/s41073-016-0007-6. eCollection 2016.
4
Sex And Gender Equity in Research (SAGER): reporting guidelines as a framework of innovation for an equitable approach to gender medicine. Commentary.研究中的性别平等(SAGER):作为性别医学公平方法创新框架的报告指南。评论
Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2016 Apr-Jun;52(2):154-7. doi: 10.4415/ANN_16_02_05.
5
Sex and gender equity in research and scientific publication.研究与科学出版中的性别平等
Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2017 Jul-Sep;26(3):431-432. doi: 10.5123/S1679-49742017000300001.
6
Leading the way: guidance to quality scientific reporting.引领方向:高质量科学报告指南
J Sex Med. 2010 Jun;7(6):1983-1984. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01861.x.
7
Assessing sex and gender equity in submission guidelines of radiology journals: A cross-sectional study.评估放射学期刊投稿指南中的性别公平性:一项横断面研究。
Eur J Radiol. 2024 Sep;178:111628. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111628. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
8
The Role of Journals in Reporting Sex and Gender-Based Outcomes: Should We Adopt Guidelines, and What Else Can We Do to Improve Reporting?期刊在报告性别相关结局中的作用:我们是否应该采用指南,以及还有什么其他方法可以改善报告?
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2024 Sep 4;106(17):1610-1614. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.24.00035. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
9
The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 Statement.《行为干预单病例报告指南(SCRIBE)2016声明》
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 May;73:142-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.04.006. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
10
The implementation of sex-and gender-based considerations in exercise-based randomized controlled trials in individuals with stroke: A cross-sectional study.将性别考虑因素纳入基于运动的随机对照试验中对脑卒中患者的影响:一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 9;19(10):e0308519. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308519. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Spatial analysis of granting of social welfare benefits to people with gastrointestinal Chagas disease in Brazil, 2004-2016: a time series study.2004 - 2016年巴西向胃肠道型恰加斯病患者发放社会福利的空间分析:一项时间序列研究
Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2025 Jun 13;34:e20240622. doi: 10.1590/S2237-96222025v34e20240622.en. eCollection 2025.
2
Determinants of surgical approach to pediatric appendicitis in Brazil.巴西小儿阑尾炎手术方式的决定因素。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2025 May 20;41(1):141. doi: 10.1007/s00383-025-06030-w.
3
Suicidal incidence and gender-based discrepancies in prolonged grief disorder: insights from a meta-analysis and systematic review.
自杀发生率与持续性悲伤障碍中的性别差异:一项荟萃分析与系统评价的见解
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Aug 15;15:1427486. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1427486. eCollection 2024.
4
Survival analysis of Chagas disease patients, beneficiaries of social security and social assistance in Brazil, 1942-2016.巴西 1942-2016 年社会保障和社会救助的恰加斯病患者生存分析。
Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2024 May 17;27:e240020. doi: 10.1590/1980-549720240020. eCollection 2024.
5
Exploring sex differences: insights into gene expression, neuroanatomy, neurochemistry, cognition, and pathology.探索性别差异:对基因表达、神经解剖学、神经化学、认知和病理学的见解。
Front Neurosci. 2024 Feb 21;18:1340108. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1340108. eCollection 2024.
6
Menstrual hygiene access and practices in Latin America: scoping review.月经卫生用品的获取和使用在拉丁美洲:范围综述。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2023 Oct 23;31:e4028. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.6736.4028. eCollection 2023.
7
Clinical Integration of Digital Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Primary Health Care for Chronic Disease Management: Protocol for a Systematic Review.用于慢性病管理的初级卫生保健中数字患者报告结局测量的临床整合:系统评价方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Aug 18;12:e48155. doi: 10.2196/48155.
8
Statistical analysis plans for two randomised controlled trials of the Narrative Experiences Online (NEON) Intervention: impact of receiving recorded mental health recovery narratives on quality of life in people experiencing psychosis (NEON) and people experiencing non-psychosis mental health problems (NEON-O).两项叙事体验在线(NEON)干预随机对照试验的统计分析计划:接受心理健康康复叙事记录对经历精神病和非精神病心理健康问题者生活质量的影响(NEON)和经历非精神病心理健康问题者(NEON-O)。
Trials. 2023 May 20;24(1):343. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07246-8.
9
Quality control and analytic best practices for testing genetic models of sex differences in large populations.大规模人群中性别差异遗传模型检测的质量控制和分析最佳实践。
Cell. 2023 May 11;186(10):2044-2061. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.04.014.
10
Chagas disease and social welfare: characterization of the disease in the Brazilian social security and social assistance, 2004-2016.恰加斯病与社会福利:2004-2016 年巴西社会保障和社会援助中的疾病特征。
Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2022;31(2):e2021777. doi: 10.1590/S2237-96222022000200006.