Suppr超能文献

在产前筛查中,将链球菌B显色培养基和快速诊断集团B型链球菌(GBS)实时荧光定量PCR检测法与常规培养法进行比较,以评估其对GBS的检测效果。

Evaluation of StrepB Chromogenic Medium and the Fast-Track Diagnostics Group B Streptococcus (GBS) Real-Time PCR Assay Compared to Routine Culture for Detection of GBS during Antepartum Screening.

作者信息

Church Deirdre L, Baxter Heather, Lloyd Tracie, Larios Oscar, Gregson Daniel B

机构信息

Division of Microbiology, Calgary Laboratory Services, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Departments of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Jul;55(7):2137-2142. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00043-17. Epub 2017 Apr 26.

Abstract

Life-threatening infection in neonates due to group B (GBS) is preventable by screening of near-term pregnant women and treatment at delivery. A total of 295 vaginal-rectal swabs were collected from women attending antepartum clinics in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. GBS colonization was detected by the standard culture method (Strep B Carrot Broth subcultured to blood agar with a neomycin disk) and compared to recovery with Strep Group B Broth (Dalynn Biologicals) subcultured to StrepB chromogenic medium (CM; Bio-Rad Laboratories) and the Fast-Track Diagnostics GBS real-time PCR (quantitative PCR [qPCR]) assay (Phoenix Airmid Biomedical Corp.) performed with broth-enriched samples and the Abbott sp/rt system. A total of 62/295 (21%) women were colonized with GBS; 58 (19.7%) cases were detected by standard culture, while CM and qPCR each found 61 (20.7%) cases. The qPCR and CM were similar in performance, with sensitivities, specificities, and positive and negative predictive values of 98.4 and 98.4%, 99.6 and 99.6%, 98.4 and 98.4%, and 99.6 and 99.6%, respectively, compared to routine culture. Both qPCR and CM would allow more rapid reporting of routine GBS screening results than standard culture. Although the cost per test was similar for standard culture and CM, the routine use of qPCR would cost approximately four times as much as culture-based detection. Laboratories worldwide should consider implementing one of the newer methods for primary GBS testing, depending on the cost limitations of different health care jurisdictions.

摘要

通过对近期孕妇进行筛查并在分娩时进行治疗,可预防新生儿因B族链球菌(GBS)感染而危及生命。从加拿大艾伯塔省卡尔加里产前诊所就诊的女性中总共采集了295份阴道直肠拭子。采用标准培养方法(将B族链球菌胡萝卜肉汤接种到含新霉素纸片的血琼脂上进行传代培养)检测GBS定植情况,并与将B族链球菌肉汤(Dalynn Biologicals公司)接种到B族链球菌显色培养基(CM;伯乐公司)上进行传代培养以及对肉汤增菌样本进行快速诊断GBS实时荧光定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)检测(凤凰航空医学公司)和雅培sp/rt系统的检测结果进行比较。共有62/295(21%)名女性定植有GBS;标准培养法检测出58例(19.7%),而CM和qPCR分别检测出61例(20.7%)。qPCR和CM的性能相似,与常规培养相比,其灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为98.4%和98.4%、99.6%和99.6%、98.4%和98.4%、99.6%和99.6%。与标准培养相比,qPCR和CM都能更快地报告常规GBS筛查结果。虽然标准培养和CM的每次检测成本相似,但qPCR的常规使用成本约为基于培养检测的四倍。世界各地的实验室应根据不同医疗保健辖区的成本限制,考虑采用一种较新的主要GBS检测方法。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验