Turco Claudia V, El-Sayes Jenin, Fassett Hunter J, Chen Robert, Nelson Aimee J
Department of Kinesiology, McMaster University, Canada; and.
Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada.
J Neurophysiol. 2017 Jul 1;118(1):610-618. doi: 10.1152/jn.00118.2017. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
Long-latency afferent inhibition (LAI) is the inhibition of the transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) motor-evoked potentials (MEP) by the sensory afferent volley following electrical stimulation of a peripheral nerve. It is unknown how the activation of sensory afferent fibers relates to the magnitude of LAI. This study investigated the relationship between LAI and the sensory nerve action potentials (SNAP) from the median nerve (MN) and the digital nerves (DN) of the second digit. LAI was obtained by delivering nerve stimulation 200 ms before a TMS pulse delivered over the motor cortex. assessed the magnitude of LAI following stimulation of the contralateral MN or DN using nerve stimulus intensities relative to the maximum SNAP (SNAP) of that nerve and two TMS intensities (0.5- and 1-mV MEP). Results indicate that MN LAI is maximal at 50% SNAP, when presumably all sensory afferents are recruited for TMS of 0.5-mV MEP. For DN, LAI appears at ~50% SNAP and does not increase with further recruitment of sensory afferents. investigated the magnitude of LAI following ipsilateral nerve stimulation at intensities relative to SNAP Results show minimal LAI evoked by ipsilateral MN and no LAI following ipsilateral DN stimulation. Implications for future studies investigating LAI include adjusting nerve stimulation to 50% SNAP to obtain maximal LAI. Additionally, MN LAI can be used as a marker for neurological disease or injury by using a nerve stimulation intensity that can evoke a depth of LAI capable of increasing or decreasing. This is the first investigation of the relationship between long-latency afferent inhibition (LAI) and the sensory afferent volley. Differences exist between median and digital nerve LAI. For the median nerve, LAI increases until all sensory fibers are presumably recruited. In contrast, digital nerve LAI does not increase with the recruitment of additional sensory fibers but rather is present when a given volume of sensory afferent fibers is recruited (50% of maximum sensory nerve action potential). This novel data provide practical guidelines and contribute to our understanding of the mechanisms underlying LAI.
长潜伏期传入抑制(LAI)是指在对周围神经进行电刺激后,感觉传入冲动对经颅磁刺激(TMS)运动诱发电位(MEP)的抑制作用。目前尚不清楚感觉传入纤维的激活与LAI的大小之间有何关系。本研究调查了LAI与来自正中神经(MN)和第二指的指神经(DN)的感觉神经动作电位(SNAP)之间的关系。通过在运动皮层施加TMS脉冲前200毫秒给予神经刺激来获得LAI。使用相对于该神经最大SNAP(SNAP)的神经刺激强度和两种TMS强度(0.5和1 mV MEP)评估对侧MN或DN刺激后的LAI大小。结果表明,当可能所有感觉传入纤维都被募集用于0.5 mV MEP的TMS时,MN LAI在约50% SNAP时最大。对于DN,LAI在约50% SNAP时出现,并且随着感觉传入纤维的进一步募集而不增加。研究了相对于SNAP强度的同侧神经刺激后的LAI大小。结果显示同侧MN诱发的LAI最小,同侧DN刺激后无LAI。对未来研究LAI的启示包括将神经刺激调整至50% SNAP以获得最大LAI。此外,通过使用能够诱发可增加或减少的LAI深度的神经刺激强度,MN LAI可作为神经疾病或损伤的标志物。这是首次对长潜伏期传入抑制(LAI)与感觉传入冲动之间的关系进行研究。正中神经和指神经的LAI存在差异。对于正中神经,LAI会增加,直到可能所有感觉纤维都被募集。相比之下,指神经LAI不会随着额外感觉纤维的募集而增加,而是在募集一定数量的感觉传入纤维时出现(约最大感觉神经动作电位的50%)。这些新数据提供了实用指南,并有助于我们理解LAI背后的机制。