Suppr超能文献

托伐普坦与限液疗法治疗低钠血症住院患者的经济学分析

An economic analysis of tolvaptan compared with fluid restriction among hospitalized patients with hyponatremia.

作者信息

Ramamohan Varun, Mladsi Deirdre, Ronquest Naoko, Kamat Siddhesh, Boklage Susan

机构信息

a Department of Health Economics , RTI Health Solutions , Research Triangle Park , NC 27709-2194 , USA.

b Department of Health Economics and Outcomes Research , Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization , Princeton , NJ , USA.

出版信息

Hosp Pract (1995). 2017 Aug;45(3):111-117. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2017.1324227. Epub 2017 May 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The vasopressin-receptor antagonist tolvaptan is used for the treatment of hyponatremia (HN) in hospitalized patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) or syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH). The objective of this economic modeling study was to assess the potential cost and health outcomes associated with tolvaptan in comparison with fluid restriction (FR).

METHODS

A decision-analytic model was developed to estimate potential cost and health outcomes associated with tolvaptan compared with FR among hospitalized CHF and SIADH patients with severe HN (serum sodium [SS] levels < 125 mEq/L). The model, which was populated with data from the published literature, assumes that response to treatment influences hospital length of stay, probability of an intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and probability of a 30-day all-cause hospital readmission. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSAs) assessed the influence of parameter uncertainty on model results.

RESULTS

Model results suggest that, among hospitalized CHF patients with severe HN, the use of tolvaptan compared with FR may lead to reductions of 7.2% and 4.6% in ICU admissions and 30-day readmissions, respectively. Compared with FR, tolvaptan may result in total cost-savings of $156 per hospitalized CHF patient. Among hospitalized SIADH patients with severe HN, the model suggested reductions of 14.6% and 5.1% in ICU admissions and 30-day readmissions, respectively. Compared with FR, tolvaptan may result in total cost-savings of $135 per hospitalized SIADH patient. PSAs found that the probabilities of net cost-savings from the use of tolvaptan compared with FR were 64% and 59% among patients with severe HN with CHF and SIADH, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Decision-analytic modeling based on published data for hospitalized CHF and SIADH patients with severe HN, indicates that tolvaptan compared with FR has the potential to improve health outcomes and produce cost-savings that more than offset the cost of tolvaptan.

摘要

目的

血管加压素受体拮抗剂托伐普坦用于治疗充血性心力衰竭(CHF)或抗利尿激素分泌异常综合征(SIADH)的住院患者的低钠血症(HN)。本经济模型研究的目的是评估与限液(FR)相比,托伐普坦的潜在成本和健康结局。

方法

建立了一个决策分析模型,以估计在患有严重HN(血清钠[SS]水平<125 mEq/L)的住院CHF和SIADH患者中,与FR相比,托伐普坦的潜在成本和健康结局。该模型采用已发表文献中的数据,假设治疗反应会影响住院时间、入住重症监护病房(ICU)的概率以及30天全因再入院的概率。单向和概率敏感性分析(PSA)评估了参数不确定性对模型结果的影响。

结果

模型结果表明,在患有严重HN的住院CHF患者中,与FR相比,使用托伐普坦可能分别使ICU入院率和30天再入院率降低7.2%和4.6%。与FR相比,托伐普坦可能使每位住院CHF患者节省总成本156美元。在患有严重HN的住院SIADH患者中,模型表明ICU入院率和30天再入院率分别降低14.6%和5.1%。与FR相比,托伐普坦可能使每位住院SIADH患者节省总成本135美元。PSA发现,在患有严重HN的CHF和SIADH患者中,与FR相比,使用托伐普坦实现净成本节约的概率分别为64%和59%。

结论

基于已发表数据对患有严重HN的住院CHF和SIADH患者进行的决策分析模型表明,与FR相比,托伐普坦有可能改善健康结局并产生成本节约,且节约的成本足以抵消托伐普坦的成本。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验