• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

磨蚀作用限制了喜马拉雅山砾石的通量。

Abrasion-set limits on Himalayan gravel flux.

机构信息

School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Drummond Street, Edinburgh EH8 9XP, UK.

出版信息

Nature. 2017 Apr 26;544(7651):471-474. doi: 10.1038/nature22039.

DOI:10.1038/nature22039
PMID:28447640
Abstract

Rivers sourced in the Himalayan mountain range carry some of the largest sediment loads on the planet, yet coarse gravel in these rivers vanishes within approximately 10-40 kilometres on entering the Ganga Plain (the part of the North Indian River Plain containing the Ganges River). Understanding the fate of gravel is important for forecasting the response of rivers to large influxes of sediment triggered by earthquakes or storms. Rapid increase in gravel flux and subsequent channel bed aggradation (that is, sediment deposition by a river) following the 1999 Chi-Chi and 2008 Wenchuan earthquakes reduced channel capacity and increased flood inundation. Here we present an analysis of fan geometry, sediment grain size and lithology in the Ganga Basin. We find that the gravel fluxes from rivers draining the central Himalayan mountains, with upstream catchment areas ranging from about 350 to 50,000 square kilometres, are comparable. Our results show that abrasion of gravel during fluvial transport can explain this observation; most of the gravel sourced more than 100 kilometres upstream is converted into sand by the time it reaches the Ganga Plain. These findings indicate that earthquake-induced sediment pulses sourced from the Greater Himalayas, such as that following the 2015 Gorkha earthquake, are unlikely to drive increased gravel aggradation at the mountain front. Instead, we suggest that the sediment influx should result in an elevated sand flux, leading to distinct patterns of aggradation and flood risk in the densely populated, low-relief Ganga Plain.

摘要

发源于喜马拉雅山脉的河流携带着地球上最大的泥沙负荷之一,但这些河流中的粗砾石在进入恒河平原(北印度河平原的一部分,包含恒河)的大约 10-40 公里范围内就消失了。了解砾石的命运对于预测河流对地震或风暴引发的大量泥沙涌入的反应非常重要。1999 年的集集地震和 2008 年的汶川地震后,砾石通量的迅速增加以及随后的河道床淤积(即河流的泥沙沉积),减少了河道的容量,并增加了洪水泛滥的风险。在这里,我们对恒河流域扇体几何形状、沉积物粒度和岩性进行了分析。我们发现,从中喜马拉雅山脉排水的河流的砾石通量相当,其上游流域面积约为 350 至 50,000 平方公里。我们的结果表明,河流运输过程中的砾石磨损可以解释这一观察结果;当砾石到达恒河平原时,超过 100 公里上游来源的大部分砾石已被磨成沙子。这些发现表明,源自大喜马拉雅山脉的地震诱发的泥沙脉冲,如 2015 年的戈勒克布尔地震之后的脉冲,不太可能导致山前砾石淤积增加。相反,我们认为,泥沙的涌入应该会导致沙通量的增加,从而在人口密集、地势平缓的恒河平原上形成明显的淤积和洪水风险模式。

相似文献

1
Abrasion-set limits on Himalayan gravel flux.磨蚀作用限制了喜马拉雅山砾石的通量。
Nature. 2017 Apr 26;544(7651):471-474. doi: 10.1038/nature22039.
2
Dramatic undercutting of piedmont rivers after the 2008 Wenchuan Ms 8.0 Earthquake.2008年汶川8.0级地震后山前河流的剧烈下切。
Sci Rep. 2016 Nov 18;6:37108. doi: 10.1038/srep37108.
3
Sediment supply controls equilibrium channel geometry in gravel rivers.沉积物供应控制着砾石河中的平衡河道形态。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Mar 28;114(13):3346-3351. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1612907114. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
4
Variations in bar material grain-size and hydraulic conditions of managed and re-naturalized reaches of the gravel-bed Bečva River (Czech Republic).贝奇瓦河(捷克共和国)砾石床管理和再自然化河段的栏材料粒度和水力学条件变化。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 1;649:672-685. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.329. Epub 2018 Aug 26.
5
PROFILE: Hungry Water: Effects of Dams and Gravel Mining on River Channels.简介:饥饿的河流:水坝和砾石开采对河道的影响
Environ Manage. 1997 Jul;21(4):533-51. doi: 10.1007/s002679900048.
6
Two-fraction model of initial sediment motion in gravel-Bed rivers.砾石河床上初始泥沙运动的双分数模型。
Science. 1998 Apr 17;280(5362):410-2. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5362.410.
7
Fluvial fan sedimentary characteristics of distributive fluvial system.分流河流体系的河流冲积扇沉积特征
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 12;14(1):21329. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72102-x.
8
Dam reservoir backwater as a field-scale laboratory of human-induced changes in river biogeomorphology: A review focused on gravel-bed rivers.坝库区回水区作为人类活动影响河流生物地貌学的野外尺度实验室:以砾石床河流为重点的综述。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 15;651(Pt 2):2899-2912. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.138. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
9
Water and soil loss from landslide deposits as a function of gravel content in the Wenchuan earthquake area, China, revealed by artificial rainfall simulations.汶川地震区滑坡堆积物中砾石含量对水土流失的影响——人工模拟降雨试验。
PLoS One. 2018 May 3;13(5):e0196657. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196657. eCollection 2018.
10
Understanding hydrogeomorphic and climatic controls on soil erosion and sediment dynamics in large Himalayan basins.理解大喜马拉雅流域土壤侵蚀和泥沙动态的水文地貌和气候控制因素。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Nov 15;795:148972. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148972. Epub 2021 Jul 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Large riverbed sediment flux sustained for a decade after an earthquake.地震后大河床泥沙通量持续十年。
Nature. 2025 Aug;644(8076):398-403. doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-09354-8. Epub 2025 Aug 13.
2
How canyons evolve by incision into bedrock: Rainbow Canyon, Death Valley National Park, United States.峡谷如何通过切入基岩而演化:美国死亡谷国家公园的彩虹峡谷。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jun 30;117(26):14730-14737. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1911040117. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
3
Long-term dispersion of river gravel in a canyon in the Atacama Desert, Central Andes, deduced from their Be concentrations.

本文引用的文献

1
Geomorphic and geologic controls of geohazards induced by Nepal's 2015 Gorkha earthquake.尼泊尔 2015 年廓尔喀地震引发地质灾害的地貌和地质控制因素。
Science. 2016 Jan 8;351(6269):aac8353. doi: 10.1126/science.aac8353. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
2
Links between erosion, runoff variability and seismicity in the Taiwan orogen.台湾造山带中侵蚀、径流变化与地震活动之间的联系。
Nature. 2003 Dec 11;426(6967):648-51. doi: 10.1038/nature02150.
根据铍含量推断安第斯山脉中部阿塔卡马沙漠峡谷中河砾石的长期扩散情况。
Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 28;9(1):17763. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-53806-x.
4
River self-organisation inhibits discharge control on waterfall migration.河流自组织抑制瀑布迁移的排放控制。
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 5;8(1):2444. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20767-6.