Bye W A, Jairath V, Travis S P L
Translational Gastroenterology Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Departments of Medicine, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Jul;46(1):3-15. doi: 10.1111/apt.14075. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
Vedolizumab specifically recognises the α4β7 integrin and selectively blocks gut lymphocyte trafficking: potentially, it offers gut-specific immunosuppression.
To review the safety of vedolizumab and summarise post-marketing data to assess if any safety concerns that differ from registration trials have emerged.
A systematic bibliographic search identified six registration trials and nine cohort studies.
Integrated data from registration trials included 2830 vedolizumab-exposed patients (4811 person-years exposure [PYs]) and 513 placebo patients. This reported lower exposure-adjusted incidence rates of infection (63.5/100 PYs; 95% CI: 59.6-67.3) and serious adverse events (20.0/100 PYs; 95% CI: 18.5-21.5) compared to placebo (82.9/100 PYs; 95% CI: 68.3-97.5) and (28.3/100 PYs 95% CI: 20.6-35.9) respectively. Higher, but statistically insignificant rates of enteric infections occurred in vedolizumab-exposed patients (7.4/100 PYs; 95% CI: 6.6-8.3) compared to placebo (6.7 PYs; 95% CI: 3.2-10.1). Six post-marketing cohort studies (1049 patients, 403 PYs) demonstrated rates of infection of 8% (82/1049); enteric infection of 2% (21/1049) and adverse events of 16% (166/1049). Multivariate analysis in one cohort study suggested increased risk of surgical site infection with perioperative VDZ. Human experience in pregnancy is limited.
Post-marketing data confirm the excellent safety of vedolizumab observed in registration trials. The signal of post-operative complications should be interpreted with caution, but warrants further study. Although comparative studies are needed, Vedolizumab may be a safe alternative in patients who best avoid systematic immunosuppression, including those pre-disposed to infection, malignancy or the elderly.
维多珠单抗特异性识别α4β7整合素并选择性阻断肠道淋巴细胞运输:它可能提供肠道特异性免疫抑制。
回顾维多珠单抗的安全性并总结上市后数据,以评估是否出现了与注册试验不同的任何安全问题。
系统的文献检索确定了六项注册试验和九项队列研究。
注册试验的综合数据包括2830例接受维多珠单抗治疗的患者(暴露人年数[PYs]为4811)和513例安慰剂患者。与安慰剂相比,报告的感染暴露调整发病率较低(63.5/100 PYs;95%置信区间:59.6 - 67.3),严重不良事件也较低(20.0/100 PYs;95%置信区间:18.5 - 21.5),安慰剂组的感染暴露调整发病率为(82.9/100 PYs;95%置信区间:68.3 - 97.5),严重不良事件为(28.3/100 PYs;95%置信区间:20.6 - 35.9)。接受维多珠单抗治疗的患者发生肠道感染的比例较高,但无统计学意义(7.4/100 PYs;95%置信区间:6.6 - 8.3),而安慰剂组为(6.7/100 PYs;95%置信区间:3.2 - 10.1)。六项上市后队列研究(1049例患者,403 PYs)显示感染率为8%(82/1049);肠道感染率为2%(21/1049),不良事件发生率为16%(166/1049)。一项队列研究的多变量分析表明围手术期使用维多珠单抗会增加手术部位感染的风险。关于孕期的人体经验有限。
上市后数据证实了注册试验中观察到的维多珠单抗的出色安全性。术后并发症的信号应谨慎解读,但值得进一步研究。尽管需要进行比较研究,但对于最需要避免全身免疫抑制的患者,包括那些易感染、患恶性肿瘤或老年人,维多珠单抗可能是一种安全的选择。