Favaloro Emmanuel J, McCaughan Georgia, Pasalic Leonardo
Department of Laboratory Haematology, Institute of Clinical Pathology and Medical Research and Westmead Hospital, NSW Health Pathology, Westmead, Australia; Sydney Centres for Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Australia.
Department of Laboratory Haematology, Institute of Clinical Pathology and Medical Research and Westmead Hospital, NSW Health Pathology, Westmead, Australia; Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Pathology. 2017 Jun;49(4):346-355. doi: 10.1016/j.pathol.2017.02.005. Epub 2017 Apr 23.
Heparin remains a commonly used anticoagulant in prophylaxis and treatment of venous and arterial thrombosis, in addition to ensuring patency of artificial blood circuits such as cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a rare but potentially fatal complication of heparin therapy that results from production of polyclonal antibodies to heparin in complex, usually with platelet factor 4 (PF4). In a proportion of patients, this causes platelet activation and thrombin generation, which may result in thrombosis. However, identification of patients with HIT can be complicated as thrombocytopenia is common in hospitalised patients receiving heparin, and is usually due to other causes. Clinical assessment of the likelihood of HIT is paramount in order to make appropriate decisions regarding laboratory investigations and ongoing anticoagulation, especially given clinically expressed pro-thrombotic states. However, clinical assessment, on its own, cannot guarantee diagnosis or exclusion of HIT, and therefore is facilitated by laboratory testing, although unfortunately, this is frequently limited by local availability of assays and delay in availability of results. Nevertheless, there are an increasing number of available laboratory tests that can be used to identify antibodies causing HIT, including both immunological and functional assays. This narrative review will discuss the existing tools for clinical assessment in addition to evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of the available laboratory assays for HIT.
肝素仍然是预防和治疗静脉和动脉血栓形成常用的抗凝剂,此外还用于确保诸如体外循环(CPB)等人工血液回路的通畅。肝素诱导的血小板减少症(HIT)是肝素治疗一种罕见但可能致命的并发症,它是由针对肝素与通常为血小板因子4(PF4)形成的复合物产生多克隆抗体所致。在部分患者中,这会导致血小板活化和凝血酶生成,进而可能导致血栓形成。然而,HIT患者的识别可能较为复杂,因为接受肝素治疗的住院患者中血小板减少很常见,且通常由其他原因引起。对于是否为HIT进行临床评估至关重要,以便就实验室检查和持续抗凝做出恰当决策,尤其是考虑到临床已表现出的血栓前状态时。然而,仅靠临床评估无法保证诊断或排除HIT,因此需要实验室检测辅助,不过遗憾的是,这常常受到当地检测方法可用性以及结果获取延迟的限制。尽管如此,越来越多可用于识别导致HIT的抗体的实验室检测方法出现了,包括免疫测定和功能测定。这篇叙述性综述将讨论现有的临床评估工具,并评估用于HIT的现有实验室检测方法的优缺点。