Kang Ji-Hyoun, Park Dong-Jin, Lee Kyung-Eun, Lee Ji Shin, Choi Yoo-Duk, Lee Shin-Seok
Department of Rheumatology, Chonnam National University Hospital & Medical School, 42 Jebong-ro, Dong-gu, Gwangju, 61469, Republic of Korea.
Department of Pathology, Chonnam National University Medical School & Hospital, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
Clin Rheumatol. 2017 Jun;36(6):1289-1295. doi: 10.1007/s10067-017-3641-6. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
We investigated whether lupus nephritis (LN) patients could be distinguished based on the time of disease onset and, if so, whether the groups differed in their clinical and laboratory features and long-term prognosis in ethnically homogeneous Korean patients. We enrolled 117 systemic lupus erythematosus patients with available clinical data at the time of renal biopsy of LN. Sociodemographic, clinical, and laboratory data and concomitant diseases were evaluated at the time of renal biopsy. We divided LN patients, according to age at LN diagnosis, into three groups: juvenile-onset LN (JLN, diagnosed at ≤18 years), adult-onset LN (ALN, diagnosed at 18-50 years), and late-onset LN (LLN, diagnosed at >50 years) and compared demographic, clinical, histological, and laboratory findings. We also compared treatment and long-term prognosis of LN. Of the 117 LN patients, 20 (17.8%), 84 (71.3%), and 13 (10.9%) were JLN, ALN, and LLN patients, respectively. LLN patients showed higher white blood cell counts and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate than ALN or LLN patients. LLN patients had higher chronicity indices and scores. Anti-Ro antibodies were found more frequently in ALN patients, and lower complement levels were more common in JLN patients. During a mean follow-up of 76.5 months, development of chronic kidney disease and death were higher in LLN patients than in JLN and ALN patients. LLN patients showed higher chronicity indices and deterioration of kidney function and death in long-term follow-up compared with JLN and ALN patients. Therefore, LLN patients should be carefully monitored to avoid poor outcomes.
我们研究了狼疮性肾炎(LN)患者是否可以根据疾病发病时间进行区分,如果可以,在种族同质的韩国患者中,这些分组在临床和实验室特征以及长期预后方面是否存在差异。我们纳入了117例在LN肾活检时具有可用临床数据的系统性红斑狼疮患者。在肾活检时评估社会人口统计学、临床和实验室数据以及伴随疾病。我们根据LN诊断时的年龄将LN患者分为三组:青少年期发病的LN(JLN,诊断年龄≤18岁)、成年期发病的LN(ALN,诊断年龄18 - 50岁)和晚期发病的LN(LLN,诊断年龄>50岁),并比较人口统计学、临床、组织学和实验室检查结果。我们还比较了LN的治疗和长期预后。在117例LN患者中,JLN、ALN和LLN患者分别有20例(17.8%)、84例(71.3%)和13例(10.9%)。与ALN或LLN患者相比,LLN患者的白细胞计数更高,估计肾小球滤过率更低。LLN患者的慢性指数和评分更高。抗Ro抗体在ALN患者中更常见,补体水平较低在JLN患者中更常见。在平均76.5个月的随访期间,LLN患者慢性肾脏病的发生和死亡率高于JLN和ALN患者。与JLN和ALN患者相比,LLN患者在长期随访中显示出更高的慢性指数、肾功能恶化和死亡率。因此,应密切监测LLN患者以避免不良结局。