Mehrotra Sonia, Sharma Raj Kumar, Mayya Mahabaleshwar, Gupta Amit, Prasad Narayan, Kaul Anupma, Bhadauria Dharmendra Singh
From the Department of Nephrology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India.
Exp Clin Transplant. 2017 Aug;15(4):394-399. doi: 10.6002/ect.2016.0178. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
There are no reports of de novo donor-specific antibody monitoring by a low-cost solid-phase crossmatch assay using donor lysate after renal transplant.
We prospectively evaluated 121 complement-dependant cytotoxicity crossmatch-negative living-donor kidney transplant recipients for development of de novo donor-specific antibodies (class I and II HLA) by solid-phase crossmatch Luminex assay after transplant.
Of 121 recipients in our study group, 26 (21.5%) developed de novo donor-specific antibody within 3 months after transplant. Fifteen (58%) of these 26 recipients developed class II de novo donor-specific antibody, 8 patients (30%) developed class I, and 3 (12%) developed both class I and class II. Of the remaining 95 patients (79%) who did not develop de novo donor-specific antibody, 6 (33.3%) had antibody-mediated rejection with glomerulitis (2 with C4d-positive disease). Donor-specific antibody was detected by Luminex solid-phase crossmatch in 18 patients (5 with class I, 11 with class II, and 2 with both class I and II), all with no evidence of clinical rejection. Development of de novo donor-specific antibody detected by solid-phase crossmatch was associated with more acute rejection (31% in de novo donor-specific antibody-positive group versus 19% in the negative group). The positive group had more antibody-mediated rejection (75% of acute rejections), whereas only 33.3% of acute rejections in the negative group were antibody-mediated rejection. Of 12 patients with antibody-mediated rejection, 9 were C4d negative (75%) and were diagnosed by donor-specific antibody positivity detected by solid-phase cros?match testing and histologic findings. The use of donor lysate in solid-phase crossmatch assays is more economical than the single-antigen bead Luminex assay (per test cost of US $45.20 vs $403.20).
尚无关于肾移植后使用供体裂解物通过低成本固相交叉配型试验进行新生供体特异性抗体监测的报道。
我们前瞻性评估了121例补体依赖细胞毒性交叉配型阴性的活体供肾移植受者,在移植后通过固相交叉配型Luminex试验检测新生供体特异性抗体(I类和II类 HLA)的发生情况。
在我们的研究组121例受者中,26例(21.5%)在移植后3个月内产生了新生供体特异性抗体。这26例受者中,15例(58%)产生了II类新生供体特异性抗体,8例(30%)产生了I类,3例(12%)同时产生了I类和II类。在其余95例(79%)未产生新生供体特异性抗体的患者中,6例(33.3%)发生了伴有肾小球炎的抗体介导排斥反应(2例为C4d阳性疾病)。通过Luminex固相交叉配型在18例患者中检测到供体特异性抗体(5例为I类,11例为II类,2例同时有I类和II类),所有这些患者均无临床排斥反应的证据。通过固相交叉配型检测到的新生供体特异性抗体的产生与更多的急性排斥反应相关(新生供体特异性抗体阳性组为31%,阴性组为19%)。阳性组有更多的抗体介导排斥反应(急性排斥反应的75%),而阴性组急性排斥反应中只有33.3%是抗体介导排斥反应。在12例抗体介导排斥反应的患者中,9例(75%)C4d阴性,通过固相交叉配型检测的供体特异性抗体阳性和组织学检查结果确诊。在固相交叉配型试验中使用供体裂解物比单抗原微珠Luminex试验更经济(每次检测成本为45.20美元对403.20美元)。