Utility of a repeat renal biopsy in lupus nephritis: a single centre experience.

BACKGROUND

The role of repeat renal biopsy in lupus nephritis (LN) to guide treatment or predict prognosis has been controversial. We assessed glomerular and tubulointerstitial histological characteristics of serial renal biopsies, correlations with clinical variables and the impact on subsequent management.

METHODS

Out of a large single-centre cohort of 270 biopsy-proven LN patients, 66 (24%) had serial biopsies. LN classes based on glomerular pathology were defined according to the International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society 2003 classification, while tubulointerstitial pathologies were evaluated using the revised Austin's semi-quantitative scoring system.

RESULTS

LN class transitions from proliferative (III and IV) to non-proliferative classes (II and V) were uncommon (n = 4, 7.7%), while non-proliferatives frequently switched to proliferative classes (n = 12, 63.2%) and were more likely to receive increased immunosuppression (P = 0.040). Biochemical or serological variables could not predict these histopathological transitions. Tubulointerstitial score (mean ± standard deviation) progressed from 2.69 ± 2.03 on reference to 3.78 ± 2.03 on repeat biopsy (P = 0.001). Serum creatinine levels correlated with the degree of tubular atrophy on both reference (r = 0.33, P = 0.048) and repeat biopsy (r = 0.56, P < 0.001), and with interstitial scarring (r = 0.60, P < 0.001) on repeat biopsy. Greater interstitial inflammation on reference biopsy was associated with advanced interstitial scarring on repeat biopsies (r = 0.385, P = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Repeat renal biopsy is an important tool to guide management, in particular in those with initial class II or V who flare. Although class transitions cannot be predicted by clinical parameters, serum creatinine level correlates with the degree of tubulointerstitial damage.