Suppr超能文献

一项关于食管切除术后皮下食管重建的非随机回顾性观察研究:在高危患者中是否可行?

A non-randomized retrospective observational study on the subcutaneous esophageal reconstruction after esophagectomy: is it feasible in high-risk patients?

作者信息

Chung Jae Ho, Lee Sung Ho, Yi Eunjue, Jung Jae Seung, Han Jung Wook, Kim Tae Sik, Son Ho Sung, Kim Kwang Taik

机构信息

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University Medical College, Anam Hospital, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Thorac Dis. 2017 Mar;9(3):675-684. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.03.02.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Esophageal reconstruction after esophagectomy is a complex procedure with high morbidity and mortality. Anastomotic leakage is more severe and frequent in patients with preoperative comorbidities and may present with septic conditions. Considering the possibility of an easier management of such cases, we evaluated the safety and feasibility of subcutaneous esophageal reconstruction in patients with high operative risks.

METHODS

We performed a non-randomized retrospective observational study on the 75 (subcutaneous: 21, intrathoracic: 54) esophageal cancer patients who underwent esophageal reconstruction either through subcutaneous or intrathoracic route between January 2003 and February 2015. Preoperative data including the estimated reasons for the selection of the subcutaneous route were obtained from medical charts. Clinical outcomes were evaluated and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The mean postoperative hospital stay was longer in the subcutaneous group than the overall group. Anastomotic leakage occurred more frequently in the subcutaneous group [10 (47.6%) 7 (13%), P=0.004]. Three major leakages resulted in chronic cutaneous fistula, but were successfully treated by lower neck reconstruction using radial forearm fasciocutaneous free flap (RFFF). There was no in-hospital mortality in the subcutaneous group.

CONCLUSIONS

Subcutaneous esophageal reconstruction in high-risk patients showed a higher rate of anastomotic leakage. However, easier correction without fatal septic conditions could be obtained by primary repair or flap reconstruction resulting in lower perioperative mortality. Therefore, esophageal reconstruction through the subcutaneous route is not recommended as a routine primary option. However, in highly selected patients with unfavorable preoperative comorbidities or intraoperative findings, especially those with poor blood supply to the graft, graft hematoma or edema, or gross tumor invasion to surrounding tissues, esophageal reconstruction through the subcutaneous route may carefully be considered as an alternative to the conventional surgical techniques.

摘要

背景

食管切除术后的食管重建是一个复杂的手术,具有较高的发病率和死亡率。术前合并症患者的吻合口漏更为严重和频繁,可能会出现感染情况。考虑到这类病例可能更容易处理,我们评估了高手术风险患者皮下食管重建的安全性和可行性。

方法

我们对2003年1月至2015年2月期间通过皮下或胸内途径进行食管重建的75例食管癌患者进行了非随机回顾性观察研究。术前数据包括选择皮下途径的估计原因,均从病历中获取。对两组患者的临床结果进行评估和比较。

结果

皮下组的术后平均住院时间长于总体组。皮下组吻合口漏的发生率更高[10例(47.6%)比7例(13%),P = 0.004]。3例严重漏导致慢性皮肤瘘,但通过使用桡侧前臂游离筋膜皮瓣(RFFF)进行下颈部重建成功治愈。皮下组无院内死亡病例。

结论

高危患者的皮下食管重建显示出较高的吻合口漏发生率。然而,通过一期修复或皮瓣重建可更容易地进行纠正,且不会出现致命的感染情况,从而降低围手术期死亡率。因此,不建议将皮下途径食管重建作为常规的首选方案。然而,对于术前合并症不佳或术中发现不利的高度选择患者,尤其是那些移植物血供差、移植物血肿或水肿,或肿瘤明显侵犯周围组织的患者,可谨慎考虑将皮下途径食管重建作为传统手术技术的替代方案。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验